ALLIANCE, INCEST AND DIVORCE ALLIANCE COLLECTED

Transcription

ALLIANCE, INCEST AND DIVORCE
ALLIANCE
COLLECTED ESSAYS
Comaroff, J. L. (ed.)
1980. The Meaning of Marriage Payments. London and New York: Academic Press.
Reviews: Drucker-Brown 1982; Scheffler 1982.
Craik, Elizabeth M. (ed.)
1984. Marriage and Property. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
Dumont, Louis.
1983. Affinity as a Value: Marriage Alliances in South India, with Comparative Essays
on Australia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 230 P.
Reviews: Parkin 1983; Barnett 1984; Kolenda 1984; Kuper 1984; Scheffler 1984; Krause
1985; Pfeffer 1985; Reddy 1985; White, I. 1985; Madan 1986.
Goody, Jack R., and S. J. Tambiah. (eds.)
1973. Bridewealth and Dowry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Review: Specer 1975.
Fortes, Meyer. (ed.)
1962. Marriage in Tribal Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reviews: Murdock 1962; Cohen 1964; Sousberghe 1974.
Heusch, Luc de.
1971. Pourquoi l’Épouser? Et Autres Essais. Paris: Gallimard.
Reviews: Baal 1972; Pouillon 1972.
English translation (with additional articles): Why Marry Her?: Society and Symbolic
Structures, by Luc de Heusch. Translated by Janet Lloyd. Cambridge and New York:
Cambridge University Press, 1981.
Reynolds, Vernon, and John Kellett. (eds.)
1991. Mating and Marriage. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Review: Parkin 1994.
HISTORICAL
Salmon, Thomas.
1724. A Critical Essay Concerning Marriage, to which is added, an historical account of
the marriage rites and ceremonies of the Greeks and Romans, and our Saxon ancestors,
and of most nations of the world at this day. London: Printed for C. Rivington, 10 P.
DISCUSSIONS and DEBATES
Dumont, Louis.
HAVE
1961. Descent, Filiation, Affinity. Man 61: 24-25. [Apropos the debate between Fortes
and Leach.]
Fortes, Meyer.
HAVE
1959. Descent, Filiation and Affinity: A Rejoinder to Leach. Man 59: 193-197, 206-212.
Reprinted in: Time and Social Structure and Other Essays, by Meyer Fortes. Pp. 96-126.
London: University of London, Athlone Press; New York: Humanities Press, 1970.
See also Leach 1957 (SINO-TIBETAN).
Leach, Edmund R.
1960. Descent, Filiation and Affinity. Man 60: 9-10.
HAVE
GENERAL
Abrahams, R. G.
1973. Some Aspects of Levirate. In The Character of Kinship, edited by Jack Goody. Pp.
163-173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aginsky, Bernard W.
1935. Kinship Systems and the Forms of Marriage. Menasha, Wisconsin: American
Anthropological Association. 102 P. (Memoirs of the American Anthropological
Association 45; Supplement to American Anthropologist 37 (4, pt. 2).)
Reviews: Haekel 1936; Anonymous 1937.
Aginsky, Bernard W.
1936. Kinship Systems and the Forms of Marriage. Ph.D. dissertation. Columbia
University.
Allen, Nick J.
2000. Comment: Marriage by Capture. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6
(1): 135.
Atkins, John R., and Woodrow W. Denham.
1981. Comment on Martin. Current Anthropology 22 (4): 407.
HAVE
Ayoub, Millicent R.
1959a. Parallel Cousin Marriage and Endogamy: A Study in Sociometry. Publications of
the Fels Research Institute 2: 266-275. Yellow Springs, OH.
Ayoub, Millicent R.
1959. Parallel Cousin Marriage and Endogamy: A Study in Sociometry. Journal of
Anthropological Research 15: 266-275.
Barnard, Alan.
HAVE
Barnes, J. A.
1960. Marriage and Residential Continuity. American Anthropologist 62 (5): 850-866.
Barnes, Robert H.
1975. Elementary and Complex Structures. Man 10 (3): 472-473.
HAVE
See Heusch 1974; Heusch 1975.
Barnes, Robert H.
HAVE
1999. Marriage by Capture. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5 (1): 57-73.
Barth, Fredrik.
1973. Descent and Marriage Reconsidered. In The Character of Kinship, edited by Jack
Goody. Pp. 3-19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Cross-listed in KIN-BASED
GROUPS.]
Benedict, Ruth.
HAVE
1936. Marital Property Rights in Bilateral Society. American Anthropologist 38 (3, pt. 1):
368-373.
Bernard, Jessie.
1966. Marital Stability and Patterns of Status Variables. Journal of Marriage and the
Family 28: 421-439.
Bernot, Lucien.
1965. Lévirat et Sororat. L’Homme 5 (3-4): 101-112.
Berting, J., and H. Philipsen.
1960. Solidarity, Stratification and Sentiments: The Unilateral Cross-Cousin Marriage
According to the Theories of Lévi-Strauss, Leach, and Homans and Schneider. Bijdragen
tot de Taal-, Land en Volkenkunde 116: 55-80.
Berting, J., and H. Philipsen.
1960. Unilateral Cross-Cousin Marriage: A Reply to Needham. Bijdragen tot de Taal-,
Land en Volkenkunde 118: 155-159.
Bonte, Pierre.
1976. A propos de la circulation des femmes. Cahiers du Centre d’Etudes et de
Recherches Marxistes128: 46-61.
Bonte, Pierre.
1994. Le sein, l’alliance, l’inceste. Autrement 143: 143-156.
Bonte, Pierre.
2000. L’echange est-il un universel? L’Homme 154-155: 39-66.
Bonte, Pierre, and Élizabeth Copet-Rougier.
1990. Groupes de parenté et stratégies matrimoniales. In Parenté et Stratégies Familiales
dans l'Antiquité Romaine, edited by Jean Andreau and Hinnerk Bruhns. Pp. 253-256.
Roma: École Française de Rome.
Bonte, Pierre, and N. Echard.
1978. Anthropologie et sexualité: Les inégales. In La Condition Feminine. Pp. 59-87.
Paris: Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Marxistes, Editions Sociales.
Bourdieu, Pierre.
1972. Les stratégies matrimoniales dans le système de reproduction. Annales: Économies,
Sociétés, Civilisations 27 (4-5): 105-1129.
Translated into English as “Marriage Strategies as Strategies of Social Reproduction” in
Family and Society: Selections from the Annales: Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations,
edited by Robert Forster and Orest Ranum. Pp. 117-144. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University Press, 1976.
Briffault, Robert, and Bronislaw Malinowski.
1956. Marriage, Past and Present. Boston: P. Sargent.
Review: Lévi-Strauss 1957.
Busch, Ruth C.
1972. In-Laws and Out-Laws: A Discussion of Affinal Components of Kinship.
Ethnology 11 (2): 127-131. [Turkish material. Cross-listed in ALTAIC.]
HAVE
Chattopadhyay, K. P.
HAVE
1931. Contact of Peoples as Affecting Marriage Rules (Presidential Address). In
Proceedings of the 18th Indian Science Congress, Nagpur, 1931 (Third Circuit). P. 369409. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal.
Collier, Jane F.
1988. Marriage and Inequality in Classless Societies. Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
Reviews: Gerstel 1989; Friedl E. 1991; Miller D. 1993.
Copet-Rougier, Elisabeth.
1990. Le clan, le lieu, l’alliance. In Complexités de l’Alliance, edited by Françoise
Héritier-Augé and Elisabeth Copet-Rougier. Vol. 1. Les Systèmes Semi-Complexes. Pp.
193-232. Paris: Éditions des Archives Contemporaines. [Cross-listed in KIN-BASED
GROUPS.]
Copet-Rougier, Elisabeth, and Françoise Héritier-Augé.
HAVE
1993. Commentaires sur commentaire: Réponse à E. Viveiros de Castro. L’Homme 33
(1): 139-148.
See Viveiros de Castro 1993.
Coult, Alan D.
