rcap-433
Transcription
rcap-433
268 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 3 Ottawa, Ontario --- Upon resuming at 8:40 a.m. on Wednesday, April 6, 1994 4 CHAIRPERSON JIM BOURQUE, Royal 5 Commission on Aboriginal Peoples: 6 open today's session. 7 Good morning. We will I would like to, at this time, call on 8 Elder Paul Vincent to lead us in opening prayer. 9 --- (Opening Prayer by Elder Paul Vincent) 10 CHAIRPERSON JIM BOURQUE: Before we 11 outline the orders of the day, I would like to ask everyone 12 to try to stick to the topic at hand because they are very 13 important issues we are talking about. 14 our regular business on time or a little ahead of schedule, 15 then I would like to have half an hour or so to open the 16 floor to general questions that maybe we missed yesterday 17 or we will miss today. 18 would be good. 19 the questions or make your questions brief and limit your 20 discussions to the issue. 21 If we can finish So, if we can arrange that, that So, we should be to the point and answer This morning we are going to deal with 22 issue number IV, Métis self-government. 23 will moderate that part of it. Mr. Donavon Young At 10:45 to 12:00 o'clock StenoTran 269 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 the issue will be Métis women and community decision-making 2 and Ms Karen Collins will moderate that section of our 3 agenda. 4 15:45 again we will have Karen Collins moderating and the 5 issue is implementation and solutions. 6 official agenda. We have lunch from 12:00 to 1:30. 7 From 1:30 to That is our We will have a break at 15:45 to 16:00 8 and our rapporteur, Marty Dunn, will report on the 9 Conference. At 16:30 to 16:45 there will be closing 10 comments and closing prayer. 11 place in there a bit of time to have a period for general 12 questions, I think that would round out the day pretty 13 well. 14 15 So, if we can squeeze some Without any further adieu, I am going to ask Mr. Donavon Young to take the chair. 16 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG, Urban 17 Perspectives, Research, Royal Commission on Aboriginal 18 Peoples: 19 will find the questions for Métis self-government under 20 Tab 6, if you wanted to turn there now. Thanks, Jim, and good morning, everyone. You 21 As Jim said, from 9:00 this morning until 22 about 10:30 -- so, for the next hour and a half -- we will 23 talk about issues around Métis self-government and service StenoTran 270 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 delivery. 2 your views and your comments around self-government and 3 service delivery. 4 The Commissioners are interested in hearing I would like to, as much as possible, 5 go through some of these questions. 6 with Question Number 1 and I have added a number of 7 ancillary or secondary questions: 8 have for self-government? 9 process towards self-government? 10 Perhaps we can begin What visions do Métis Do you envision a transitional Would it be community-based or regional 11 in scope? 12 Métis National Council, in its brief to the Commission, 13 spoke of a national form of self-government. 14 NCC envision a similar type? 15 Perhaps it might be national in scope. The Does the What would be the main structural 16 elements of Métis self-government? In other words, what 17 would it look like? 18 it be primarily service delivery, would it also have 19 law-making capacity and policy-making capacity or to 20 concentrate primarily on the provision of services? What would be its main parts? Would 21 Urban self-government is something that 22 I am interested in and the entire Commission is, certainly. 23 What are your visions for urban self-government? StenoTran What 271 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 will self-government in the cities look like? 2 something that we can work towards? 3 self-government in the cities concentrate primarily on 4 the provision of services or would it also include such 5 things as law-making? 6 Is that Again would What preparations are necessary towards 7 the implementation of Métis self-government? 8 requirements must be in 9 financial requirements or preparations are necessary and place? What legal What political and 10 what administrative and human resources or training 11 requirements are necessary to make self-government a 12 reality? 13 Question Number 3: 14 implementation of self-government and the delivery of 15 services proceed; on a "Métis only" basis or on a "status 16 blind" or pan-Aboriginal basis or are there other options? 17 18 Is there some common ground? How should the Is it necessarily those two extremes? 19 We have heard testimony certainly in the 20 Prairie provinces where the testimony is quite strong that 21 services ought to be on a "Métis-only" basis. 22 heard that in some of the eastern and Maritime provinces, 23 where a pan-Aboriginal approach seems to be more suitable, StenoTran We haven't 272 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 but we would like to talk about that, the provision of 2 services and who would qualify. 3 What are the priority areas for transfer 4 of authority from perhaps federal and certain provincial 5 governments to Métis governments? 6 areas; education, health, social services? 7 what are the real priorities? 8 What are the priority What are they, A question that you don't see here, but 9 I think would be useful to talk about -- certainly the 10 Aboriginal Peoples Council of New Brunswick in its brief 11 to the Commission spoke about political reforms to Canadian 12 institutions. 13 but is there a role for political reforms to Canadian 14 institutions, such as guaranteed representation in the 15 House of Commons or in the Senate, on City Council, on 16 school boards. 17 thing and, if so, is it a priority? 18 We don't really call that self-government, So, political reforms; is that a useful So, those are some of the questions we 19 have. 20 I don't know a lot of your names. 21 me, I am going to do a bit of pointing here and there. 22 I know a few of you, but I don't know as many as I should. 23 We will begin with a round table. Unfortunately, You will have to excuse So, without further delay, why don't we begin. StenoTran 273 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 I would like to, as much as possible, 2 begin with Question Number 1 and work our way down the 3 list, if you will permit. 4 Number 1 and see if we can just go through the list and 5 begin talking generally about visions for Métis 6 self-government at a national, regional, community level, 7 what would it look like, what would be its functions, what 8 would be its roles. 9 10 So, why don't we start with So, let's talk about visions, to begin with, perhaps. I will open the floor. 11 Claude? 12 CLAUDE AUBIN, Métis Individual, 13 Province of Quebec: It's quite a lengthy discussion we 14 could have there, but would it be possible -- the Métis 15 of Quebec did a presentation in front of the Commission 16 last year expressing many of those issues. 17 possible, for the record, that what we presented at the 18 time be included in this circle in the sense of the document 19 we presented? Would it be 20 Maybe to facilitate that, we did bring 21 a document which is part of this thing, if it could just 22 be included. 23 that you were talking about this morning. Of course, we will be discussing those things StenoTran It is like we 274 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 are again tabling this document. 2 3 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: Okay, sure. We will do that, Claude. 4 CLAUDE AUBIN: What I will say is that 5 it's the document that we brought here and that we gave 6 to everybody. 7 - La Conféderation des Métis". 8 full document be part of this assessment that you will 9 be making. It's called "La Nation métisse au Québec We would like that the 10 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 11 Who would like to begin? Thank you. Who would like 12 to talk about their ideas, their visions for Métis 13 self-government? 14 Claude? 15 CLAUDE AUBIN: À la lueur des 16 circonstances qui entourent les Métis dans la province 17 de Québec, il y a une chose aussi qu'il ne faudrait pas 18 oublier: 19 gouvernementale, on ne peut pas seulement parler en 20 fonction de la réalité canadienne; il y a une autre réalité 21 qui est présente et à laquelle nous devons faire face 22 constamment, et c'est la prise de position de la 23 souveraineté des Québécois. Nous, quand on parle d'autonomie Je ne sais pas jusqu'à quel StenoTran 275 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 point on peut dissocier notre concertation vis-à-vis la 2 situation de notre désir d'autonomie gouvernementale, mais 3 nous, nous devons jusqu'à un certain point, étant donné 4 que nous devons faire face à ça, patauger quasiment dans 5 deux situations, deux dossiers différents quand on parle 6 d'autonomie gouvernementale. 7 Naturellement, nous nous considérons 8 comme des individus sous une emprise fédérale. Par 9 contre, suite aux négociations fédérales-provinciales, 10 nous nous posons des questions sérieuses advenant des 11 transferts de pouvoir fédéral-provincial vis-à-vis les 12 autochtones. 13 C'est juste quelque chose que 14 j'aimerais, à la lueur des discussions qu'on amène aussi 15 sur la table, que vous preniez en considération ou 16 peut-être nous éclairer jusqu'à un certain point, comment 17 est-ce qu'on pourrait parler de façon plus claire vis-à-vis 18 ça. 19 de nation à nation. 20 comme une nation, nous considérons le Canada comme une 21 nation. 22 Commission soit consciente. 23 Notre position est claire: Nous voulons négocier Nous ne considérons pas le Québec Donc c'est quelque chose dont j'aimerais que la GARTH WALLBRIDGE, Métis Policy Team, StenoTran 276 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples: 2 a question for you and it's so hypothetical, you may not 3 be in any position to answer it. 4 Claude, I have With the ideas in Quebec for the last 5 several decades, but of current interest in terms of 6 separation, how is your organization, if at all, dealing 7 with the Quebec government on these same kinds of issues 8 you are just speaking of? 9 now in deciding what the future of your organization might 10 be if this very big question in terms of separation ever 11 moves much farther along the spectrum? 12 Is that a part of your plan CLAUDE AUBIN: Yes, it is because, 13 premièrement, la réalité est qu'au Québec, le gouvernement 14 du Québec ne reconnaît que 11 nations sur son territoire 15 et ne reconnaît pas la nation métisse comme telle. 