european parliament
Transcription
european parliament
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DELEGATION FOR RELATIONS WITH THE MAGHREB COUNTRIES AND THE ARAB MAGHREB UNION 5th Interparliamentary Meeting EP/Algeria Report on the visit to Algeria by a working group from the Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the AMU from 18 to 22 May 2001 1. Introduction The visit took place in a particular and, in some ways, delicate context. The weeks leading up to the visit saw the first phase of the ‘events in Kabilia’, during which dozens of people were killed and hundreds injured. The EP had adopted an urgent motion for a resolution condemning these events and severely criticising the security forces and the Algerian authorities the day before our departure. Nevertheless, the working group of the Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the AMU was well received and held long, frank and friendly talks with the Algerian authorities: the Prime Minister, the Foreign, Finance, Religious Affairs and Justice Ministers, the President of the National People’s Assembly, all the parliamentary groups, and representatives of human rights organisations, victims of terrorism, relatives of missing persons, women, editors and journalists of the country’s leading newspapers and religious authorities. 2. The main issues raised 2.1. The events in Kabylia Discussion of the tragic events in Kabylia obviously dominated almost all the meetings we had in Algiers. It was not only a terrible incident, but – as demonstrated by the most recent events – a major crisis in a country which has been suffering serious problems for a number of years. On the one hand the very seriousness of the events is the explanation. In the towns in Kabylia dozens of demonstrators, the vast majority of them young people and adolescents, had been shot dead by the gendarmerie in the previous weeks. Hundreds of people were injured. Understandably this caused enormous distress in Algiers. The visit by the Delegation’s working group was held in the very week that the EP adopted an urgent resolution severely condemning the crushing of the demonstrations and the dozens of subsequent deaths, which it called ‘murders’. This led to angry protests by exponents of the government majority and the government itself. Once again there was talk of ‘interference’. Furthermore, the reference to the ‘Berber people’ in the EP’s resolution prompted criticism from CR\446407EN.doc EN PE 399.441 EN most of our interlocutors, both those in government and those in opposition – with few exceptions. All of them emphatically asserted their belief in the unity of the Algerian people and nation. The predominant interpretation of the events in Kabylia was that the underlying cause was not specific to the region. The catalyst was the death of a student, Massinissa Guermah, whilst in custody in a police station, but the root cause of the protest was to be found in social malaise, the problems of poverty, unemployment, shortage of housing, etc, as well as - according to some of those we spoke to - the frustration as regards language and identity felt by the amazigh-speaking Algerians, who are in a majority in the Kabylia region. Discussion of the basic causes was very important in the view of our interlocutors, who felt that if it was not a question of identity but socio-economic situations prevailing throughout the country (not just in a specific region or among a specific population) the protest was likely to extend to the whole country. Hence there was a degree of contradiction among some of our Algerian partners, who on the one hand denied the specific nature of the protest, but on the other had to acknowledge it in order to deny that the protest might spread. In response to the criticisms expressed in the EP’s urgent resolution on the events in Kabylia, the chairman of the delegation said that his task was not to criticise or interpret the EP’s resolutions, but he was convinced that the vast majority of his colleagues did not doubt the unity of the Algerian nation. Two committees of inquiry had been set up to investigate the events in Kabylia, one at the initiative of the President of the Republic, the other by the National Assembly. President Bouteflika had appointed an eminent legal expert, Professor Assad, as the chairman of the first committee. After the interview during which the President assigned him this task, Professor Assad said that he had ‘absolute carte blanche’ in carrying out his mission. In our talks with him, Professor Assad emphatically confirmed this – he was totally free to appoint the members of the committee and to carry out his work. He had invited the six editors of the main independent newspapers to be members of the committee of inquiry and three of them had accepted. He had also included legal experts and members of various professions, as