1962. An Analysis of Needham’s Critique of the Homans and Schneider Theory.
Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 18: 317-335.
Reply: Needham 1963.
Coult, Allan D.
1962. The Determinants of Differential Cross-Cousin Marriage. Man 62: 34-36.
Coult, Alan D.
HAVE
1965. Terminological Correlates of Cross-Cousin Marriage. Bijdragen tot de Taal-,
Land- und Volkenkunde 121 (1): 120-139.
Coult, Allan D.
1966. The Structuring of Structure. American Anthropologist 68 (2, pt. 1): 438-443.
[Unilateral cross-cousin marriage.]
See also Homans 1967; Coult 1967.
Coult, Allan D.
1967. Reply to Homans. American Anthropologist 69 (2): 230.
Coult, Alan D.
1972. Kinship Terminology and the Fallacy of Prescriptive Marriage. Current
Anthropology 13 (1): 110-112.
Crawley, Ernest.
1902. The Mystic Rose: A Study of Primitive Marriage. London: Macmillan.
Cuisenier, Jean.
HAVE
1963. Formes de la parenté et formes de la pensée. Esprit 11 (322): 547-563. Paris. [A
structuralist analysis of alliance, primarily the Murngin system.]
Datta, Asha.
1988. Marriage: Socio-Psychological Aspects. In Marriage in India: Tribes, Muslims,
and Anglo-Indians, edited by B. B. Goswami, J. Sarkar, and D. Danda. Pp. 290-.
Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India.
Davis, Kingsley.
1941. Intermarriage in Caste Societies. American Anthropologist 43 (3, pt. 1): 376-395.
Dumont, Louis.
The Marriage Alliance.
Reprinted in: Marriage, Family and Residence, edited by Paul J. Bohannan. Pp. 203-211.
Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press, 1968; Readings in Kinship and Social
Structure, edited by Nelson Graburn. Pp. 232-237. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
Dumont, Louis.
1975. Dravidien et Kariera: L’Alliance de Mariage dans l’Inde du Sud et en Australie.
Paris and The Hague: EHESS. (Textes de Sciences Sociales 14.)
Review: Allen 1976; Ruiter 1977.
Dumont, Louis.
1983. Stocktaking 1981: Affinity as a Value. In Affinity as Value: Marriage Alliance in
South India, with Comparative Essays on Australia, by Louis Dumont. Pp. 207-236.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dupré, Marie-Claude.
1981. Sous l’échange, l’inceste (Brève relecture des Structures élémentaires de la
parenté). L’Homme 21 (3): 27-37.
Durkheim, Émile.
1897. ‘La famille’ et ‘le mariage’. Année Sociologique 1: 306-340. [Cross-listed in KINBASED GROUPS.]
Erickson, M. T.
2000. The Evolution of Incest Avoidance: Oedipus and the Psychopathologies of
Kinship. In Genes on the Couch: Explorations in Evolutionary Psychotherapy, edited by
Paul Gilbert and Kent G. Bailey. Pp. 211-231. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
Festinger, Georges.
1970. Conditions de symétrie des prohibitions lignagères de mariage: application au cas
omaha. L’Homme 10 (2): 109-115.
Fischer, Th. H.
1949. Monogamie en polygamie. In Wegens zijn Bijzondere verdienste opgedragen aan
Prof. Mr. J. P. Suyling door de Indologische Faculteit te Utrecht. Pp. 105-119.
Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fischer, Th. H.
1954. Monogamy. Netherlands-America University League Bulletin 5 (2).
Fischer, Th. H.
1956. For a New Definition of Marriage. Man 56 (92): 87.
Firth, Raymond.
HAVE
1930. Marriage and the Classificatory System of Relationship. Journal of the Royal
Anthropological Institute 60: 235-268.
Reprinted in: Essays on Social Organization and Values, by Raymond Firth. Pp. 88-122.
London: University of London/Athlone Press, 1964.
Excerpted under title “General Observations Upon the Classificatory System” in:
Readings in Kinship and Social Structure, edited by Nelson Graburn. Pp. 134-135. New
York: Harper & Row, 1971.
Fison, Lorimer.
1893. Group Marriage and Relationship. Report of the Australasian Association for the
Advancement of Science 4: 688-697. Sydney.
Fortune, Reo F.
1933. A Note on Some Forms of Kinship Structures. Oceania 4 (1): 1-9.
HAVE
Fox, Robin.
1972. Alliance and Constraint: Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Human Kinship
Systems. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871-1971, edited by Bernard
Campbell. Pp. 282-331. Chicago: Aldine.
Ganzer, Burkhard.
1979. Kategorie und Verwandtschaftsterminologie in der Theorie der Präskriptiven
Allianz. Frankfurt am Main, Bern and Las Vegas: Lang. 275 P.
Gluckman, Max.
HAVE
1953. Bridewealth and the Stability of Marriage. Man 53 (223): 141-143. [Response to
Schneider 1953.]
See also Leach 1953; Gluckman 1954; Watson 1954.
Gluckman, Max.
1954. Bridewealth and the Stability of Marriage. Man 54 (96): 67.
HAVE
Goody, Jack.
1970. Marriage, Prestations, Inheritance and Descent in Pre-Industrial Societies. Journal
of Comparative Family Studies 1: 37-54.
Haeckel, Josef.
1937. Das Dreiclansystem. Sitzungsberichte der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien
38: 11-13.
Hage, Per, and Frank Harary.
1996. Logical Structure of Asymmetric Marriage Systems. L’Homme 36 (139): 109-124.
Hammel, Eugene A.
1981. Comment on Martin. Current Anthropology 22 (4): 407-408.
HAVE
Hammel, Eugene A., and H. Goldberg.
1971. Parallel Cousin Marriage. Man 3: 488-489.
Hanson, Allan F., and Floyd Miller.
1977. The Wife’s Brother's Wife and the Marriage Contract: A Structural Analysis.
Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 133 (1): 11-22.
Héritier, Françoise.
HAVE
1977. Contribution à la théorie de l’alliance. Comment fonctionnent les systémes
d’alliance Omaha. Informatique et Sciences Humaines 29: 10-46.
Heusch, Luc de.
1971a. Pourquoi épouser celle-ci plutôt que celle-là. In Pourquoi l’Épouser? Et Autres
Essais, par Luc de Heusch. Pp. 72-85. Paris: Gallimard.
Heusch, Luc de.
1971b. Signes, reciprocité et marxisme. In Pourquoi l’Épouser? Et Autres Essais, par
Luc de Heusch. Pp. 86-140. Paris: Gallimard. [Includes discussion of the Lévi-Straussian
theory of marriage alliance.]
Heusch, Luc de.
HAVE
1974. The Debt of the Maternal Uncle: Contribution to the Study of Complex Structures
of Kinship. Man 9 (4): 609-619.
See also Barnes, R. 1975; Heusch 1975.
Heusch, Luc de.
HAVE
1975. Elementary and Complex Structures. Man 10 (3): 472-473. [Response to Barnes,
R. 1975.]
Heusch, Luc de.
1996. Le meme et le different. L’Homme 36 (140): 101-111.
Homans, George C.
HAVE
1967. Comments on Coult’s “The Structuring of Structure.” American Anthropologist 69
(2): 229-230.
Homans, George C., and David M. Schneider.
1955. Marriage, Authority, and the Final Causes. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. 64 P.
Reprinted in: Sentiments and Activities: Essays in Social Science, by George C. Homans.
Pp. 202-256. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1962.
Review: Eggan 1956; Gluckman 1956; Lowie 1956; Needham 1956; Freeman 1957.
Howard, G. E.
1904. A History of Matrimonial Institutions. Vol. 1-3. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
“Patriarchal Theory” reprinted in Evolution of Law: Select Readings on the Origin and
Development of Legal Institutions. Vol. 2. Primitive and Ancient Legal Institutions, edited
by Albert Kocourek and John Henry. Pp. 196-214. Boston: Little, Brown, 1915.
Izard, Françoise.