16 gouvernement du Québec et les Premières Nations peuvent, 17 par processus, faire des ententes entre eux, et nous, on 18 se pose toujours la question: 19 une situation d'indépendance au Québec? 20 la question. 21 négociations? 22 questions-là ont été posées déjà au Québec et n'ont pas 23 été répondues. Le Qu'adviendra-t-il advenant On se la pose, Est-ce que nous serons inclus dans les Les questions n'ont pas été répondues; ces StenoTran 277 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Tout dernièrement on a eu une rencontre 2 avec le NCC, c'est-à-dire le Congrès des peuples 3 aborigènes, et un représentant du Québec était là à ce 4 moment-là. 5 bien dit, très clairement, que le gouvernement du Québec 6 et les Premières Nations ont demandé qu'elles seules soient 7 les nations qui transigent avec le Québec pour des 8 discussions gouvernementales sur ce sujet-là. 9 une de nos préoccupations; elle est soulevée dans notre 10 La question a été soulevée, sauf qu'il a été Donc c'est document. 11 Suite à la prise de position 12 nationaliste non seulement du Québec mais aussi des 13 Premières Nations sur le territoire du Québec, qui est 14 très forte, on se pose des questions sérieuses, à savoir, 15 si on ne s'organise pas en entité nationale, au Québec, 16 les Métis, que nous arrivera-t-il au lendemain de la 17 souveraineté, d'une question de souveraineté avec le 18 Québec? Donc c'est une grosse préoccupation pour nous. 19 Nous ne savons pas jusqu'à quel point 20 le gouvernement du Québec est prêt à... parce que nous, 21 pour les Métis du Québec, la nation métisse au Québec, 22 ce n'est pas rien qu'une question de services. 23 parle d'autonomie gouvernementale, on parle de structures StenoTran Quand on 278 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 gouvernementales, on parle de prise en charge, on parle 2 d'un paquet de choses. 3 à un organisme de services; nous voulons entrer dans 4 l'équité, dans l'égalité des Premières Nations sur le 5 territoire du Québec, dans toutes négociations possibles 6 qui se feront en tripartite ou en bipartite. Donc on ne veut pas être limité 7 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 8 GARTH WALLBRIDGE: 9 That's good, thanks, Claude. 10 CLAUDE AUBIN: Garth? No, that's fine. Juste pour rajouter, 11 nous ne voulons pas entrer en discussion d'autonomie 12 gouvernementale en bipartite avec le Québec. 13 définitif. 14 fédéral, et nous ne voulons pas aussi être de juridiction 15 provinciale. 16 17 Ça, c'est Nous voulons le faire dans un contexte MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: Okay, thank you, Claude. 18 Commissioner Chartrand? 19 COMMISSIONER PAUL CHARTRAND: Mr. 20 Aubin, I wonder if you would care to comment a bit further 21 on the issue that you have raised. 22 anticipate what sort of recommendations this Commission 23 might make respecting your constituents and its StenoTran I am trying to 279 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 aspirations in the province of Quebec. 2 I understand there are six more million 3 people in Quebec. 4 organization? 5 so that they listen to your claims? 6 you make to them? 7 which, presumably, might be a way of moving government 8 to listen to your claims? 9 sort of mechanisms, what sort of strong arguments? 10 How many members are there in your How do you plan to move Quebec governments What arguments will Do you have legal claims to the land What sort of claims or what Would it be possible for you to 11 highlight/summarize them here for us so that we could have 12 an understanding of what it is that we could recommend, 13 so that the government would be moved to see that there 14 is good reason to respond positively to the claims that 15 you might refer to the government of Quebec? 16 CLAUDE AUBIN: Premièrement, je dois 17 clarifier quelque chose, et c'est que la nation métisse 18 au Québec ou les Métis au Québec pour l'instant ont toujours 19 existé, ont toujours été là. 20 historique qu'ont vécue les Métis au Québec depuis 1970, 21 depuis la création de l'Alliance laurentienne des Métis 22 et Indiens sans statut à l'époque, les Métis au Québec 23 ont toujours eu de la difficulté au sein de certaines Mais, suite à une situation StenoTran 280 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 organisations à se développer dans un contexte spécifique 2 de leur identité culturelle. 3 L'aboutissement de cette situation a 4 forcé ce qu'on appelle au Québec les Métis nationalistes... 5 parce que, il faut que je sois honnête avec vous, au Québec 6 il y a les Métis nationalistes et il y a les Métis qui, 7 parce qu'ils n'ont pas reçu un niveau d'éducation politique 8 ou de prise en charge, de possibilité de voir qu'ils peuvent 9 se prendre en charge politiquement, de ce qu'ils sont et 10 de ce qu'ils peuvent devenir, de ce qu'ils peuvent faire... 11 le développement de la nation métisse au Québec est un 12 développement d'une entité dans un contexte national égale 13 à toutes les autres nations sur le territoire du Québec 14 et est un processus qui ne date que d'un an. 15 Malheureusement pour nous -- je ne sais 16 pas si c'est nécessairement malheureusement, mais 17 heureusement d'une certaine façon aussi -- nous n'avons 18 aucun financement de personne. 19 la nation métisse au Québec présentement est fait de façon 20 bénévole. 21 que j'ai pour l'Alliance autochtone du Québec, qui existe 22 déjà depuis 20 ans, que nous n'avons aucune aide. 23 contraire, même, si vous lisez les articles de journaux, Tout le développement de Je peux même vous dire, avec tout le respect StenoTran Au 281 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 c'est publié dans les journaux présentement, certains 2 journaux dans le comté de Pontiac, où des présidents de 3 régions disent qu'ils ne peuvent pas aider au financement 4 de la nation métisse au Québec parce que l'Alliance 5 autochtone du Québec rencontre des difficultés financières 6 énormes. 7 Naturellement, on se pose des questions 8 sérieuses, à savoir, quel est donc le mandat de ces 9 organismes, de ces associations-là, pour les gens qui ont 10 choisi de façon claire, à travers leur identité, de se 11 développer dans une entité nationale. 12 réalité avec laquelle on vit. 13 Ça, c'est la Maintenant, depuis qu'on a réussi à 14 décortiquer et à être capable de rencontrer dans des 15 communautés des Métis, avec un agenda métis, pour une 16 discussion métisse, on a réussi depuis un an à informer 17 la population. 18 d'information de ça. 19 façon plus concertée et de façon plus... comment est-ce 20 que je pourrais dire? 21 c'est beau, on le fait, mais le Québec est grand. 22 23 On est encore dans le processus Et nous savons que si on peut, de Le bénévolat, Monsieur Chartrand, Nous allons chercher tranquillement des Métis nationalistes convaincus qui sont en train de se StenoTran 282 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 joindre tranquillement au processus du développement de 2 la nation métisse au Québec. 3 un code de citoyenneté. 4 un processus. 5 dans les communautés, dans plusieurs communautés au 6 Québec, des représentants de la promotion de la nation 7 métisse. Nous sommes en train d'établir Nous sommes en train d'identifier des gens Nous sommes très prudents. 8 9 Aussi, nous avons établi Nous sommes prêts présentement à négocier avec le fédéral pour un processus d'énumération, 10 un processus de consultation sur l'autonomie 11 gouvernementale métisse -- et non pas un processus de 12 consultation cintré avec les Indiens hors réserve ou les 13 Indiens sans statut -- pour qu'on puisse parler de nous, 14 pour qu'on puisse élaborer un projet d'une nation dans 15 toute sa totalité. 16 vous: 17 antérieurement d'aller de l'avant dans un contexte 18 nationaliste. 19 Donc il faut que je sois honnête avec Nous n'avons jamais eu l'opportunité Ça, c'est une clarification que je me 20 devais de dire à la Commission. Ceux qui ont vu les dix 21 personnes, les cinq femmes et cinq hommes qui se sont 22 présentés à Montréal l'an passé, déjà la semence de voir 23 ces dix personnes là se prendre en charge, aller devant StenoTran 283 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 la Commission et dire "Écoutez, Messieurs les 2 Commissaires, écoutez, Canada, écoutez, Québec, nous 3 sommes Métis, nous existons"... l'adrénaline était là. 4 C'était toute une décision pour ces gens-là de dire: 5 Enfin, je m'en vais et je me dis que je suis Métis, je 6 ne suis plus embarqué dans un bateau où on me dit "T'es 7 ci" et où on me dit "T'es ça"; c'est une décision qui a 8 été prise en fonction de ça. 9 10 Les revendications et les arguments. Premièrement, on pourrait dire que les 11 arguments, c'est qu'on voudrait que vous reconnaissiez 12 que, de fait, au Québec, il y a des Métis qui désirent 13 s'organiser dans une entité nationale avec une vision que 14 dans chacune des provinces... dans plusieurs communautés 15 à la grandeur du Québec il y a des Métis nationalistes 16 qui ont une vision d'une grande confédération métisse ou 17 d'une grande nation métisse d'un bout à l'autre du pays 18 dans le respect de la diversité de cette nation-là. 19 Comme vous le savez, Monsieur Chartrand, 20 il y en a qui se rattachent dans un méchif (PH) et parlent 21 français ojibway, français cri, anglais cri, nous avons 22 les Montagnais, et caetera, et caetera, et caetera. 23 il y a une grande diversité qui doit être respectée. StenoTran Donc 284 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Dans le contexte de cette 2 reconnaissance-là, il y a aussi ce dont on a parlé un peu 3 hier quand on a parlé de traités, quand on a parlé du lien 4 que plusieurs d'entre nous ont à certains traités, du lien 5 aux droits aboriginaux, les droits qui nous 6 permettraient... parce qu'on ne veut plus voir petit, on 7 ne veut plus être assis sur le siège d'en arrière à espérer 8 que peut-être les Premières Nations vont dire un jour: 9 Oui, nous allons vous inviter autour de la table de 10 négociation. 11 Nous voulons aller de l'avant et dire 12 que dans une refonte, si vous voulez, des revendications 13 territoriales sur la map du Québec, parce que nous sommes 14 de ce territoire-là, de cette région-là, nous avons droit 15 à une place pour des terres communautaires ou en partage 16 avec d'autres communautés, dépendamment de ce à quoi les 17 discussions aboutiront. 