well as a number of young university lecturers from Kabylia, whom he referred to as his ‘men on the spot’. Professor Assad made a good impression on the delegation members. He estimated the number of deaths at ‘between 60 and 80', but at the end of our discussion stressed this figure, which was somewhat higher than that admitted by the authorities. He described his task in highly political terms; he did not want a low-profile investigation of the kind carried out by ‘a small-town lawyer or a district judge’, but rather wished to ascertain the truth of the matter and the causes. In a country where ‘interference’ and ‘conspiracies’ are common, Professor Assad felt that the crucial question was to what extent the bloody events in Kabylia were a spontaneous reaction and the response the result of security forces being overwhelmed by events, or whether the events had been ‘orchestrated’ by somebody… PE 399.441 EN 2/11 CR\446407EN.doc The representatives of the National Assembly and civil society we talked to were divided in their opinions when asked to predict the outcome of the committees of inquiry. On the one hand, especially among representatives of civil society, there was a great deal of scepticism, in view of the poor results obtained by previous committees, especially the one appointed to investigate the murder of Budiaf. On the other hand, those who supported the President and the government defended their determination to find out the truth and referred to the massive response to the initial visits and contacts in Kabylia on the part of members of the parliamentary committee. The parliamentary representatives of the FFS (Social Forces Front) said that an international committee of inquiry needed to be set up. 2.2. The situation as regards security and ‘civil accord’ Members of the government we spoke to felt that there was a marked improvement in security, especially in the cities, although they acknowledged that there was still terrorism in rural areas. The delegation was able to confirm this positive trend during its stay in Algiers. According to the Minister for Religious Affairs ‘two or three more years of terrorist action’ were foreseeable. The Algerian authorities stressed their request for European support and solidarity, since, in their view, the terrorist networks were still receiving guidance and logistic support from people in Europe. In response to questions from a delegation member regarding the current situation of the FIS, members of the government said they were convinced that it had ‘almost died out’. After being elected in April 1999 President Bouteflika started to develop what had been one of the main points of his campaign – the policy of ‘civil accord’. Presented as a set of measures (basically a restricted amnesty) to achieve peace and reconciliation in the country, the policy allowed a number of radical fundamentalists involved in the activities of terrorist groups to be reintegrated into normal life. This policy did not manage to put an end to terrorist activity, but reduced it. Various groups did not accept the authorities’ proposals. There were also reactions from relatives of victims of terrorism and other people affected. Our delegation perceived a fairly widespread feeling of malaise regarding this issue, which emerged in response to signs that President Bouteflika might extend this political orientation in future towards a ‘national accord’ which would broaden the spectrum of dialogue for peace. Many of those we spoke to expressed profound opposition to the ‘impunity’ of terrorists and commented on the problems of local tension caused by the return of the fundamentalists allowed by government measures and their day-to-day coexistence with the victims of terrorism or their families. However, we were deeply moved by the fact that the associations of families of missing persons (including the wife of an FIS MP who had disappeared 10 years ago) and the association of victims of terrorism (including the widow of a lawyer murdered by the fundamentalists) attended one of our meetings and it perhaps signified the beginning of reconciliation in Algerian society after so many years of civil war. 2.3. Reform of the Penal Code and press freedom CR\446407EN.doc 3/11 PE 399.441 EN During our stay in Algiers, the reform of the Penal Code and the freedom of the press, which had just been debated in the national Assembly, was the subject of keen debate. The Algerian authorities, in particular the Minister of Justice, Mr Ahmed OUYAHIA, emphatically maintained that the Algerian press was among the freest in the world and that the aim of the planned reforms was to protect individuals and institutions from possible defamation and other abuse. The Minister justified the amendments to the Penal Code, pointing out that they had been adopted by a large majority and, in fact, reproduced elements of French law. On