1968. A propos de l’énoncé des interdits matrimoniaux. L’Homme 8 (3): 5-21.
Jacobson, Peter, and Adam H. Mathery.
1962. Mate Selection in Open Marriage Systems. International Journal of Comparative
Sociology 3: 98-123.
Josselin de Jong, J. P. B. de.
1977. Circulerend connubium en her dubbel unilineale principe. Bijdragen tot de Taal-,
Land- en Volkenkunde 120: 181-194.
Kasakoff, Alice B.
1974. How Many Relatives? In Genealogical Mathematics, edited by Paul A. Ballonoff.
Pp. 215-235. Paris and The Hague: Mouton. [Marriage rules and demography.]
Kehoe, Alice B.
HAVE
1964. A Worm’s-Eye View of Marriage, Authority, and Final Causes or, What Underlies
Structure and Sentiment? American Anthropologist 66 (2): 405-407.
Kirchhoff, Paul.
1932. Verwandtschaftsbezeichnungen und Verwandtenheirat. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie
64: 41-71.
Kloos, Peter.
1977. Duolineaire afstamming en het matrilaterale cross-cousin huwelijk. Bijdragen tot
de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 119: 287-300.
Kloos, Peter.
1978. Duolineaire afstamming en het matrilaterale cross-cousin huwelijk: Repliek.
Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 120: 368-375.
Kohler, Josef.
1906. Über Totemismus und Urehe. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft
19: 171-188.
Kohler, Josef.
1905. Nochmals über Gruppenehe und Totemismus. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende
Rechtswissenschaft 21: 252-267.
Lancaster, Roger.
HAVE
2005. Text, Subtext, and Context: Strategies for Reading Alliance Theory. American
Ethnologist 32 (1): 22-27.
Lane, Barbara S.
1960. Varieties of Cross-Cousin Marriage and Incest Taboos: Structure and Causality. In
Essays in the Science of Culture in Honor of Leslie A. White, edited by Gertrude E. Dole
and Robert L. Carneiro. Pp. 288-301. New York: Crowell.
Lane, Barbara S.
1961. Structural Contrasts between Symmetric and Asymmetric Marriage Systems: A
Fallacy. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 17 (1): 49-55.
Lane, Barbara S.
1962. Jural Authority and Affinal Exchange. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 18
(2): 184-197.
Lane, Robert B.
1962. Patrilateral Cross-Cousin Marriage: Structural Analysis and Ethnographic Cases.
Ethnology 1 (4): 467-499.
Lathrop, G. Mark.
HAVE
Lave, Jean C.
HAVE
1966. A Formal Analysis of Preferential Marriage with the Sister's Daughter. Man 1 (2):
185-200.
Leach, Edmund R.
1957. On Asymmetrical Marriage Systems. American Anthropologist 59: 343.
Leach, Edmund R.
HAVE
1952. The Structural Implications of Matrilateral Cross-Cousin Marriage. Journal of the
Royal Anthropological Institute 81 (1-2): 23-55
Reprinted in: Rethinking Anthropology, by Edmund R. Leach. Pp. 54-104. London and
New York: Athlone Press.
Excerpted under the title “An Alternative Theory” in: Readings in Kinship and Social
Structure, edited by Nelson Graburn. Pp. 223-231. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
Leach, Edmund R.
1953. Bridewealth and the Stability of Marriage. Man 53 (279): 179-180.
HAVE
See also Gluckman 1953; Schneider 1953; Gluckman 1954; Watson 1954.
Leach, Edmund R.
1961. Asymmetric Marriage Rules, Status Difference, and Direct Reciprocity: Comments
on an Alleged Fallacy. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 17 (4): 343-351.
[Discussion of Lane, Barbara, 1961.]
Reprinted in: Journal of Anthropological Research, 1986, 42 (3): 397-405.
Lefébure, Claude.
1981. Le mariage des cousins parallèles patrilatéraux et l’endogamie de lignée agnatique:
l’Anthropologie de la parenté face à la question de l’endogamie. In Production, Pouvoir et
Parenté dans le Monde Méditerranéen de Sumer à nos Jours. Actes du Colloque Organisé
par l’ERA 357 CNRS/EHESS, Paris, Décembre 1976, edited by Claude H. Breteau and
Nello Zagnoli. Pp. 195-207. Paris: Librarie Orientaliste Paul Guenther.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude.
HAVE
1984. Du marriage dans un degree rapproché. In Différences, Valuers, Hiérarchie: Textes
Offerts à Louis Dumont, edited by Jean-Claude Galey. Pp. 79-89. Paris: Éditions de
l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
Livingstone, Frank B.
1964. Prescriptive Patrilateral Cross-Cousin Marriage. Man 64: 56-57.
HAVE
See also Wilder 1964.
HAVE
Löffler, Lorenz G.
1967. Kriterien symmetrischer und asymmetrischer Allianzsysteme. Bijdragen tot de
Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 123: 125-133.
Löffler, Lorenz G.
2002. Male Bias in Models of Asymmetric Kinship Terminology. In Aussaaten.
Ethnologische Schriften von Lorenz G. Löffler. Ss. 205-236. Zürich: Argonaut.
Lombardi, John.
1974b. Demographic Stability of Preferential Marriage Systems. In Mathematical Models
of Social and Cognitive Structures: Contributions to the Mathematical Anthropology,
edited by Paul A. Ballonoff. Pp. 70-88. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Maccabe, Justine.
1983. FBD Marriage: Further Support for the Westermack Hypothesis of the Incest
Taboo. American Anthropologist 85 (1): 50-69.
McGee, W. J.
1896. The Beginning of Marriage. American Anthropologist 9 (11): 371-383.
Mair, L.
1976. Il Matrimonio: Un’Analisi Antropologica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Marlowe, Frank W.
2003. The Mating System of Foragers in the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample.
Cross-Cultural Research 37: 282-306. [Polygyny frequencies included.]
Martens, Francis.
HAVE
1975. A Propos de l’oncle maternel, ou Modeste proposition pour repenser le
mariage des cousins croisés. L’Homme 15 (3-4): 155-175.
Martin, John F.
HAVE
1981a. Genealogical Structures and Consanguineous Marriage. Current Anthropology 22
(4): 401-412.
Comments: Atkins & Denham 1981; Barnard 1981; Hammel 1981; Lathrop 1981;
Livingstone 1981; Reid 1981; Shapiro 1981; Testart 1981.
Reply: Martin 1981b.
Martin, John F.
1981b. Reply. Current Anthropology 22 (4): 410-411.
HAVE
Mauss, Marcel.
1920. L’extension du potlatch en Mélanesie. L’Anthropologie 30: 396-397. [P. 396:
exogamy as the exchange of women between clans.]
HAVE
Maybury-Lewis, David.
1965. Prescriptive Marriage Rules. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 21: 207-230.
Métais, Pierre.
1956. Mariage et Équilibre Social dans les Sociétés Primitives. Paris: Imprimerie
Nationale.
Review: W.B. 1963.
Muller, Jean-Claude.
1980. Straight Sister-Exchange and the Transition from Elementary to Complex
Structures. American Ethnologist 7 (3): 518-529.
HAVE
Murphy, Robert F., and Leonard Kasdan.
1959. The Structure of Parallel Cousin Marriage. American Anthropologist 61 (1): 17-29.
Murstein, B. I., M. Cerreto, and M. G. MacDonald.
1977. A Theory and Investigation of the Effect of Exchange-Orientation on Marriage and
Friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family 39: 543-548. [Cross-listed in
DEMOGRAPHY-ECONOMY-SOCIOLOGY.]
Needham, Rodney.
1958. The Formal Analysis of Prescriptive Patrilateral Cross-Cousin Marriage.
Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 14: 199-219.
Needham, Rodney.
1961. Notes on the Analysis of Asymmetric Alliance. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land en
Volkenkunde 117: 93-117. [Critique of Berting and Philipsen.]
Needham, Rodney.
HAVE
1962. Notes on Comparative Method and Prescriptive Alliance. Bijdragen tot de Taal-,
Land en Volkenkunde 118: 160-182.