18 remarquer que, par circonstances, toute notre population 19 est des payeurs d'impôts et aussi des détenteurs de 20 territoires privés, qui sont les propriétés privées de 21 chacun de ces individus là, qui, semblable à la communauté 22 de Kanesatake, qui est un damier, peuvent devenir, dans 23 une revendication de base territoriale, une base peut-être Nous voulons aussi vous faire StenoTran 285 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 d'une vision contemporaine d'un avenir, comment est-ce 2 qu'on pourrait se négocier ça. 3 Aussi, il faut que vous sachiez qu'au 4 Québec, lorsque nous faisons partie de certaines 5 associations, on nous dit... on parle des Indiens hors 6 réserve, mais au Québec il y a aussi des communautés 7 métisses; il y a des Métis qui vivent dans des centres 8 urbains aussi. 9 -- ça, c'est très important -- nous avons des territoires Donc nous sommes une communauté de gens 10 distincts qui sont nos propriétés pour l'instant, nous 11 sommes prêts à négocier des territoires communautaires 12 pour l'usage exclusif de la population métisse au Québec; 13 pourquoi pas? 14 Nous, on veut pousser de l'avant dans 15 cette égalité-là tout ce qui est accessible aux Premières 16 Nations et tout ce qui est accessible aux négociations 17 qui auront lieu entre le fédéral, le provincial et le Québec 18 (sic); pourquoi pas? 19 gouvernementale touche, soit dans nos communautés ou soit 20 en milieu urbain, aussi le développement culturel, le 21 développement social, le développement politique, le 22 développement gouvernemental, qui ne sera peut-être pas 23 semblable mais peut-être avec plusieurs similitudes ou Mais notre vision d'autonomie StenoTran 286 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 similarités avec ce que les Premières Nations du Québec 2 pourront développer. 3 Mais, avec tout le respect de ce 4 processus-là, nous voulons être là, à cette table de 5 négociation, toute table de négociation qui sera 6 entreprise entre le Québec et le Canada, entre le Canada 7 et les autochtones du Québec, entre les autochtones du 8 Québec et le Québec. 9 Si on a l'opportunité d'être à une table 10 de concertation, si on a l'opportunité d'être dans un 11 cercle de discussion, ces choses-là seront préparées en 12 fonction des demandes ou des discussions qui auront lieu. 13 Donc, le highlight de ça, c'est que, dans un contexte 14 d'autonomie gouvernementale, nous espérons que les 15 Premières Nations nous inviteront et nous espérons aussi 16 que les gouvernements concernés nous inviteront. 17 Peut-être aussi pour clarifier quelque 18 chose, dans le passé, si les Métis n'étaient pas là, dans 19 cette entité-là, c'est que, comme je vous ai dit au début, 20 nous sommes englobés dans ce concept d'un peuple distinct 21 au Québec promu par l'Alliance autochtone du Québec, mais 22 un peuple sans nom, un peuple "alliancien", le peuple de 23 l'Alliance autochtone du Québec. Et, pour plusieurs StenoTran 287 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 d'entre nous, nationalistes métis, c'est très difficile. Donc si les gouvernements invitent 3 l'Alliance autochtone du Québec, malheureusement, cette 4 vision de la nation métisse sera englobée dans la 5 présentation de ces gens-là, qui -- il faut que je sois 6 honnête aussi -- ne sont pas tout à fait en accord avec 7 ce que nous faisons. 8 développement de la nation métisse au Québec est quelque 9 chose qui ne peut plus être arrêté maintenant, parce 10 11 12 13 14 15 Mais ça, c'est leur problème. Le qu'enfin nous nous sommes retrouvés dans cette vision-là. Si je continue... vous posiez des questions au sujet du développement... MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: M. Dussault wanted to ask a question, Claude, or make a comment. COPRÉSIDENT RENÉ DUSSAULT: Monsieur 16 Aubin, je ne veux pas vous interrompre, mais simplement, 17 peut-être qu'à ce moment-ci il serait utile d'avoir une 18 ou deux clarifications. 19 La première a trait à la reconnaissance 20 de la nation métisse par le gouvernement du Québec. 21 avez fait état de la résistance, effectivement, à 22 reconnaître comme douzième nation au Québec... il y a dix 23 nations autochtones et il y a les Inuit. StenoTran Vous Les Métis comme 288 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 tels... vous dites également qu'il y a de la résistance 2 de la part des Premières Nations au Québec à ce que vous 3 soyez reconnus par le gouvernement du Québec comme une 4 nation distincte et que vous puissiez avoir des relations 5 avec le gouvernement du Québec et des négociations avec 6 le gouvernement du Québec. 7 8 9 Alors j'aimerais peut-être que vous clarifiez ça. CLAUDE AUBIN: La résistance, ce n'est 10 pas une résistance -- comment est-ce que je pourrais dire 11 ça -- de front; c'est-à-dire que toute chose nouvelle, 12 toute chose qui demande des refontes, toute chose qui 13 demande de repenser, naturellement, tout changement 14 apporte une certaine résistance. 15 convaincus que cette résistance-là n'est pas une 16 résistance négative pour l'instant. 17 plutôt une remise en question de perceptions. Mais nous sommes Je pense que c'est 18 Des fois, nous, quand on est en train 19 de faire le développement et qu'on évolue avec le dossier 20 de la nation métisse, on se dit toujours que si dans cette 21 concertation des Métis ça peut aider certains Métis à mieux 22 comprendre qui ils sont et qu'ils se sentent plus rattachés 23 à leur nation autochtone d'origine et qu'ils veulent StenoTran 289 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 prendre cette route-là pour se rallier à leur nation 2 d'origine, tant mieux. 3 à s'apercevoir qu'ils se sentent mal dans ça et qu'ils 4 aiment mieux être Québécois, c'est correct avec nous. 5 Mais, du fait qu'on commence à soulever cette 6 discussion-là, la résistance des Premières Nations est 7 plutôt une espèce de prudence; ils sont très prudents 8 vis-à-vis tout ça. 9 Si ça peut aider certains gens Naturellement, ça remet en question 10 beaucoup leur citoyenneté ou leur membership, parce que 11 certaines nations parlent d'une identité à partir de la 12 Loi sur les Indiens, et nous, on parle de citoyenneté 13 métisse. 14 sur les Métis, n'a aucun effet. 15 aussi certaines valeurs traditionnelles, coutumières, et 16 se posent des questions sérieuses... parce qu'on parle 17 avec eux sur leur concept d'autonomie gouvernementale, 18 de souveraineté; souveraineté veut dire abandon de la Loi 19 sur les Indiens, veut dire une prise en charge coutumière 20 de leur définition de ce qu'ils sont. 21 cause beaucoup de choses. 22 23 Donc l'application de la Loi sur les Indiens, Eux remettent en question Donc ça remet en L'autre affaire aussi, c'est que la peur que certaines communautés autochtones ou que certaines StenoTran 290 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 nations autochtones ont de cette nation métisse, parce 2 que nous sommes parfois beaucoup, avec tout le respect... 3 avec tout le respect. 4 voient un peu comme un miroir de ce qu'ils sont aussi, 5 non seulement sur le plan physique mais sur le plan 6 intellectuel ou culturel. Je le dis dans le respect, ils nous 7 Donc c'est pour ça que nous avançons ce 8 dossier avec d'extrêmes précautions, parce que ce n'est 9 pas notre objectif de donner des leçons aux Premières 10 Nations, ce n'est pas notre objectif de les mettre dans 11 une situation insoutenable, mais toutes les questions qui 12 nous sont posées, soit par les populations du Québec et 13 canadienne ou la population autochtone du Québec... c'est 14 que justement la fameuse chose classique qui dit qu'avec 15 ce concept de nation métisse au Québec la moitié des gens 16 au Québec pourraient être métis; il y a peut-être une 17 possibilité là. 18 Mais la façon dont nous, on se voit comme 19 Métis, la nation métisse au Québec, dans ce concept global 20 de l'autonomie gouvernementale, c'est que c'est une raison 21 d'être, c'est une façon d'être dans le respect de cette 22 entité, de ce que nous sommes. 23 paquet de monde, parce que n'oubliez jamais, Monsieur Donc ça peut éliminer un StenoTran 291 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Dussault, que le ticket sanguin n'est pas le seul ticket 2 d'importance pour être Métis. 3 Nations sont métissées, mais pas nécessairement métisses. 4 5 Beaucoup de Québécois sont métissés mais pas nécessairement Métis. 6 7 Métis, c'est ici, c'est là, c'est là. C'est bien important. 8 9 Beaucoup de Premières COPRÉSIDENT RENÉ DUSSAULT: Monsieur Aubin, vous venez de donner un peu votre vision de 10 l'Association métisse du Québec. 11 tantôt que c'était une vision différente de l'Alliance 12 laurentienne, et je sais que l'Alliance laurentienne avait 13 été invitée ici. 14 de l'Alliance; hier il n'y en avait pas. 15 Vous avez mentionné Je ne sais pas s'il y a des représentants Peut-être que ce serait utile que vous 16 nous disiez la différence avec la vision de l'Alliance 17 laurentienne. 18 Ça clarifierait. CLAUDE AUBIN: Je n'aime pas parler des 19 autres. Ce serait peut-être préférable que vous leur 20 posiez la question. 21 association -- parce que même si je suis Métis je peux 22 être membre des Chevaliers de Colomb, je peux être membre 23 de n'importe quelle corporation au Canada -- la différence Mais, comme membre de cette StenoTran 292 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 est: la notion métisse, entité gouvernementale 2 nationale. 3 L'Alliance autochtone du Québec est une 4 corporation de services. 5 être qu'une corporation de services, elle veut avoir accès 6 à l'autonomie gouvernementale dans le respect d'une 7 identité propre. 8 La nation métisse ne désire pas L'Alliance autochtone est une 9 corporation de services qui dessert les Métis, les Indiens 10 hors réserve, les Indiens statués hors réserve, les Indiens 11 sans statut hors réserve. 12 services, point. 13 C'est une corporation de COPRÉSIDENT RENÉ DUSSAULT: Dernière 14 question. 15 confédération nationale métisse à l'échelle du Canada. 16 Est-ce que vous voyez des liens entre la nation métisse 17 du Québec et la nation métisse de l'ouest, de Louis Riel 18 originellement? 19 Est-ce que vous pourriez revenir là-dessus? 