the other hand, during a meeting with journalists and private newspaper editors (representatives of the State press had been invited, but declined to take part), our interlocutors criticised the changes, interpreting them as a severe threat to the very survival of the media, complained that they were subject to pressure and that the revision of the Penal Code, in particular the three articles concerning the potential offences of defamation, libel and slander against the State, could, if applied arbitrarily, destroy the free and independent press. They said that in the context of division and weakness in businesses, economic sanctions could lead to the closure of newspapers. During the days following this meeting various demonstrations were held by journalists from the independent press. The free Algerian press played a leading role during the most difficult years of the terrorist offensive and many journalists paid with their lives (60 journalists and 105 print workers). The current situation must also be seen from this point of view. 2.4. Human rights According to official figures, there are 4 607 missing persons. We were told that many families had received explanations from the authorities denying any responsibility on the part of the police, the army or other government authority. The number of people who had disappeared during the previous decade of violence could be anything between 4 000 and 8 000 and the representatives of the families of missing persons were convinced that the security forces and the army were implicated. The government representatives pointed out the contradiction between the European concern about human rights and the reluctance to take decisive action against fundamentalist terrorism. In the most difficult years of this struggle, they said, Europe left them to their own devices and waited a long time to take any action against the terrorist cells operating in various European countries. The representatives of the Socialist Forces Front (FFS) said that it was unacceptable for the international community to offer the regime support and called for an international committee of inquiry into the recent events in Kabylia to be set up. 2.5. The economic and social situation We have already mentioned the extremely difficult social situation, which basically explains the outbreak of violence in Kabylia. It started just before a special plan for economic revival was announced for the period 2001-2004, intended to enable the country to achieve a growth rate of 6 – 7%, reduce the debt by around $ 22 billion and the debt servicing to about 20% of export PE 399.441 EN 4/11 CR\446407EN.doc revenue. This plan, accompanied by a reform of the education and justice systems, is one of the government’s priorities. The possible effect of its introduction was called into question by the outbreak of protest. The government is trying to ensure that macroeconomic equilibrium is maintained and to support growth by reforming public undertakings and liberalising the economy. Its ability to carry out these reforms will be the crucial issue. Without it, the problem of unemployment will continue to grow irreversibly (it is already dramatic, in a country where the vast majority of the population is young). 3. The prospects for the AMU and Western Sahara The representatives of the Algerian government showed great interest in the revival of Maghreb unity through the institutions of the Arab Maghreb Union (AMU). A meeting of Foreign Ministers of the AMU had been held recently and they agreed to reactivate the various committees and structures of the AMU. The dispute over Western Sahara was discussed at the meeting, which the Moroccan Minister did not attend, although he indicated, in an interview, that this issue could not be side-stepped. The Algerian authorities reaffirmed their support for the self-determination of the Saharawi people and the questions concerning their opinion on the ‘third way’ demonstrated their rejection. Nevertheless they insisted that the two sides directly involved in the conflict must talk and negotiate directly. They reiterated on several occasions their desire for direct dialogue between the Moroccan authorities and the Polisario Front. At a certain point the Foreign Minister stated that any agreement must also meet with his country’s approval. Our impression was that without progress in the Western Sahara conflict it was very difficult to achieve substantial progress in Maghreb integration. Despite this, we were told that relations between Algeria and Morocco were being intensified and preparations were being made for a summit between President Bouteflika and the King of Morocco, Mohamed VI. 4. Relations with the EU and the Association Agreement Despite criticisms by members of the government and the opposition about certain aspects of the development of the Barcelona Process (especially with