Needham, Rodney.
1963. Some Disputed Points in the Study of Prescriptive Alliance. Southwestern Journal
of Anthropology 19 (2): 186-207. [Reply to Coult 1962.]
Needham Rodney.
1973. Prescription. Oceania. 43 (2): 166-181.
Needham, Rodney.
1980. Dual Sovereignty. In Reconnaissances, by Rodney Needham. Pp. 63-106. Toronto,
etc.: University of Toronto Press. [Pp. 79-88: asymmetries in the systems of kinship and
alliance. Purum, Karo, Lamet, Ryukyuans.]
Needham, Rodney.
1986. Alliance. Oceania 56 (3): 165-180.
HAVE
Ottenheimer, Martin.
1984. Some Problems and Prospects in Residence and Marriage. American Anthropologist
86 (2): 351-358.
Parkin, Robert J.
1992. Asymétrie dualiste ou opposition hiérarchique? Le legs de Robert Hertz dans le
travail de Rodney Needham et de Louis Dumont. Recherches Sociologiques 23 (2): 4368.
Peletz, Michael G.
2004. Discourses of Opposition to Marriage Equality. Anthropology News 45 (6): 23-24.
Pfeffer, Georg.
1985. Formen der Ehe: Ethnologische Typologie der Heiratsbeziehungen. In Die Braut.
Geliebt - Verkauft - Getauscht - Geraubt. Zur Rolle der Frau im Kulturvergleich,
herausgegeben von Gisela Völger und Karin v. Welck. Ss. 60-71. Köln: RautenstrauchJoest-Museum. (Ethnologica 11 (1)).
Powell, John W.
HAVE
1884. Tribal Marriage Law. In 3rd Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology to
the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1881-1882. Pp. LVI-LXII. Washington:
Government Printing Office.
Reprinted in: Evolution of Law: Select Readings on the Origin and Development of Legal
Institutions. Vol. 2. Primitive and Ancient Legal Institutions, edited by Albert Kocourek
and John Henry. Pp. 277-283. Boston: Little, Brown, 1915.
Reid, Russell M.
HAVE
Renard-Casewitz, France-Marie.
1998-1999. Acerca de algunas teorias sobre parentesco y alianza: El matrimonio entre la
hija dela hermana del padre y el hijo del hermano de la madre. Revista Antropológica 16
(7): 21-62.
Rivière, Peter G.
1966a. A Note on Marriage With the Sister’s Daughter. Man 1 (4): 550-556.
HAVE
Rivière, Peter G.
HAVE
1966b. Oblique Discontinuous Exchange: A New Formal Type of Prescriptive Alliance.
American Anthropologist 68 (3): 738-740.
Rivière, P. G.
1971. Marriage: A Reassessment. In Rethinking Kinship and Marriage, edited by Rodney
Needham. Pp. 57-74. London, etc.: Tavistock Publications.
Salisbury, Richard F.
1956. Asymmetrical Marriage Systems. American Anthropologist 58: 639-655.
1957b. Asymmetrical Marriage Systems. Anthropos 52: 294.
1957b. On Asymmetrical Marriage Systems: Reply. American Anthropologist 59 (2):
344-346.
Schlegel, Alice, and Rohn Eloul.
1988. Marriage Transactions: Labor, Property, Status. American Anthropologist 90 (2):
291-309.
Schmidt, Wilhelm.
1952. Entstehung der Verwandtschaftssysteme und Heiratsregelungen. Anthropos 47:
767-783.
Schneider, David M.
1953. A Note on Bridewealth and the Stability of Marriage. Man 53: 75.
HAVE
See also Gluckman 1953; Leach 1953; Gluckman 1954; Watson 1954.
Shapiro, Warren.
HAVE
Spiro, Melford E.
1964. Cause, Function, and Cross-Cousin Marriage: An Essay in Anthropological
Explanation. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 49: 30-43.
Reprinted in: Theory in Anthropology: A Source-Book, edited by Robert A. Manners and
David Kaplan. Pp. 105-115. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
Talal, A.
1960. The Definition of Marriage. Man 60: 73-74.
Testart, Alain.
1981. Comment on Martin. Current Anthropology 22 (4): 409-410.
HAVE
Testart, Alain.
1993a. Quelques Considérations sur le Temps dans la Parenté et le Mariage entre
Cousins Croisés. Paris: EHESS.
Testart, Alain.
1993b. La réversibilité du temps et le mariage des cousins croisés. Social Anthropology 1
(1): 73-77.
Testart, Alain.
HAVE
2000. Quelques considerations sur le temps dans la parenté et le marriage entre les
cousins croisés. L’Homme 154-155: 547-558.
Thomson, Basil H.
1895. Concubitancy in the Classificatory System of Relationship. Journal of the
Anthropological Institute 24 (4): 371-385.
Tiger, Lionel.
1978. Omnigamy – New Kinship System. Psychology Today 12 (2): 14-17.
Titiev, Misha.
HAVE
1962. A Further Note on Cross-Cousin Marriage. American Anthropologist 64 (2): 379380. [Critique of Eyde and Postal 1961.]
Tjon Sie Fat, Franklin E.
HAVE
1998. Local Rules and Global Structures: Models of Exclusive Straight Sister-Exchange.
In Kinship, Networks, and Exchange, edited by Thomas Schweizer, and Douglas R.
White. Pp. 261-276. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Trautmann, Thomas R.
2003. Patterns of Marriage. In The Oxford India Companion to Sociology and
Social Anthropology, edited by Veena Das. Pp. 1104-1126. New Delhi: Oxford
University Press.
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo.
1993. Structures, régimes, stratégies. L’Homme 33 (125, 1): 116-137.
HAVE
See also Copet-Rougier & Héritier-Augé 1993.
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo.
1994. Une mauvaise querelle. L’Homme 34 (126, 1): 181-191.
HAVE
Wake, Charles S.
1873-1875. Marriage by Capture. Anthropologia 1: 73-78.
Wake, Charles S.
1873-1875. Marriage among Primitive Peoples. Anthropologia 1: 197-207.
Wake, Charles S.
1883. The Nature and Origin of Group Marriage. Journal of the Anthropological Institute
13: 151-161.
Walle, E. van der.
1972. Marriage and Marital Fertility. In Population and Social Change, edited by D. V.
Glass and R. Revelle. Pp. 137-151. London. [Cross-listed in DEMOGRAPHYECONOMY-SOCIOLOGY.]
Watson, William.
1954. Bridewealth and the Stability of Marriage. Man 54 (97): 67-68
See also Gluckman 1953; Leach 1953; Gluckman 1954; Schneider 1953.
Weiner, Annette B.
HAVE
1982. Sexuality among the Anthropologists: Reproduction among the Informants. Social
Analysis 12: 52-65.
Westermarck, Edward.
1889. The History of Human Marriage. Part I. The Origin of Human Marriage.
Helsingfors: Frenckell & Son. 161 P.
1891. The History of Human Marriage. London and New York: Macmillan. 644 P.
1926. A Short History of Marriage. London: Macmillan. 325 P.
Wilder, William.
HAVE
1964. Livingstone’s Definition of Prescriptive Patrilateral Cross-Cousin Marriage. Man
64: 119-120.
See Livingstone 1964.
Wilken. G. A.
1880-1881. Over de primitieve vormen van het huwelijk en den oorsprong van het gezin.
Indische Gids 2 (1880): 601-664; 3 (1880): 1177-1205; 2 (1881): 232-283.
Reprinted in: De Verspreide Geschriften, van G. A. Wilken. D.1. Pp. 121-285. Semarang,
Soerabaja and ’s-Gravenhage: Van Dorp, 1912.
Wilson-Haffenden, J. R.
HAVE
1931. “Espousal Fee”: An Alternative Term for "Bride-Price.” Man 31 (166): 163-164.
COUSIN MARRIAGE
CROSS-COUSIN MARRIAGE
Seligman, Brenda Z.