20 Vous avez mentionné tantôt que vous voyiez une Vous nous en avez parlé à Montréal. CLAUDE AUBIN: Quand on parle de cette 21 vision de cette confédération-là, elle entre dans la vision 22 de la grande confédération des nations autochtones du 23 Canada. Comme vous le savez, on peut parler de StenoTran 293 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 constitution canadienne, on peut parler de beaucoup de 2 choses, de gouvernement canadien et de promotion de 3 création d'autonomie gouvernementale, mais il y a une chose 4 qu'il faut qu'on réalise: 5 des Premières Nations... la nouvelle nation de la 6 prophétie, la nation métisse, a toujours été là. 7 L'autonomie gouvernementale Une chose, dans cette vision de la grande 8 confédération... oui, il y a un lien. 9 entrer, selon la juridiction originaire des nations 10 autochtones, pour être capable de joindre la grande 11 confédération des nations autochtones du Canada -- la 12 grande confédération -- dans le respect de chacune des 13 confédérations qui existent, soit la Confédération 14 wabénaki, la Confédération des Six Nations, la 15 Confédération des Grands Lacs, la Confédération des Sept 16 Nations, la Confédération des Trois Feux, et j'en passe... 17 parce que là, on implique un contexte territorial global 18 de l'Île de la Tortue et non pas les États-Unis ou le Canada 19 ou les provinces ou les états individuels. 20 C'est que pour Pour concerter cette vision de 21 respect... il ne faut pas oublier non plus que le Métis 22 National Council est une corporation, que MMF est une 23 corporation qui essaie fortement d'entrer dans cette StenoTran 294 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 vision d'une entité nationale gouvernementale souveraine. 2 Mais cette vision de cette confédération-là, c'est d'unir 3 dans une unité nationale et confédérale, pour tous les 4 Métis dans le respect de toutes les disparités et 5 diversités régionales et communautaires, une entité d'une 6 vision d'unité et de développer dans le respect de cet 7 ensemble l'histoire totale du développement de la nation 8 métisse. 9 10 Comme je vous ai dit -- je ne sais pas si je l'ai dit à Montréal -- quand Mme Riel vous a dit: 11 "Écoutez, ce petit gars-là, Louis Riel, c'est un petit 12 gars de chez nous, de Lavaltrie", Mme Riel, ce n'est pas 13 ça qu'elle voulait dire. 14 c'est que la philosophie, la pensée métisse, le 15 développement de ce que les Métis avaient subi dans l'est 16 était juste une continuité de ce qui a continué dans les 17 provinces des prairies et qui a abouti jusqu'au Yukon. 18 Donc l'histoire a toujours un début, mais elle n'a pas 19 toujours une fin, l'histoire; elle continue. Ce qu'elle voulait vous dire, 20 Donc la confédération... et c'est pour 21 ça que, de façon symbolique, le retour du drapeau, qui, 22 l'été passé -- prêté par la Commission -- s'est promené 23 dans l'est et est revenu avec une étoile, c'est la nouvelle StenoTran 295 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 vision, c'est notre connexion de toute cette 2 confédération-là. 3 grande confédération métisse, dans une entité nationale, 4 nous pourrons joindre la grande confédération; pas 5 l'Assemblée des Premières Nations, la grande confédération 6 des nations autochtones. 7 Et lorsque nous serons unis dans une Cette vision-là nous est donnée par nos 8 anciens. Elle ne vient pas de moi, elle nous est donnée 9 par cette prophétie. Les anciens font une semence non 10 seulement dans les Premières Nations mais ils le font aussi 11 chez nous. 12 d'amitié. 13 encore. 14 15 On l'a déjà fait en 1701 et on peut le faire MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: Thank you, Claude. 16 17 Donc c'est une vision d'unité, de paix et Who else would like to speak to Question Number 1? 18 Georges? 19 CO-CHAIR GEORGES ERASMUS: In relation 20 to Question Number 1, could we get some ideas from people 21 whether they are looking at community structures or 22 regional structures or looking at a structure of government 23 that is larger than that? We don't need great StenoTran 296 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 elaborations, we just want to have some of what people 2 are thinking about. 3 4 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: At the end of the table? 5 HENRY WETELAINEN, First Vice President, 6 Ontario Métis Aboriginal Association: I guess this is 7 some work that we have done on these elements already and 8 communities are going for a larger area, larger than the 9 community base. It would be based upon traditional uses 10 of land in the area. 11 communities, the smaller communities. 12 must be aware of the facts that are affecting the government 13 that's operating in this country right now. 14 I am talking about our rural I think that we If you take Ontario, which has 800 and 15 some municipalities, they are over-governed right now. 16 They are looking at amalgamation of those systems. 17 I think if we start looking at that system as an ideal 18 system of government, that system is about to change. 19 The taxpayers just can't afford it. 20 is that we have included a number of communities in areas, 21 taken on a regional scope, and this has come from the 22 communities. 23 So, what we have done We have done this in two areas. StenoTran So, I can't 297 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 speak for all of the communities in Ontario, but I can 2 just speak for the ones that we have done some in-depth 3 work on. 4 communities, which comprises an area of approximately 5 3,500 square miles and includes about seven communities, 6 and these smaller communities would range in size from 7 about 200, 300, mostly being mixed. 8 Métis communities, some are mixed of Métis off reserve. 9 Those would be the eastern Lake Nipigon Some are all pure That's one of the experiences that we have. 10 We have set up regional corporations in 11 Ontario. The regional corporations would be larger than 12 those community-based -- I look at it as a community-base, 13 not as, per se, a community of 250 people. 14 as sort of like an extended family that we have done in 15 that area that I am talking about as a 3,500 square mile 16 block. I look at it That was done on traditional use of land. 17 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: Thank you. 18 Anyone else? 19 RÉJAN PILOTE, (Vice-Président, Alliance Go ahead. 20 autochtone du Québec): Pour la nation métisse au Québec, 21 nous, on pense que toute nation est basée sur le peuple; 22 l'histoire d'une nation, c'est toujours l'histoire du 23 peuple. Donc, c'est le fondement d'une nation. StenoTran Après, 298 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 il y a aussi les structures communautaires et une structure 2 nationale, qui est la nation métisse au Québec. 3 Au niveau de cette structure 4 gouvernementale aussi on croit que chaque communauté doit 5 profiter des conseils des sages et des conseils des mères 6 et au niveau du grand conseil de la nation également. 7 Je voudrais juste rajouter également, 8 au sujet de tout ce qui s'est dit depuis ce matin, que 9 je crois qu'un des arguments qu'il faut rajouter à ce que 10 M. Aubin dit -- je veux peut-être mettre plus de force 11 dessus -- c'est que l'histoire métisse au Canada ne sera 12 jamais complète tant qu'on n'y inclura pas l'histoire des 13 Métis du Québec. 14 peu ce que M. Aubin a dit tout à l'heure. Ça, c'est juste pour renforcer un petit 15 Je ne veux pas en dire plus, parce qu'on 16 a mentionné qu'on voulait être court sur nos interventions. 17 On va sûrement avoir l'occasion de revenir sur les autres 18 questions. 19 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: Would anyone 20 else like to speak to Question Number 1 or we will move 21 on? 22 Kirby? 23 KIRBY LETHBRIDGE, Labrador Métis StenoTran 299 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Association: 2 the communities in Labrador and along the coast where most 3 of our members live, the communities have a history of 4 cooperative social structure and one thing that really 5 has caused our people to suffer is the idea that because 6 of some jurisdiction on an island hundreds of miles 7 away -- a city up in central Canada nearly thousands of 8 miles away had jurisdiction over our resources. 9 approach was to maximize profit for private enterprise. 10 I will keep it short. I think, looking at Their That's never been the way of our people. 11 So, I think one thing that we would like 12 to see, one thing that we, from discussions that I have 13 had with people and from what I heard people put their 14 seal of approval on, is the development of community-owned 15 cooperatives rather than private enterprise. 16 17 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: Thank you, Kirby. 18 Go ahead. 19 RICHARD LAFFERTY, Métis Nation N.W.T.: 20 With respect to Question 1, I am always perplexed by 21 questions like this because when you are speaking of a 22 nation, everybody has an idea of what a nation is and we 23 are calling ourselves a Métis nation. StenoTran I mean a nation 300 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 includes community-based government structures and when 2 you have a number of communities, that just logically 3 assumes that it's regional in scope. 4 As far as the Métis Nation of the 5 Northwest Territories is concerned, there is 6 community-based regional governments in a larger regional 7 context. 8 examples are everywhere. 9 community-based regional type of government. So, there is two levels of regions there. Canada is an example of a We are 10 speaking of a nation here, not of little spotted 11 service-type organizations. 12 That's all I have. 13 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 14 The Thank you. Thank you, Richard. 15 Why don't we move on to Question Number 16 2, if that's all right with everyone, and talk a bit about 17 preparations necessary towards the implementation of 18 self-government and some of the groundwork that perhaps 19 is necessary? 20 21 22 23 Who would like to begin talking about what preparations are necessary? RÉJAN PILOTE: Go ahead. Même si j'en ai glissé un mot hier, la nation métisse au Québec voit StenoTran 301 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 l'implantation... nous croyons effectivement qu'il doit 2 y avoir une transition entre l'implantation d'un 3 gouvernement métis au Québec et sa mise en oeuvre ou sa 4 prise en charge de tous les dossiers qui ont trait à son 5 peuple. 6 Pour ça, nous avons déjà écrit et nous 7 voulons rencontrer le ministre des Affaires 8 intergouvernementales pour discuter des besoins de la 9 nation métisse au Québec. Nous voulons mettre en oeuvre 10 un secrétariat de la nation métisse au Québec qui serait 11 chargé de consulter, d'informer et peut-être même 12 d'éduquer un peu les gens sur la belle histoire des Métis 13 au Québec. 