regard to the amount of MEDA II funding and the cumbersome nature of the MEDA programme procedures), all those we spoke to (including the representatives of Islamic parties) felt that it was an essential framework which should be not only maintained but also strengthened. Negotiations for the Association Agreement between Algeria and the Union were making reasonable progress and we were told that the Algerian side expected to conclude the negotiations before the end of 2001. They felt that progress needed to be made in the dismantling of tariffs and the granting of visas. More generally, they complained that it was difficult for their partners to take all Algeria’s specific needs on board. They reaffirmed that the EU should guarantee people freedom of movement. 5. Conclusions CR\446407EN.doc 5/11 PE 399.441 EN 5.1. It was clearly necessary to intensify relations between the EP and Algeria as part of the context of solidarity. In the Algerian view (including all the sectors and different points of view we heard) Europe (and the European Parliament in particular) is too hasty in judging and too slow in providing support and aid. 5.2. The process of economic reforms was slow and contradictory. Despite having talked to highly qualified people with sound democratic convictions, known to be patriotic, we could not help gaining the impression that the atmosphere in the country, the distortions and traumas of the last decade and an incomplete agenda for democratisation had hampered the process of transition to a more modern and transparent economy. In a country rich in resources, these problems generate dual tension. In addition to unemployment and material difficulties, there is also the feeling that the government is unable to introduce the reforms vital for ensuring a ‘virtuous circle’ of economic growth, efficiency, transparency and administrative modernisation. The association with the EU should develop in a .…….. framework. 5.3. It is very difficult to forecast how the political situation in Algeria will develop. Many of our Algerian partners said that there were all the ingredients for a large-scale explosive social and political situation in the country, because of the desire for social changes and freedom. After our visit there was increased mobilisation, with a major demonstration in Algiers, which created serious problems for the authorities. However, political fragmentation, divisions in society and an atmosphere of general distrust (the Minister for Justice and Secretary-General of the RND told us that ‘in Algeria a breakdown in trust is at the root of all crises’) make it impossible to identify any clear trends for the future. In addition to this uncertainty, there is the prospect of elections, due to be held within 9 to 12 months. 5.4. The majority of those we talked to, although they dealt with a wide range of different topics, agreed on the need for change in the future, in order to meet the demands of the population, achieve greater national consensus and full democratic legitimacy, carry out essential economic and social reforms and bring about peace. Annex Meetings with members of the National Assembly and members of the Algerian government The National Assembly’s delegations for relations with European The chairman of the committee for external relations, Mr Abdelhamid SI AFIF The chairman of the committee for economic affairs Chairmen and vice-chairmen of all the parliamentary groups The Vice-President of the National Assembly, Mr Abderrezak MEBARKI The President of the National Assembly, Mr Abdelkader BENSALAH The chairman and members of the parliamentary committee of inquiry into the events in Kabylia The chairman of the committee of inquiry, Mr ASSAD The Prime Minister, Mr Ali BENFLIS The Minister of Finance, Mr Abdelatif BENACHENOU The Minister for Religious Affairs, Mr Bouabdellah GHOLAMALLAH The Minister for Justice, Mr Ahmed OUYAHIA The Foreign Minister, Mr Abdelaziz BELKHADEM PE 399.441 EN 6/11 CR\446407EN.doc The National Observatory for Human Rights: Mr Rezag BARA, Chairman and Mr BOUCETTA, Secretary-General Meetings with representatives of civil society Belkhenchir Foundation, Mrs Fadela BELKHENCHIR Mrs Fathma N’SOUMEUR and Mrs Ourida CHOUAKI SOS Femmes en Détresse, Dr BENHABIB Rassemblement algérien des femmes démocrates, Mrs. Zazi SADOU and Mrs Kheira DEKALI Comité national contre l'oubli et la trahison, Mr Khelthoum ZINOU Collectif Maghreb Egalité, Mrs Nadia Aït ZAÏ Paix et Développement, Mrs Lila OUBOUSA and Mrs Yasmina CHOUAKI Ligue algérienne de la défense des droits de l'homme (LADDH) chairman, Sr. Ali YAHIA and vice-chairman Mr HOCINE Ligue algérienne des droits de l'homme (LADH) Mr Ghechir BOUDJAMAA Comité de coordinatión pour la verité et la justice Mr Djemil BENRABAH Association des familles des disparus, Mrs Eighil LILS Archbishop of Algiers, Mons. Henri TESSIER Caritas Algérie, Mons. Denis