1925. Cross-Cousin Marriage. Man 25 (70): 114-121.
EXOGAMY/ENDOGAMY
Crawley, A. E.
1907. Exogamy and the Mating of Cousins. In Anthropological Essays Presented to
Edward Burnett Tylor in Honour of His 75th Birthday Oct. 2 1907. Pp. 51-64. Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Durkheim, Émile.
1898. La prohibition de l’inceste et ses origins. Année Sociologique 1: 1-70.
English translation: Incest: The Nature and Origin of the Taboo. Translated by Edward
Sagarin. New York: L. Stuart, 1963.
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E.
1963. Nuer Rules of Exogamy and Incest. In Social Structure: Studies Presented to A. R.
Radcliffe-Brown, edited by Meyer Fortes. Pp. 85-103. New York: Russell&Russell.
Frazer, James G.
1910. Totemism and Exogamy: A Treatise on Certain Early Forms of Superstition and
Society. London: Macmillan.
Reviews: Kelsey 1911; J. T. S. 1912.
Frazer, James G.
1937. Totemica: A Supplement to Totemism and Exogamy. London: Macmillan.
Gomme, Laurence, and Andrew Lang.
1911. Totemism and Exogamy. Folklore 22 (4): 486-491.
Kang, Gay E.
1976. Solidarity Theory: A Cross-Cultural Test of the Relationships between Exogamy,
Cross-Allegiance, Peace, and Survival Value. Ph.D. dissertation. State University of New
York at Buffalo.
Kang, Gay E.
HAVE
1979a. Exogamy and Peace Relations of Social Units: A Cross-Cultural Test. Ethnology
18 (1): 85-99.
Kang, Gay E.
1979b. The Nature of Exogamy in Relation to Cross-Allegiance/Alliance of Social Units.
Behavior Science Research 14: 255-276.
Kettel, David.
1982. Cognition and Contradiction: On the Origin of Incest Taboos and Oedipal
Fantasies. Dialectical Anthropology 7 (1): 31-45. [Cross-listed in PSYCHOLOGY.]
Lang, Andrew
1913. Mr. Andrew Lang’s Theory of the Origin of Exogamy and Totemism. Folklore 24
(2): 155-186.
1969. Genetics, Ecology and the Origins of Incest and Exogamy. Current Anthropology
10 (1): 45-61.
Loeb, E. M., and G. Toffelmier.
1939. Kin Marriage and Exogamy. Journal of General Psychology 20: 181-228
Löffler, Lorenz G.
1972. Inzest und Exogamie. Homo 23, 4: 351-365.
Reprinted in Aussaaten. Ethnologische Schriften von Lorenz G. Löffler. Ss. 341-360.
Zürich: Argonaut.
McLennan, John F.
1866. Bride-Catching. Argosy 2: 31-42.
McLennan, John F.
1877. Exogamy and Endogamy. Fortnightly Review 121: 884-895.
Rejoinder: Spencer 1877.
Makarius, Raoul, and Laura Makarius.
HAVE
1961. L’Origine de l’Exogamie et du Totemisme. Paris: Gallimard. 382 P.
Malinowski, Bronisław.
1911-1919. Totemizm i egzogamia (Z powódu ksiązki J. G. Frazera). Lud 17: 31-56; 18:
14-57; 19: 153-171. Lwow.
Translated in: The Early Writings of Bronislaw Malinowski, edited by Robert Thornton
and Peter Skalník. Translated by Ludwik Krzyźanowski. Pp. 123-199. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Schmidt, Wilhelm.
1952. Eine neue Erklärung des problems der Exogamie. Anthropos 47: 659-664.
Schmidt, Wilhelm.
HAVE
1931. Ursprung und Arten der Exogamie und der Heiratsverbote. In Semaine
Internationale d’Ethnologie Religieuse, 5th session, Luxemburg, 1929. Compte rendu.
Pp. 327-343. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner.
Seligman, Brenda Z.
1935. The Incest Taboo as a Social Regulation. Sociological Review 27 (1): 75-93.
Seligman, Brenda Z.
1950. Incest and Exogamy: A Reconsideration. American Anthropologist 52 (2): 305316.
Spencer, Herbert.
1877. A Short Rejoinder. Fortnightly Review 21: 902. [See McLennan 1877.]
Thomas, Northcote W.
1907. The Origin of Exogamy. In Anthropological Essays Presented to Edward Burnett
Tylor in Honour of His 75th Birthday Oct. 2 1907. Pp. 343-354. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wagner, Roy.
HAVE
1972. Incest and Identity: A Critique and Theory on the Subject of Exogamy and Incest
Prohibition. Man 7 (4): 601-613.
Wagner, Roy.
2000. The Reprojective Basis of Human Society (The 16th Edvard Westermarck Memorial
Lecture). Suomen Antropologi 1: 4-14.
Walter, Alex.
2000. From Westermark’s Effect to Fox’s Law: Paradox and Principle in the Relationship
between Incest Taboos and Exogamy. Social Science Information 39 (3): 467-488.
Westermarck, Edward, and Andrew Lang.
1911. Totemism and Exogamy. Folklore 22 (1): 81-93.
HETEROGAMY/HOMOGAMY
Booth, A., D. R. Johnson, A. Branaman, and A. Sica.
1995. Belief and Behavior: Does Religion Matter in Today’s Marriage. Journal of
Marriage and the Family 57: 661-671.
Burchinal, L. B., and L. E. Chancellor.
1963. Survival Rates among Religiously Homogamous and Interreligious Marriages.
Social Forces 41: 353-362.
Glenn, N. D., S. K. Hope, and D. Weiner.
1974. Social Class Heterogamy and Marital Success: A Study of the Empirical Adequacy
of a Textbook Generalization. Social Problems 21: 539-550.
Kalmijn, Matthijs.
1991. Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy. American
Sociological Review 56: 786-800.
Kalmijn, Matthijs.
1998. Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends. Annual Review of
Sociology 24: 395-421.
Lehrer, Evelyn, and Carmel U. Chiswick.
1993. Religion as a Determinant of Marital Stability. Demography 30: 385-404.
Qian, Z.
1997. Breaking the Racial Barriers: Variations in Interracial Marriage Between 1980 and
1990. Demography 34: 263-276.
Shehan, C. L., W. Bock, and G. R. Lee.
1990. Religious Heterogamy, Religiosity, and Marital Happiness: The Case of Catholics.
Journal of Marriage and the Family 52: 73-79.
Tynes, S. R.
1990. Educational Heterogamy and Marital Satisfaction Between Spouses. Social Science
Research 19: 153-174.
INCEST
GENERAL
Aberle, David F., Bronfenbrenner, U., Hess, E. H., Miller, D. R., Schneider, David M.,
and Spuhler, J. N.
1963. The Incest Taboo and the Mating Patterns of Animals. American Anthropologist 65
(2): 253-265.
Reprinted in: Readings in Kinship and Social Structure, edited by Nelson Graburn. Pp.
346-355. New York: Harper & Row, 1971; Issues in Cultural Anthropology: Selected
Readings, edited by David W. McCurdy and James P. Spradley. Pp. 111-121. Boston and
Toronto: Little, Brown, 1979.
Berghe, Pierre van der.
1981. Comment on Bisler’s “Incest Avoidance as a Function of Environment and
Heredity.” Current Anthropology 22 (6): 649.
Bixler, Ray H.
1981. The Incest Controversy. Psychological Reports 49: 67-283.
Bixler, Ray H.
HAVE
1983. The Multiple Meanings of “Incest.” Journal of Sex Research 83 (19): 197-201.
Bonte, Pierre.
1995. Prohibition de l’inceste et structures familiales. Qu’en est-il de l’universel? In La
Famille des Sciences à l'Éthique. Pp. 87-97. Paris, Bayard Editions/Centurion.
Bowman, Glen.
1977. Symbolic Incest and Social Intercourse: Kula and Community in Kiriwina. Journal
of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 8 (3): 156-170.
Burling, Robbins.