14 recherches, parce qu'il y a beaucoup d'information qui 15 n'est pas disponible ou qui a été détruite dans divers 16 événements au Québec; toute l'histoire du Québec est très 17 peu connue à ce niveau-là. 18 C'est sûr qu'on devra mettre sur pied des Nous devons également développer une 19 structure, la structure gouvernementale de la nation 20 métisse au Québec. 21 processus d'énumération et d'enregistrement des Métis, 22 nous devons être en mesure de monter des tables de 23 négociation et nous devons aussi avoir les moyens pour Nous devons mettre sur pied un StenoTran 302 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 le faire. 2 Donc ça, c'est un petit peu le mécanisme 3 de transition pour la prise en charge des Métis par les 4 Métis. 5 aller de l'avant d'ici à l'automne... ou, en tout cas, 6 selon le livre rouge des Libéraux; je ne sais pas s'ils 7 vont passer de la parole à l'acte. 8 rouge du gouvernement fédéral, ils veulent aller de l'avant 9 dans la mise en oeuvre de l'autonomie gouvernementale des 10 Nous croyons que le gouvernement fédéral veut Mais, d'après le livre peuples autochtones. 11 Nous croyons que ça doit se faire à la 12 vitesse et dans la mesure où les Métis sont prêts à prendre 13 en charge les dossiers. 14 se faire un à un, avec toutes les recherches nécessaires 15 dans les divers dossiers qui vont être négociés. 16 ce qui est très, très important -- et je veux vraiment 17 mettre de l'emphase là-dessus -- c'est que le gouvernement 18 doit donner les moyens pour y arriver, et je crois que 19 les Métis ont beaucoup de chemin à rattraper pour arriver 20 à bon port. 21 22 23 Donc, moi, je pense que ça doit MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: that's very helpful. Claude? StenoTran Mais Thank you, 303 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 CLAUDE AUBIN: J'aimerais juste 2 rajouter ceci. J'aimerais juste aviser la Commission 3 encore une fois que la nation métisse au Québec n'est pas 4 une entité reconnue. 5 présentement nous ne voulons pas... et nous vous avisons 6 que nous aimerions que vous négociez avec nous, que le 7 fédéral négocie avec nous plutôt que de négocier avec une 8 corporation de services, parce que l'on parle de deux 9 entités différentes. Nous nous reconnaissons, mais On parle d'un concept national, 10 l'autonomie gouvernementale nationale, versus un concept 11 d'autonomie gouvernementale corporative. 12 Donc, si vous dites, comme on nous dit 13 tout le temps, "L'Alliance autochtone du Québec est l'outil 14 avec lequel vous devez transiger", vous nous remettez 15 encore en arrière. 16 continuer, on va continuer pareil, ça va prendre plus de 17 temps, mais à la lueur de cette situation-là, je dois vous 18 aviser -- ce que M. Pilote a dit -- que ça se fait dans 19 un contexte de Métis, par des Métis, pour des Métis. Ça n'empêche pas que nous, on va 20 Donc si, dans la question 2, vous nous 21 obligez à aller à des corporations de services et que vous 22 ne financez que des corporations de services -- comme 23 présentement il y a une consultation qui se fait au Québec StenoTran 304 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 à travers du financement du ministère des Affaires 2 intergouvernementales -- le fait métis va être noyé dans 3 ce concept global des Indiens hors réserve de l'Alliance 4 autochtone du Québec. 5 Merci. 6 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 7 Claude. 8 9 Thank you, Would anyone else like to speak to Question Number 2? 10 Go ahead. ALBERT LaBLANCE, President, 11 Southhampton Métis & Aboriginal Association: 12 talking Métis self-government here, the First Nations are 13 talking self-government. 14 combined. 15 Métis, self-government with First Nations. 16 self-governments are we going to have? 17 have to be combined. 18 You are Somewhere they have to be You are talking about self-government with How many Somewhere they Before they can be combined, I think that 19 the Aboriginal people have to have more respect for 20 themselves. 21 to make sure that they are clean from substance abuses. 22 We have to make sure that our children get educated because 23 this process will not work with an eighth grade education We have to take care of our children, we have StenoTran 305 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 and willing to sit back and get a government cheque. 2 have to have people that are self-supporting, that do not 3 rely on government, and we must work with First Nations. 4 So, in order to talk self-government, 5 you have to have the federal, the provincial, First Nations 6 and the Métis all sit down and talk about it and all agree. 7 Until that day comes, I cannot see self-government working 8 because you have four factions of people that want power, 9 that are going to be fighting for that power, and they 10 We must agree if that power is going to be given out. 11 Thank you. 12 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 13 RICHARD LAFFERTY: Richard? I would just like to 14 ask the previous speaker a question. You are putting a 15 lot of prerequisites on developing Métis self-government. 16 It's my understanding that the reasoning behind pushing 17 for Métis self-government is to be able to be in control 18 and help our people in all their difficult problems, social 19 problems, cultural, genocide, whatever the case may be. 20 21 This is the whole reasoning for standing 22 up and fighting for self-government and with prerequisites 23 like this, I am wondering about how we are going to work StenoTran 306 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 with other types of governments. 2 too many prerequisites. 3 you mean by solving all these problems before anything 4 is initiated. 5 I think there are way Maybe you could just explain what ALBERT LaBLANCE: I didn't say "solving 6 problems", I said talking about them, getting together, 7 understanding. 8 yourselves, self-government is not going to work and, let's 9 face it, Aboriginal people does include reserve Indians If you are going to fight amongst 10 and at this stage I do not see reserve Indians talking 11 to us. 12 In Quebec they do not recognize Métis, 13 so what are you talking about? In Quebec alone, the 14 provincial government does not talk to the Métis, the First 15 Nations does not talk to the Métis, the federal government 16 does talk to the Métis. 17 that only the federal government recognizes or do we have 18 a self-government that everybody recognizes? 19 everybody does not recognize each other's class or ability 20 or whatever, then it's not going to work. So, do we have a self-government I think if 21 Perhaps that's the lead that the federal 22 government has to put in, that First Nations, the federal 23 and the provincial governments all have to sit down and StenoTran 307 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 talk about self-government and get a framework or a motto 2 -- for this situation will work. 3 the first initiative ourselves and the First Nations people 4 and getting our people educated, getting our people so 5 they are no longer abusing chemicals to their body, getting 6 them educated. 7 But we also have to take It's going to be a long process. This 8 isn't going to happen next year or the year after. 9 get pride, it takes generations and I think our people 10 have to become proud first. 11 Thank you. 12 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 13 Mary and then Martin. 14 15 To COMMISSIONER MARY SILLETT: Thank you very much, Donavon. 16 I just want to say that I was very, very 17 interested in what you were saying because it's something 18 that we have heard from many, many people in our public 19 hearings, particularly women, saying that before 20 self-government becomes a reality, healing must begin in 21 our communities. 22 Also, we have heard the position that 23 Richard Lafferty has pointed out and then we have heard StenoTran 308 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 from other people that these processes are very, very long, 2 they are very long term. 3 long term, as is self-government, and those two processes 4 must go hand-in-hand. For example, healing is very 5 I just wanted to say that I was very 6 interested in what you were saying and, as well, if we 7 can remember back to yesterday's session, I think we heard 8 the concern from many Métis women about the kinds of 9 difficulties that they are experiencing with their current 10 governments. For that reason, we have heard many women 11 say that the reason that we are hesitant towards 12 self-government, for example, is because we are not 13 confident in the abilities of our current governments and, 14 with more power, what will that mean to us and our children. 15 So, I am personally a bit disappointed 16 that the Aboriginal women that spoke yesterday aren't here 17 to participate in some of these discussions, but I would 18 like to thank you both. 19 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: Thanks, Mary. 20 Martin? 21 MARTIN DUNN, Aboriginal Rights 22 Consultant: Actually, picking up on the two previous 23 speakers, as I'm sure you are aware, the Native Council StenoTran 309 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 of Canada was involved in a massive urban study of six 2 cities, what the Aboriginal peoples, the off-reserve 3 Aboriginal peoples, at least in those cities, thought about 4 self-government. 5 I was involved in the editing of that 6 process, so I was going through a lot of the raw material 7 and I was astounded by the degree of suspicion in the 8 Aboriginal community about self-government and what that 9 might imply and it seemed to take two forms. One form 10 was the one we have just heard, which says are we ready; 11 the other was does it mean that governmental systems that 12 we manage to escape by leaving the reserves are now going 13 to be moved into the cities and take us over. 14 So, there were two sets of fears out 15 there, both, from my own personal point of view, based 16 on ignorance of what was being proposed, at least at the 17 constitutional level in terms of both the 1983-87 process 18 and the Charlottetown process. 19 difficulties is where you begin in this whole process. 