GONZALES CR\446407EN.doc 7/11 PE 399.441 EN PARLEMENT EUROPEEN DELEGATION POUR LES RELATIONS AVEC LES PAYS DU MAGHREB ET L'UNION DU MAGHREB ARABE 5ème rencontre interparlementaire Alger 18-22 mai 2001 PROJET DE PROGRAMME Vendredi 18 mai Arrivée des membres de la délégation Accueil par M. Abdelhamid SI AFIF, Président de la Commission des Affaires Etrangères, de la coopération et de l'Emigration de l'APN Installation à l'hôtel "El Djazair" Dîner de travail et briefing organisé par l'Ambassadeur de Suède Samedi 19 mai 09h00-12 h 00 12h30 14h15-14h45 14h50-15h20 15h20-15h55 16h15-17h15 17h15-17h45 17h50-18h20 18h25-18h55 19h00-19h30 Entretiens entre une délégation de l'APN et la délégation parlementaire européenne conduite par M. Raimon Obiols y Germa, Président de la Délégation pour les relations avec les pays du Maghreb et l'UMA au Parlement européen Déjeuner à l'APN Rencontre avec le Groupes parlementaire des Indépendants Rencontre avec le Groupes parlementaire du Rassemblement pour la Culture et la Démocratie (RCD) Rencontre avec le Groupes parlementaire du Front des Forces Socialistes (FFS) Audience de M. Ali BENFLIS, Chef du Gouvernement Rencontre avec le Groupes parlementaire du Mouvement Ennahda (MN) Rencontre avec le Groupes parlementaire du parti du Front de Liberation nationale (FLN) Rencontre avec le Groupes parlementaire´du Mouvement de la Société pour la Paix (MSP) Rencontre avec le Groupes parlementaire du Rassemblement National Démocratique (RND) Dimanche 20 mai 09 h 00 10 h 00 PE 399.441 EN Rencontre au Conseil de la Nation Rencontre avec M Bouabdellah GHOLAMALLAH, Ministre des 8/11 CR\446407EN.doc 11 h 30 13 h 30 15 h 00 17h30 20 h 00 Affaires Religieuses et Habous Rencontre avec les membres de la commission d’enquête - Kabilie Déjeuner de presse offert par M. Obiols, Président de la Délégation du Parlement Européen Rencontre avec M. Ahmed OUYAHIA, Ministre d'Etat, Ministre de la Justice Rencontre avec M. Abdelaziz BELKHADEM, Ministre d'Etat, Ministre des Affaires Etrangères Dîner offert par M. Abderrezak MEBARKI, Vice-Président de l'Assemblée Populaire Nationale Lundi 21 mai 09h00 Rencontre avec M Abdelatif BENACHENOU, Ministre des Finances 10h00 - Fondation Belkhenchir - Fathma N'Soumeur, Mme Ourida CHOUAKI - SOS Femmes en détresse, Dr. BENHABIB - Rassemblement algérien des Femmes démocrates, Mme Zazi SADOU et Mme Kheira DEKALI - Mme Aït ZAÏ, avocate 11h00 Ligue algérienne de la Défense des Droits de l'Homme (LADDH), Président : M. Ali YAHIA, Vice-Président : M. HOCINE, Ligue algérienne des Droits de l'Homme (LADH), M. Ghechir BOUDJAMAA. 12h00 Comité de Coordination pour la Vérité et la Justice, M. Djemil BENRABAH Association des Familles de disparus, Mme Eighil LILA 15h00 Audience de M Abdelkader BENSALAH, Président de l'APN 17h00 Archévèque, Mgr. Henri TESSIER Caritas Algérie, Mgr. Denis GONZALES 18h00 Observatoire national des Droits de l'Homme, M. Rezag BARA Président, M. BOUCETTA, secrétaire général 20h00 Dîner offert par M. Abdelkader BENSALAH, Président de l'APN Mardi 22 mai Départ de la délégation parlementaire PARLEMENT EUROPEEN CR\446407EN.doc 9/11 PE 399.441 EN DELEGATION POUR LES RELATIONS AVEC LES PAYS DU MAGHREB ET L'UNION DU MAGHREB ARABE 5ième rencontre Parlement Européen/Algérie, Algiers 18-22 mai 2001 Listes des Participants Députés Groupe Pays Commissions Mr Raimon OBIOLS I GERMA, Président PSE Espagne des affaires étrangères, des droits de l’homme, de la sécurité commune et de la politique de défense Mr Jorge Salvador HERNANDEZ MOLLAR, PPE Espagne des libertés et des droits des citoyens, de la justice et des affaires intérieures Verts/ALE France de l’emploi et des affaires sociales Mme Yasmine BOUDJENAH GUE France de développement et de la coopération M Hugues MARTIN PPE France des affaires étrangères, des droits de l’homme, de la sécurité commune et de la politique de défense de la pêche commission temporaire sur le système d'interception Echelon Mme Pasqualina NAPOLETANO PSE Italy des affaires étrangères, des droits de l’homme, de la sécurité commune et de la politique de défense 1er Vice-Président Mrs Hélène FLAUTRE, 2ème Vice-Président Abréviations PPE: Groupe du Parti Populaire Européen (Démocrates-Chrétiens) et Démocrates Européens PSE: Groupe du Parti des Socialistes européens ELDR: Groupe du parti européen des libéraux, démocrates et réformateurs Verts/ALE: Groupe des Verts/Alliance Libre européenne GUE/NGL: Groupe confédéral de la Gauche unitaire européenne/Gauche verte nordique ./. PE 399.441 EN 10/11 CR\446407EN.doc Secrétariat des Délégations interparlementaires Mr Christian CHOPIN, Administrateur principal Ms Morag DONALDSON, Assistante administrative Interprétation Ms Agnès BERNARD Ms Erro LACALLE M. Enrique QUIJANO Agents des Groupes Politiques Ms Teresa MOLERES, Conseiller groupe PSE M. Claude TALEB, Conseiller groupe VERTS CR\446407EN.doc 11/11 PE 399.441 EN