1985. Garo Marriage to the Wife’s Daughter: Further Support for the Westermarck
Hypothesis for the Origin of the Incest Taboo. American Anthropologist 87 (1): 130-133.
Coult, Allan D.
1963. Causality and Cross-Sex Prohibitions. American Anthropologist 65 (2): 266-277.
Davies, K.
1941. Intermarriage in Caste Societies. American Anthropologist 43 (2): 376-395.
DeMause, Lloyd.
1961. The Universality of Incest. Journal of Psychohistory 19: 123-164.
Ellis, Albert.
1963. The Origins and the Development of the Incest Taboo. In Incest: Its Nature and
Origin of the Taboo, by Emile Durkheim. Pp. 121-174. New York: Lyle Stuart.
Erasmus, Charles J.
1950. Current Theories on Incest Prohibition in the Light of Ceremonial Kinship.
Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 2: 42-50. [Cross-listed in ADOPTION.]
Fischer, Th. H.
1950. The Concept of Incest in Sumatra. American Anthropologist 52: 219-224.
Fischer, Th. H.
1960. Neo-Morganisms en Incest. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 116:
150-157.
Fox, J. R.
1962. Sibling Incest. British Journal of Sociology 13: 128-150.
Fox, Robin.
1980. The Red Lamp of Incest. New York: Dutton.
Fox, Robin.
1983. The Red Lamp of Incest: An Enquiry into the Origins of Mind and Society. Notre
Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Freud, Sigmund.
1912-1913. Totem und Tabu: Einige Übereinstimmungen im Seelenleben der Wilden und
der Neurotiker. Imago 1 (11):
Freud, Sigmund.
1918. Totem and Taboo: Resemblances between the Psychic Lives of Savages and
Neurotics. Translated from the German by Abraham A. Brill. New York: Moffat, Yard.
[English translation of Freud 1912-1913.]
“The Origin of the Incest Taboo” reprinted in: Readings in Kinship and Social Structure,
edited by Nelson Graburn. Pp. 47-50. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
Godelier, Maurice.
1987. Inceste: L’interdit originel. Entrevue avec Guitta Pessis-Pasternak. Le Monde
(August 26): 11-12.
Godelier, Maurice.
1988a. Interdiction de l’inceste et naissance de la société humaine. Journal des
Psychologues (Special issue “Cultures et Personnalité”): 14-18.
Godelier, Maurice.
1988b. La prohibition de l’inceste ou le débordement de la parenté. Journal des
Psychologues (Special issue “Cultures et Personnalité”): 25-32.
Godelier, Maurice.
1989. Incest Taboo and the Evolution of Society. In Evolution and Its Influence, edited
by Alan Grafen. Pp. 63-92. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Godelier, Maurice.
1990. Inceste, parenté, pouvoir. Psychanalystes 36: 33-51.
Godelier, Maurice.
1996. Inceste: L’interdit originel. In Le Social et les Paradoxes du Chaos. Entretiens avec
Guitta Pessis-Pasternak. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
Godelier, Maurice.
1997. Liens de parenté, tabou de l’inceste et polygamie. Sciences et Avenir (Avril): 9093.
Goody, Jack.
1956. A Comparative Approach to Incest and Adultery. British Journal of Sociology 7:
286-305.
Excerpted under the title Incest and Adultery in: Kinship: Selected Readings, edited by
Jack Goody. Pp. 64-81. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1971.
Green, André.
1999. Inceste et parricide en anthropologie et en psychanalyse. In La Production du
Social: Autour de Maurice Godelier, edited by Philippe Descola, Jacques Hamel and
Pierre Lemonnier. Pp. 213-232. Paris: Fayard.
Hendrix, Lewellyn, and Mark A. Schneider.
1999. Assumptions on Sex and Society in the Biosocial Theory of Incest. Cross-Cultural
Research 1999 33: 193-218.
1979. Symbolique de l’inceste et de sa prohibition. In La Fonction Symbolique: Essais
d’Anthropologie, edited by Michel Izard and Pierre Mith. Pp. 209-243. Paris: Gallimard.
1994. Les Deux Soeurs et Leur Mère: Athropologie de l’Inceste. Paris: Éditions Odile
Jacob. 376 P.
Reviews: Pawlik 1995; Heusch 1996.
English translation: Two Sisters and Their Mother: The Anthropology of Incest. New
York: Zone Books, 2002.
Review: Parkin 2001.
Hiatt, L. R.
1964. Incest in Arnhem Land. Oceania 35: 124-128.
Kortmulder, K.
1968. An Ethnological Theory of the Incest Taboo and Exogamy. Current Anthropology
9: 437-449.
Layard, John.
1945. The Incest Taboo and the Virgin Archetype. Eranos Jahrbuch 12: 254-307.
Leavitt, Gregory C.
1990. Sociobiological Explanations of Incest Avoidance: A Critical Review of Evidential
Claims. American Anthropologist 92: 971-993.
Leavitt, Gregory C.
1992. Inbreeding Fitness: A Reply to Uhlmann. American Anthropologist 94: 448-449.
See Uhlmann 1992.
Lieberman, Debra, John Tooby, and Leda Cosmides.
2003. Does Morality Have a Biological Basis? An Empirical Test of the Factors
Governing Moral Sentiments Relating to Incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of
London. Biological Sciences 270 (1517): 819-826.
Löffler, Lorenz G.
1993. Wieso ist Inzest tabu? Das Thema im Blick des Ethnologen. In Inzest und
sexueller Mißbrauch. Beratung und Therapie, herausgegeben von G. Ramin. Ss. 11-29.
Paderborn.
Reprinted in Aussaaten. Ethnologische Schriften von Lorenz G. Löffler. Ss. 361-376.
Zürich: Argonaut.
Makarius, Raoul.
1966. Incest and Redemption in Arnhem Land. Oceania 37: 148-152.
Malinowski, Bronislaw.
1940. A Sociological Analysis of the Rationale of the Prohibited Degrees in Marriage. In
Kindred and Affinity as Impediments to Marriage, being a report of a Commission
appointed by His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury. Pp. 101-106. London: Society for
Promoting Christian Knowledge.
Meigs, Anna.
2002. Beyond the Taboo: Imagining Incest. American Anthropologist 104 (1): 38-49.
Merton, Robert.
1941. Intermarriage and Social Structure: Fact and Theory. Psychiatry 4: 361-374.
Moiseeff, Marika.
1987. Entre maternité et procreation: L’inceste. Patio 7: 121-145. Paris: Evel.
Oesterlé, Gérard.
1937. Inceste. In Dictionnaire de Spiritualité. Paris: C. Beauchesne et Ses Fils.
Parkin, Robert J.
1990. Ladders and Circles: Affinal Alliance and the Problem of Hierarchy. Man 25 (3):
472-488.
Parsons, Talcott.
1954. The Incest Taboo in Relation to Social Structure and the Socialization of the Child.
British Journal of Sociology 5: 101-117.
Pastner, Carol McC.
1986. The Westermarck Hypothesis and First Cousin Marriage: The Cultural Modification
of Negative Sexual Imprinting. Journal of Anthropological Research 42 (4): 573-586.
Patterson, Mary.
2004. Coming too Close, Going too Far: Theoretical and Cross-cultural Approaches to
Incest and its Prohibitions. Australian Journal of Anthropology 16 (1): 95-115. (Special
Issue: “Paradigms Lost? The Study of Kinship in the 21st Century.”)
Popenoe, P.
1923. The Marriage of Kin. Scientific Monthly 17: 427-434.
Santiago, Luciano.
1973. The Children of Oedipus: Brother-Sister Incest in Psychiatry, Literature, History,
and Mythology. New York: Libra.
Sarga, J.
1970. The Origin of the Prohibition of Incest. Anthropological Journal of Canada 8 (3):
16-26.
Schapera, Isaac.
1957. Marriage of Near Kin among the Tswana. Africa 27: 139-160.
Schapera, Isaac.
1963. The Tswana Conception of Incest. In Social Structure: Studies Presented to A. R.
Radcliffe-Brown, edited by Meyer Fortes. Pp. 104-120. New York: Russell & Russell.