20 I remember Mr. Erasmus telling governments that no matter 21 how bad a job Aboriginal people did in governing 22 themselves, they couldn't possibly do any worse than what 23 white governments are doing for us now, and I take that I think one of the StenoTran 310 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 as a base. 2 We can't do worse, so I don't think we 3 have to prove ourselves in the sense of education even, 4 but that's not to say that we -- well, let's put it this 5 way. 6 a national agenda item was in the constitutional process 7 as a technique for incorporating a number of issues that 8 no one wanted to deal with directly. 9 deal with the sense of sovereignty that some Aboriginal 10 11 I think the process by which self-government became Nobody wanted to peoples were bringing to the table. So, instead of using the word 12 "sovereignty", they began to use the word "jurisdiction" 13 because that was less threatening, even though it meant 14 different things to either side. "Jurisdiction" meant 15 sovereignty to Aboriginal people. It didn't necessarily 16 mean sovereignty to some governments, so they were willing 17 to sit down and talk about jurisdiction, but they weren't 18 willing to sit down and talk about sovereignty, some 19 governments weren't. 20 As that process developed, 21 self-government became a panacea for addressing the 22 difficult issues and out of it came the idea, rightly or 23 wrongly, that if Aboriginal communities had the capacity StenoTran 311 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 to make decisions for themselves, a lot of these larger 2 issues of principle would resolve themselves in the process 3 of negotiation because each community, no matter how small 4 or how large, would negotiate it on the basis of what was 5 real for them, on what they needed, so that a very 6 traditional community would negotiate a form of government 7 or a model of government, if you like, very different than 8 an urban community might negotiate. 9 So, the problem then became how to 10 identify these communities and how to set up a mechanism 11 by which that process could begin, the process of 12 negotiating whatever forms of self-government might 13 ultimately exist. 14 agreement that we had the resolution for that. 15 I thought at least in the Charlottetown Everybody agreed to it. It's there. The weakest link in that process 16 was how communities become eligible for negotiation and 17 that's the area in which Métis are very, very critically 18 positioned, negatively positioned you might say. 19 There is a huge infrastructure. The 20 oldest bureaucracy on the face of the North American 21 continent, the Department of Indian Affairs, is prepared 22 to deal with their communities and "communities" to them 23 means "reserves". You don't have to dig very deep behind StenoTran 312 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 the words they use to find out that's what "community" 2 means when the Department of Indian Affairs uses it. 3 Of course, outside the Department of 4 Indian Affairs there are large numbers of Aboriginal people 5 who are using that word in a very different way and, as 6 a result, a problem has been generated in that how do 7 governments recognize a Métis community. 8 a Métis community? 9 that they occupy more or less exclusively or it is 20,000 10 people in an area occupied by two or three million people? 11 That became a problem that we have to focus on in terms 12 What comprises Is it 200 people in an exclusive area of beginning. 13 Until we have a mechanism in place, and 14 by "we" again I mean Canadians have a mechanism in place, 15 to recognize or to create even eligibility criteria by 16 which communities can come forward and say, "We match the 17 criteria you have proposed and, therefore, you must begin 18 negotiations with us" -- that's basically what the 19 Charlottetown Accord said. 20 community was recognized, governments, provincial and 21 federal governments, were constitutionally committed to 22 begin a negotiation process to develop self-government 23 agreements. It said that once our I think that's still the stumbling block StenoTran 313 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 because the criteria for recognition of Aboriginal 2 communities has not been established. 3 There is a proposal by the NCC, which 4 I think was put before the Commission in other 5 circumstances, an Authorities Act, where the federal 6 government is being asked to pass legislation which will 7 in fact set up a kind of commission structure, which will 8 be able to receive applications from various communities 9 for recognition. Some want recognition as bands. Some 10 now currently off-reserve Bill C-31 communities want 11 recognition as bands under the Indian Act. 12 they want and they are entitled to that, if that's what 13 they want. 14 That's what There are other communities who are 15 avoiding that like the plague. They want independent 16 recognition in the sense of Métis settlements -- and that's 17 valid -- and there should be a mechanism by which those 18 communities can become recognized in the context that's 19 viable for them. 20 interest, that I have been calling them, at any rate, for 21 some years now, that should have the opportunity at least 22 to propose themselves as a community of interest that would 23 have decision-making capacity and perhaps even law-making Then there are urban communities of StenoTran 314 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 capacity over specific areas of jurisdiction. 2 So, all of these things begin with a 3 mechanism by which Aboriginal communities can be 4 recognized as being eligible for negotiating 5 self-government. 6 it may take them 20 years to get through the negotiations; 7 if they are highly adept, it may take them six months. 8 9 If those communities are uneducated, So, you have a leavening process or a sorting-out process built right in at the beginning. The 10 critical point, though, is how is this Commission or this 11 body, this Tribunal, or whatever phraseology you want to 12 attach to it, how is it created, what powers does it have, 13 and how do they determine the criteria for recognition. 14 15 I think that that's an area that the 16 Commission could well address itself to, in the sense of 17 examining the data that's come before them, to determine 18 what criteria would be most inclusive in terms of creating 19 the capacity for communities to apply for self-government 20 mechanisms and processes at whatever level and whatever 21 degree of complexity, some on the level of nation, if they 22 are prepared to do that, if the larger community is prepared 23 to do that, some on the level of municipality if that's StenoTran 315 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 as far as that community is able to go, some on the basis 2 of band if that's the perception that the people involved 3 have. 4 I think I will leave it at that for the 5 time being. This will come up again, I think, in terms 6 of impediments and solutions. 7 8 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: Martin. 9 I have Mary and then Rock. 10 COMMISSIONER MARY SILLETT: 11 Thanks, Thanks again, Donavon. 12 I think I would just like to focus back 13 on the question of Number 2. 14 presentations, I did hear, for example, Richard talk about 15 there having been some progress with respect to the Métis 16 in the N.W.T. and I am just wondering, based on that 17 experience of the Métis in the Territories, do you have 18 any answers to this particular question? 19 Yesterday when I heard the RICHARD LAFFERTY: I can't say that I 20 have any answers because I don't believe any individual 21 does. 22 the Territories, that we have a table to develop a process. 23 But I believe, the way things are proceeding in All we have is an initial table. StenoTran Now the bargaining 316 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 begins. 2 the N.W.T. 3 sitting at that table with the President of the Métis 4 nation. 5 That's on a nation level, the Métis nation of When we sit at that table, we have the regions There are three regions not in claims, 6 not under self-government agreements already. 7 the North Slave, South Slave and the Deschot (ph) and each 8 one of those representatives from the regions is directed 9 by the communities in their region. 10 There is So, I think what needs to be the process, 11 actually, is a political process first. 12 will for this Métis self-government has to be there, which 13 it seems to be in the Territories. 14 kick in in developing the political and the administrative 15 process is following. 16 believe, by the government person from Ontario that as 17 soon as there is political will and policy, financial and 18 administrative things kick in. 19 The political The financial has to It was stated before as well, I The human resources have always been 20 there. We have been working on a volunteer basis for 20 21 years and we are still, in most cases, working on a 22 volunteer basis on all levels. 23 now is something that will follow the political. It's there. StenoTran The legal 317 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 I don't see how come people get so mixed 2 up. Maybe it's just because I have seen it from a different 3 angle or something, but I know in the provinces it's 4 different as well because you have a provincial government 5 which is apprehensive to Métis politics and that sort of 6 thing. 7 as soon as there is the political will. But the process will take care of itself, I think, 8 9 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: Thanks, Richard. 10 I have two speakers on Question Number 11 2 and then we would like to move on to Question Number 12 3. 13 Question Number 3. So, Rock and then Kirby and then we will move on to 14 ROCK J. MATTE, Consultant: I think some 15 of the points raised by Richard were very important and 16 valuable. 17 fundamental questions in regards to Number 2, which is, 18 as I read it, "What preparations are necessary towards 19 implementation of Métis self-government (legal, 20 political, financial, administrative, human resources)?" 21 Definitely -- and I think there is no 22 doubt about it, in my mind -- we have to have a sense of 23 ownership into what's going to be implemented out there. As well, Kirby yesterday alluded to one of the StenoTran 318 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 If there is no sense of ownership, we are going to still 2 be watching the train go by. We have and we must, as 3 people, have an input at all levels because for too long 4 we have watched the train go by. 5 In input I am not talking about one or 6 two or three people, I am talking about a vast consultation 7 about it, which is not a waste of time whatsoever, and 8 even if we don't put any more elements into it, at least 9 we have the feeling and the sense that we are putting our 10 input into it. No process, I would believe, would have 11 less than 75 per cent, if not more, of Indian input, in 12 itself, which is not actually happening in this country. 