Scheidel, Walter.
2002. Brother-Sister and Parent-Child Marriage in Premodern Societies. In Human Mate
Choice and Prehistoric Marital Networks, edited by Kenichi Aoki and Takeru Akazawa.
Pp. 33-48. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.
Schneider, David M.
1967. The Meaning of Incest. Journal of the Polynesian Society 85: 149-169.
Seligman, Brenda Z.
1931-1932. The Incest Barrier: Its Role in Social Organization. British Journal of
Psychology 22: 250-276.
Seligman, Brenda Z.
1935. The Incest Taboo as a Social Regulation. Sociological Review 27: 75-93.
Shepher, Joseph.
1983. Incest: A Biosocial View. New York, etc.: Academic Press. 213 P.
Silverman, Martin G.
1977. Relations of Production, the Incest and Menstrual Tabus among Pre-Colonial
Barnabans and Gilbertese. Anthropologica 19 (1): 89-97. Ottawa.
Slater, Mariam K.
1959. Ecological Factors in the Origin of Incest. American Anthropologist 61: 10421059.
337-345. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.
Twitchell, James B.
1987. Forbidden Partners: The Incest Taboo in Modern Culture. New York: Columbia
University Press.
Uhlmann, Allon J.
1992. A Critique of Leavitt’s Review of Sociobiological Explanations of Incest
Avoidance. American Anthropologist 94: 446-448.
See Leavitt 1990, 1992.
Van der Berghe, Pierre L.
1983. Human Inbreeding Avoidance: Culture in Nature. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
6: 91-123.
White, Leslie A.
1948. The Definition and Prohibition of Incest. American Anthropologist 61: 1042-1059.
325-337. New York: Harper & Row, 1971; Issues in Cultural Anthropology: Selected
Readings, edited by David W. McCurdy and James P. Spradley. Pp. 95-110. Boston and
Toronto: Little, Brown, 1979.
Wilken. G. A.
1890. Huwelijken tusschen Bloedverwanten. Indische Gids 54 (2): 478-521.
Reprinted in: De Verspreide Geschriften, van G. A. Wilken. D.2. Pp. 309-352. Semarang,
Soerabaja and ’s-Gravenhage: Van Dorp, 1912.
Wolf, Arthur P.
1970. Childhood Association and Sexual Attraction: A Further Test of the Westermarck
Hypothesis. American Anthropologist 72: 503-515.
Reprinted in: Issues in Cultural Anthropology: Selected Readings, edited by David W.
McCurdy and James P. Spradley. Pp. 122-135. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown, 1979.
See also Wolf 1966 (SINO-TIBETAN).
Wolf, Arthur P.
2002. Reformulating (Yet Again) the Incest Avoidance Problem. In Human Mate Choice
and Prehistoric Marital Networks, edited by Kenichi Aoki and Takeru Akazawa. Pp. 4960. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.
COMPARATIVE
Bixler, Ray H.
1982a. Comment on the Incidence and Purpose of Royal Sibling Incest. American
Ethnologist 9 (3): 580-582.
Bixler, Ray H.
HAVE
1982b. Sibling Incest in the Royal Families of Egypt, Peru, and Hawaii. Journal of Sex
Research 18: 264-281.
FATHER-DAUGHTER
Herman, Judith.
1982. Father-Daughter Incest. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
CHURCH
COLLECTIONS
Trumbach, Randolph. (ed.)
1985. The Marriage Prohibitions Controversy: Five Tracts. New York: Garland.
GENERAL
Alleyne, John.
1775. The Legal Degrees of Marriage Stated and Considered, in a Series of Letters to a
Friend. London: Printed for J. Almon, T. Durham; J. Fox; J. Williams; W. Harris; and F.
Blythe. 50 P.
Reprinted in: The Marriage Prohibitions Controversy: Five Tracts, edited by Randolph
Trumbach. New York: Garland, 1985.
Boyer, Pierre D.
1817. Examen du Pouvoir Legislatif de l’Eglise sur le Marriage, où l'on Relève
Quelques-Unes des Erreurs du Livre Intitule: Principes sur la Distinction du Contrat et
du Sacrement de Marriage, avec un Dissertation sur la Reception du Concile de Trente
dans l’Eglise de France. Paris: Le Clere.
Clericus.
1827. Reasons in Favour of the Erasure of the Law that Forbids a Man to Marry His
Deceased Wife’s Sister: In a Second Letter to a Clergyman of the Reformed Dutch
Church. New York: G. and C. Carvill.
Church of England.
1940. Kindred and Affinity as Impediments to Marriage, being the Report of a
Commission Appointed by His Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury. London: Society for
Promoting Christian Knowledge. 155 P.
Cooke, Parsons.
1842. The Marriage Question, or, The Lawfulness of Marrying the Sister of a Deceased
Wife Considered. Boston: S. N. Dickinson. 32 P.
Domesticus. (McClelland, Alexander.)
1826. The Doctrine of Incest Stated, with an Examination of the Question Whether a Man
May Marry His Deceased Wife’s Sister, in a Letter to a Clergyman of the Presbyterian
Church. Carlisle: J. Tizzard & J. Crever. 48 P.
Reprinted in: New York: G. and C. Carvill, 1827.
Dugard, Samuel.
1673. The Marriages of Cousin Germans, Vindicated from the Censures of
Unlawfullnesse, and Inexpediency. Oxford: Thomas Bowman.
Fry, John.
1756. The Case of Marriages Between Near Kindred. London: J. Whiston & B. White.
Johnstoun, James.
1734. A Juridical Dissertation Concerning the Scripture Doctrine of Marriage Contracts,
and the Marriages of Cousin-Germans. London: Printed for the Author. 39 P.
Livingston, John H.
1816. A Dissertation on the Marriage of a Man with His Sister In Law. New-Brunswick:
Deare & Myer. 179 P.
Milledoler, Philip.
1843. Dissertation on Incestuous Marriage. New York: H. Ludwig. 46 P.
Quick, John.
1703. A Serious Inquiry Into That Weighty Case of Conscience, Whether a Man May
Lawfully Marry His Deceased Wife’s Sister: Table of Marriage Set Forth by Order of the
Most R. R. Dr. Parker, and Dr. Sheldon L. L. Archbishops of Canterbury. London:
Printed for J. Lawrence at the Golden Angel in the Poultry, and R. Parker under the
Royal Exchange. 40 P.
Veritas. (Plumer, William.)
1827. Remarks on the Letter of Domesticus, Containing the Doctrine of Incest Stated,
with an Examination of the Question “Whether a Man May Marry His Deceased Wife’s
Sister.” New York: G. and C. Carvill. 40 P.
Webster, Noah.
1790. Explanation of Reezons Why Marriage Iz Prohibited Between natural Relations. In
Collection of Essays and Fugitiv Writings on Moral, Historical, Political and Religious
Subjects, by Noah Webster. Pp. 322-324. Boston: Thomas & Andrews.
LAW
Barton, Chris.
1987. Incest and the Prohibited Degrees. New Law Journal 137: 502-504.
Bratt, Carolyn S.
HAVE
1984. Incest Statutes and the Fundamental Right of Marriage: Is Oedipus Free to Marry?
Family Law Quarterly 18: 257-309.
Buck, Trevor.
1987. The Marriage (Prohibited Degrees of Relationship) Act 1986. New Law Journal
17: 68-70.
Chester, Robert, and Martin Parry.
1983. Reform of the Prohibitions on Marriage of Related Persons. New Law Journal 13:
237-242.
Chotiner, Renee D.
1974. Marriage and the Supreme Court. Washington, DC: Today Publications and New
Service.
Clark, Homer H.
1968. The Law of Domestic Relations in the United States. St. Paul, Minn.: West.
Hafen, Bruce C.
1983. The Constitutional Status of Marriage, Kinship, and Sexual Privacy: Balancing the
Individual and Social Interests. Michigan Law Review 81: 463.
Indovina, Frank J., and John E. Dalton.