13 So, the more we are going to be able to put an input into 14 it, the less we are going to have to waste time in trying 15 to implement something that we don't have a sense that 16 we had real input into. 17 I believe over the last 20 years, if we 18 look at an example that's not too far from the Canadian 19 experience in terms of a quest for self-government and 20 a quest for more autonomy, is the process under which the 21 province of Quebec went into it, under which it would have 22 been not acceptable for them as people, to have less than 23 50 per cent input in any policies touching that territory. StenoTran 319 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 So, if they had it and if we are talking 3 about a partnership as Métis people, we are obligated to 4 look into having a valuable input into it -- that's what 5 is the base of a partnership -- and before that happens, 6 we can't talk about partnership. 7 That's it. 8 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 9 A brief comment from Kirby and then we 10 Thanks, Rock. will move on to Question 3. 11 KIRBY LETHBRIDGE: One of the problems 12 that we have, I think probably the number one problem, 13 is who actually has jurisdiction and responsibility toward 14 Métis peoples. 15 certainly doesn't feel that they have any responsibility. 16 In actual fact, of course, he maintains that there are 17 18 We know that in our province Clyde Wells no Métis people east of Hudson Bay. So, I think the government needs to iron 19 out its problems first, the federal/provincial thing. 20 They need to get their heads together and to decide once 21 and for all that somebody has jurisdiction, who the hell 22 is it, and take your responsibilities seriously. 23 The other thing is finances. StenoTran We have 320 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 political institutions that are struggling along. 2 Richard said, volunteerism is a wonderful thing and an 3 honourable thing and you can't ask for much more from a 4 group of volunteers than what we get. 5 it makes life very difficult and it just creates animosity 6 among the people in the communities because everyone is 7 expecting so much more from a group of volunteers, which 8 is very unfair. 9 as a set-up to fail. 10 As I will tell you, It's almost as if it is being incorporated I think that resources should be made 11 available for a gathering of the peoples in the 12 confederacy, resources to permit dialogue among our 13 peoples. 14 leaders, Métis women's groups, youth, and experts we 15 identify to assist us in rekindling and reactivating our 16 concepts of the way we relate to each other. 17 We would like to include elders, community I also think that the government should 18 allow our people to present our choices, our community 19 choices, not some leader that's sold to us every four years 20 in provincial or federal politics, but for us to select 21 our own community leaders who are going to come forth to 22 take training, to do whatever is required. 23 You have to remember that in southern StenoTran 321 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Labrador last year at the Combined Councils of Labrador 2 Annual General Meeting it was noted that 43 per cent of 3 the people in the provincial district that I come from 4 had less than a grade 9 education. 5 training dollars for our people. 6 think, that's a prerequisite to any sort of thing. 7 goes back to what you said. So, we need real That's one thing, I It 8 I think they should also provide at this 9 point in time for a cultural exchange process among the 10 various Métis communities in the country, not make it an 11 east/west thing before we get out on the water. 12 That's all I want to say. 13 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 14 Thank you. Thank you, Kirby. 15 We will now move on to Question Number 16 3, if that's okay, because I know there are a couple of 17 people who would like to speak to that. 18 3 we are interested primarily in looking at the 19 implementation of self-government and the provision of 20 services. 21 In Question Number As I said earlier, we have heard on the 22 Prairies Métis people say that self-government and the 23 provision of services ought to be on a Métis-only basis. StenoTran 322 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 We haven't heard that in other parts of the country. 2 So, we would like to talk a bit about that, the 3 implementation of self-government and how services should 4 be provided. 5 Included within that would be some 6 discussion on the priority areas of transfer, what are 7 the real areas that ought to be transferred to Métis 8 governments in the transition phase. 9 10 11 Would you like to begin at the end of the table? GREG SCHOFIELD, Board Member, Louis Riel 12 Métis Council, Surrey, British Columbia: 13 language spoken-no translation). 14 I would just like to begin with this morning along with 15 Question 3 is I just would like to kind of plant the seed 16 and leave you with a Cree word that, as Métis people, has 17 always been a very important word to us. 18 word is "katipaimsoochick". 19 that own themselves". 20 (Native One of the things that In Cree that That word means "the people We have always considered ourselves a 21 nation of people who own ourselves. 22 people who have had dealings with the federal and 23 provincial governments, we have been excluded from a lot StenoTran Unlike First Nations 323 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 of that process. We have basically maintained our 2 lifestyle and our culture and our identity as Métis people, 3 so that word is very important to us. 4 Along the lines of service delivery with 5 the Louis Riel Métis Council, one of the things that we 6 are doing is we are providing, or trying to, with our 7 limited funding, which is annually about $5,000 a year, 8 to implement our services to our community people. 9 of the things that we are looking at and we put great One 10 importance on is education, for one, and also with Métis 11 children and with family services and things like that. 12 Like I said, unfortunately, we have very little funding 13 to be, what I would have to say probably, extremely 14 successful with that. 15 I would just like to share a little bit 16 with the other representatives some of -- actually, I had 17 shared yesterday our perceptions on social services and 18 things like that within the communities. 19 what I will do is I will leave the discussion to begin 20 with somebody else and then I can just kind of pick up 21 and get my thoughts straightened out. Actually, maybe 22 Thanks. 23 CO-CHAIR GEORGES ERASMUS: StenoTran Could I get 324 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 a little bit of background on what we are trying to get 2 here? 3 -- we are trying to do a bit of a survey to see where people's 4 intentions are in relation to how services are going to 5 be delivered. 6 or not you have opinions on self-government. 7 already dealt with that. 8 9 The first part of the question, for us, is simply In this case, we are not asking whether We have We are wanting to know whether you are in support of institutions that are going to be 10 specifically run only by the Métis for the Métis -- for 11 instance, in downtown Vancouver or Victoria -- and 12 side-by-side there will be another program run for First 13 Nation people or do you see something worthwhile in merging 14 the two and having a delivery system that perhaps benefits 15 by economies of scale and delivers services to all 16 Aboriginal people in the area, make sure that the 17 institution is going to deliver the service, is organized 18 in a way in which it's sensitive to everyone, or do you 19 want your own institutions to run that? 20 behind the status blind or Métis-specific. That's what's 21 Then later on perhaps we can get into 22 the priority issues on transfer of authority, which areas 23 you want to grab onto first. But for us it's important StenoTran 325 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 to get a reading on this because what we heard in the 2 Prairies was a fairly strong suggestion that the Métis 3 wanted to run their own services in that area. 4 quite hear it like that in places like British Columbia 5 and Ontario and Quebec when we were holding hearings, so 6 this is what we are trying to get a feel for here first. 7 Thanks. 8 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 9 We didn't Go ahead, and then Claude. 10 BERNIE HEARD, Labrador Métis 11 Association: 12 Labrador we have three Aboriginal groups. 13 Innu Nation, we have the Inuit Association and we have 14 the Métis Association. 15 areas. 16 services should be a joint venture between all three 17 groups. 18 Speaking specifically for Labrador, in We have the All three are in distinct land However, our feeling is that the delivery of That's our opinion. We already feel that the Inuit and the 19 Innu Nation in fact do accept us as a third Aboriginal 20 group, even though the provincial government does not. 21 The other Aboriginal groups appear to. 22 on certain things already. 23 triplication of services, we would much rather see it as We work together Rather than a duplication or StenoTran 326 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 a joint effort. 2 Thank you. 3 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 4 This gentleman and then Claude. 5 ROY CARDINAL, Native Council of Canada 6 (Alberta): I would like to talk on Number 3, 7 implementation of self-government and delivery of 8 services. 9 should we run our services, like in the cities and towns, Georges Erasmus, I guess, asked us about how 10 but I think that question is: 11 our lives? Should welfare keep running That's how I seem to understand the question. 12 What I would like to say is that section 13 91(24) states that the Aboriginal and Métis are included 14 in the Constitution and, under section 35(1), The 15 Aboriginal and Métis -- I would like to include "Métis" 16 also there -- have the right to assume control over its 17 own affairs within the core areas of Aboriginal 18 jurisdiction at its own initiative and without necessarily 19 waiting for intergovernmental agreements. 