1945. Statutes of All States and Territories on Marriage, Annulment, Divorce (with 1956
Supplement). Santa Monica: Law Publishing.
Keezer, Frank H.
1906. The Law of Marriage and Divorce. Boston: W. J. Nagel. 609 P.
Keezer, Frank H.
1923. A Treatise on the Law of Marriage and Divorce. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. 1079
P.
Keezer, Frank H.
1950. Supplement to Keezer on the Law of Marriage and Divorce. Indianapolis: BobbsMerrill Co. 56 P.
Mackay, Richard V.
1957. Law of Marriage and Divorce Simplified. New York: Oceana.
Morland, John W.
1946. Keezer on the Law of Marriage and Divorce: Breach of Promise, Common Law
Marriage, Estates by Entireties, Annulment, Alimony, Custody, and Maintenance of
Children, Jurisdiction, Procedure, Forms, Statutory Summaries. Indianapolis: BobbsMerrill Co. 1367 P.
Morton, James.
1988. The Incest Act 1909 – Was It Ever Relevant? New Law Journal 138: 59-60.
O’Donnell, William, and David A. Jones.
1982. The Law of Marriage and Marital Alternatives. Lexington: Books.
Sickels, Robert.
1972. Race, Marriage, and the Law. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Siegle, Bernard A.
1979. Marriage Today. New York: Alba House.
Wadlington, Walter.
1984. Cases and Other Materials on Domestic Relations. Mineola, NY: Foundation
Press.
Wise, Stuart M.
1983. An Act of Love. National Law Journal 5: 47.
Wolfram, Sybil.
1983. Eugenics and the Punishment of Incest Act 1908. Criminal Law Review (May):
308-316.
POLYGAMY
GENERAL
Campbell, James.
1870. Polygamy: Its Influence on Sex and Population. Journal of Anthropology 1 (2):
192-197.
LEVIRATE/SORORATE
Aiyappan, A.
1932. Polyandry. Man 32 (337)
Fischer, H. Th.
1952. Polyandry. Internationales Archiv für Ethnographie 46: 106-115.
McLennan, John F.
1877. The Levirate and Polyandry. Fortnightly Review 121: 694-707.
Vanderyst, H.
1922. La polyandry existe-t-elle au Congo? Congo 1: 353-355.
POLYGYNY
GENERAL
Barber, Nigel.
HAVE
2008. Explaining Cross-National Differences in Polygyny Intensity: Resource-Defense,
Sex Ratio, and Infectious Diseases. Cross-Cultural Research 42: 103-117.
Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique.
1994. On Polygyny and Sex Ratio at Birth: An Evaluation of Whiting’s Study. Current
See Whiting 1993.
Dickemann, Mildred.
1982. Comment on Hartung. Current Anthropology 23 (1): 8-9.
HAVE
See Hartung 1982; Hartung 1983.
Dow, Malcolm M.
2008. Network Autocorrelation Regression With Binary and Ordinal Dependent
Variables: Galton's Problem. Cross-Cultural Research 42: 394-419. [Polygyny is used as
an example.]
Dow, Malcolm M., and E. Anthon Eff.
HAVE
2009. Cultural Trait Transmission and Missing Data as Sources of Bias in Cross-Cultural
Survey Research: Explanations of Polygyny Re-examined. Cross-Cultural Research 43:
134-151.
Hartung, John.
HAVE
1982a. Polygyny and Inheritance of Wealth. Current Anthropology 23 (1): 1-12.
Comments: Dickemann 1982; Melotti 1982; Pospisil 1982; Scarduelli 1982; Scott 1982;
Smith 1982; Wilder 1982.
Replies: Hartung 1982b; Hartung 1982c; Hartung 1983.
Hartung, John.
1982b. Reply. Current Anthropology 23 (1): 11.
HAVE
Hartung, John.
1982c. Reply to Scarduelli. Current Anthropology 23 (3): 335.
HAVE
Hartung, John.
HAVE
1983. In Defense of Murdock: A Reply to Dickeman. Current Anthropology 24 (1): 125126. [Polygyny and wealth.]
Korotayev, Andrey, and Dmitri Bondarenko.
HAVE
2000. Polygyny and Democracy: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Cross-Cultural Research
34: 190-208.
Melotti, Umberto.
1982. Comment on Hartung. Current Anthropology 23 (1): 9.
HAVE
Pospisil, Leopold.
HAVE
Scarduelli, Pietro.
1982. On Polygyny and Inheritance. Current Anthropology 23 (3): 334-335.
HAVE
Scott, Eugenie C.
HAVE
Smith, John M.
HAVE
White, Douglas R.
1988. Rethinking Polygyny: Co-Wives, Codes, and Cultural Systems. Current
HAVE
White, Douglas R., and Michael L. Burton.
HAVE
1988. Causes of Polygyny: Ecology, Economy, Kinship, and Warfare. American
Anthropologist 90 (4): 871-887.
Whiting, John W. M.
HAVE
1993. The Effect of Polygyny on Sex Ratio at Birth. American Anthropologist 95 (2):
435-442.
See Borgerhoff Mulder 1994.
Wilder, William.
HAVE
POLYGYNY AND HUMAN PHENOTYPICAL VARIATION
Frost, Peter.
HAVE
1994. Geographic Distribution of Human Skin Colour: A Selective Compromise Between
Natural Selection and Sexual Selection? Human Evolution 9 (2): 141-153. [The role of
polygyny is shaping the worldwide variation in skin color.]
Frost, Peter.
HAVE
2006. European Hair and Eye Color: A Case of Frequency-Dependent Sexual Selection?
Evolution and Human Behavior 27: 85-103. [The role of polygyny is shaping the
European variation in eye and hair color.]
Frost, Peter.
2008. Sexual Selection and Human Geographic Variation. Journal of Social,
Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 2(4): 169-191.
HAVE
Ihara, Yasuo, and Kenichi Aoki.
HAVE
1999. Sexual Selection by Male Choice in Monogamous and Polygynous Human
Populations. Theoretical Population Biology 55: 77-93.
Manning, J.T., P.E. Bundred, and F.M. Mather.
HAVE
2004. Second to Fourth Digit Ratio, Sexual Selection, and Skin Colour. Evolution and
Human Behavior 25: 38-50. [The association between dark skin color and low latitude
exists only when polygynous societies are found in low latitudes.]
SIBLING MARRIAGE
Kopytoff, Igor.
1984 On the Viability of Sibling Marriages: A Comment on McCabe’s Argument.
American Anthropologist 86: 407-408.
SISTER-EXCHANGE MARRIAGE
James, Wendy R.
1975. Sister-Exchange Marriage. Scientific American 233 (6): 84-94.
STEPDAUGHTER MARRIAGE
Kroeber, Alfred L.
1940. Stepdaughter Marriage. American Anthropologist 42 (4, pt. 1): 562-570.
PROMISCUITY
Deschamps.
1924. La promiscuité est-elle primitive? Revue de l’Institut de Sociologie 5. Solvay.
Plischke, H.
1924. Die Promiscuitätslehre als völkerkundliche Problem. Japan-Deutsche Zeitschrift
für Wissenschaft und Technik 2: 463-476.
DIVORCE
Betzig, Laura.
HAVE
1989. Causes of Conjugal Dissolution: A Cross-cultural Study. Current Anthropology 30
(5): 654-676.
Jalovaara, M.
2003. The Joint Effects of Marriage Partners’ Socioeconomic Positions on the Risk of
Divorce. Demography 40: 67-81.
Jones, Frank L.
1996. Convergence and Divergence in Ethnic Divorce Patterns: A Research Note.
Journal of Marriage and the Family 58: 213-218.
Monahan, T. P., and W. M. Kephart.
1954. Divorce and Desertion by Religious and Mixed-Religious Groups. American
Journal of Sociology 59: 454-465.

ALLIANCE, INCEST AND DIVORCE ALLIANCE COLLECTED

Transcription

Documents pareils

CVB : cime vßle bßbß, Lalit Mohan Thaplyßl, 1993