20 Therefore, for many Métis people, 21 self-government will have little authentic or no meaning 22 without secure long-term fiscal arrangements, as well as 23 increased access to lands and resources to allow for StenoTran 327 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 greater self-sufficiency because we are not talking just 2 about cities and towns, we are talking about a people who 3 are living on their own land. 4 The abstract power of self-government 5 is an empty vessel without the material ability to carry 6 on the normal functions of a modern government and an 7 adequate land and resource base to cope with current and 8 future populations. 9 processes that accompanied colonization, many Aboriginal 10 and Métis peoples have been deprived of their original 11 lands and means of livelihood and confined to small areas 12 with little economic potential. As a result of the historical 13 Therefore, I would like to remind the 14 Royal Commission to make a recommendation, as they have 15 been making recommendations, to make their recommendation 16 to the federal and provincial governments that the federal 17 and provincial governments have that responsibility, the 18 fiduciary responsibility to ensure that the land and 19 resource bases of Aboriginal and Métis people are enhanced 20 and, further, that sufficient financing be available to 21 allow services to be provided at levels comparable to those 22 in other parts of Canada. 23 The point here is we need a land base StenoTran 328 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 and resource base and the financing to be able to do our 2 own services. 3 4 Thank you. MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: Thank you very much. 5 We have less than 15 minutes, if you 6 could make your comments brief, because I do have a number 7 of speakers. 8 Go ahead, Claude. 9 CLAUDE AUBIN: To answer to the question 10 in a very specific manner, si on prend pour acquis, par 11 exemple, que l'implantation de l'autonomie 12 gouvernementale veut dire que déjà on accepte qu'il y a 13 une entité gouvernementale, présentement c'est difficile 14 de répondre à la question parce que les Métis au Québec 15 -- je suis obligé de parler du Québec -- nous vivons une 16 expérience épouvantable dans le contexte des Chemins de 17 la réussite, puisqu'on se sert de ce terme "status blind". 18 À l'intérieur de ça les Premières 19 Nations ont décidé, dans la refonte de la distribution 20 des services, que seuls ceux qui étaient des Métis statués 21 pouvaient avoir des services. 22 présentement, dans les Chemins de la réussite, les Métis 23 ne sont pas desservis. Donc au Québec Donc il va falloir approcher ça StenoTran 329 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 très prudemment. 2 en autant que c'est bien défini qu'un regroupement pour 3 donner des services à l'ensemble de tous les autochtones... 4 il va falloir s'assurer du respect des Métis et que les 5 Métis ne commencent pas encore à se faire questionner à 6 tout bout de champ, et que les Premières Nations ne 7 définiront pas qui sont les Métis, parce que c'est ce qui 8 se passe présentement, malheureusement. 9 "Status blind" va peut-être s'appliquer On doit aussi réfléchir de la 10 possibilité de le faire par Métis, entre Métis. 11 sont aussi très réalistes. 12 réalité-là, il y a des possibilités que certaines 13 livraisons de services puissent se faire conjointement 14 avec les Premières Nations. 15 choses que nous devrons retenir pour nous-mêmes. 16 dans ce contexte-là, tout se négocie, tout se discute entre 17 autochtones, et non pas imposé. 18 Les Métis Je pense que, dans cette Mais il y a certainement des Si c'est J'aimerais rajouter ceci -- et je parle 19 pour quelqu'un d'autre qui est assis à l'arrière -- je 20 voudrais juste donner un commentaire d'une minute. 21 voulait que je vous dise que le processus de guérison des 22 Métis entre Métis, ça peut seulement se faire parmi les 23 Métis. Il Donc c'était juste un commentaire qu'il voulait StenoTran 330 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 vous donner tout à l'heure. 2 Merci. 3 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 4 5 6 7 Thank you, Claude. Go ahead. There is time for both of you. So, why don't you go first. RÉJAN PILOTE: Je voulais dire que 8 Claude a très bien répondu à une partie de la question 9 pour les Métis du Québec. C'est qu'un des fondements de 10 ce problème-là que vivent les Métis au Québec est le fait 11 qu'assez souvent on associe présentement prise en charge 12 de certains dossiers avec la nomination de diverses 13 associations qui participent à diverses commissions sur 14 divers comités, et que le membership d'une association 15 peut toujours être critiqué ou être questionné, mais que 16 la citoyenneté d'un individu qui appartient à une nation 17 ne peut être critiquée et ne peut être questionnée. 18 Tant que cette question d'autonomie 19 gouvernementale tournera alentour, je crois... je parle 20 pour le Québec; je ne veux pas entrer dans d'autres 21 questions de d'autres régions. 22 alentour d'associations qui ont des intérêts des fois 23 autres que de défendre leur population, je pense qu'on Mais tant que ça tournera StenoTran 331 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 va toujours tourner alentour du problème et qu'on ne 2 réglera jamais la question ou qu'on n'apportera jamais 3 de solution à ce problème. 4 Donc, si on parle de gouvernement, on 5 parle donc de nation, on parle donc de contrôle par la 6 population des services qui sont donnés. 7 que certains apportent des fois la livraison de services 8 basée sur des institutions autochtones... je crois que 9 tous les gens ont droit à leur opinion, mais je pense qu'à 10 plusieurs endroits au Québec, plusieurs institutions au 11 Québec et au Canada ont des problèmes parce que ces 12 institutions-là sont contrôlées par des individus et en 13 fonction des besoins de quelques individus au lieu du 14 besoin collectif de la population. 15 Je pense aussi Je pense que la nation métisse au Québec 16 n'a pas l'intention d'appuyer le développement de 17 l'autonomie gouvernementale basée sur des institutions. 18 La population de la nation métisse au Québec est prêt 19 à collaborer dans la livraison de services dans les grands 20 centres urbains peut-être avec d'autres peuples 21 autochtones, mais ne le fera sûrement pas tant qu'on n'aura 22 pas une garantie que les argents ou les budgets qui seront 23 établis en fonction des services dans les grands centres StenoTran 332 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 urbains seront faits sur une base de poids démographique 2 des différentes nations et participants et avec le contrôle 3 et le respect des besoins des individus qui font partie 4 de différentes nations. 5 Le contexte urbain est un contexte, je 6 crois, qui est très particulier. C'est différent des 7 milieux ruraux. 8 autochtones en milieu urbain et on laisse de côté les 9 autochtones en milieu rural, mais je pense qu'il faut Souvent on entend parler seulement des 10 prendre ça dans le contexte global d'une nation avec 11 différentes réalités. 12 Moi, je crois que si la Commission peut 13 faire des recommandations dans ce sens-là, je pense que 14 peut-être qu'on va pouvoir commencer à discuter de 15 solutions plutôt que de discuter de problèmes. 16 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: Thank you. 17 We have time for about two more speakers. 18 BRUNO MEILLEUR, porte-parole, Alliance 19 autochtone du Québec: 20 c'est la première fois que je parle dans tout ça. 21 Je ne suis pas un grand orateur; Je veux dire que l'implantation de 22 self-government, pour moi... je regarde le peuple. 23 parle d'organismes, on parle de ci, on parle de ça. StenoTran On Il 333 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 faut revenir au peuple. 2 Je vais vous parler de mon expérience, 3 moi. Je vis dans une région rurale. Depuis 20 ans on 4 fait partie d'organismes politiques et ainsi de suite, 5 et, quand on a entendu parler d'autonomie gouvernementale, 6 pour nous autres ça voulait dire que pour une fois on 7 pouvait prendre le contrôle de notre destinée et de se 8 faire reconnaître pour ce qu'on est en tant que personnes. 9 Je peux vous dire qu'on vit dans des communautés mixtes, 10 mais le fait métis dans nos communautés n'est pas d'égal 11 à égal avec le reste de l'autre population. 12 Ce qui m'a poussé, moi, à aller vers une 13 nation, c'est qu'on a besoin de ça pour garantir que pour 14 une fois on va être respecté. 15 pose, moi, c'est comment sérieux est le gouvernement de 16 vouloir nous accorder l'autonomie gouvernementale. 17 pense au peuple. 18 Les questions que je me Je Je regarde ce qui se passe dans nos 19 écoles, pour nos enfants, notre culture. Il n'y a rien 20 qui pousse là. 21 culture québécoise bien souvent, et de partout. 22 soit dans la livraison des services sociaux, au niveau 23 du développement économique, on se fait toujours On est Métis mais on doit vivre selon la StenoTran Que ce 334 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 "barouetter" de part et d'autre. 2 L'ultime de ça, ça a été quand le 3 gouvernement à un moment donné a annoncé le programme des 4 Chemins de la réussite. 5 a fait des rencontres. 6 une fois, à travers les comités de gestion locale, on aurait 7 eu une chance de prendre nos affaires en main. 8 qu'est-ce qui est arrivé? 9 finales, quand on vient pour séparer le gâteau, on décide 10 On a travaillé bénévolement, on On avait grand espoir que pour Mais À la table des négociations que seulement les statués auront droit. 11 Dans le fond de mon coeur, moi, je vois 12 mon peuple, puis il pleure, mon peuple, il est en 13 souffrance. 14 essaie de commencer le processus. 15 être capable de retourner à nos valeurs culturelles 16 traditionnelles. 17 regroupement nationale qu'on va être capable de faire ça 18 en ce qui me concerne. 19 Quand on parle de healing, de guérison, on Mais pour ça, il faut C'est seulement à travers un Pour la livraison de services, c'est 20 tout ce qu'on regarde, de quelle manière moi, je peux venir 21 en aide à mon peuple. 22 moi, ça va être des mécanismes, des outils par lesquels 23 une fois, finalement, on va être capable de se développer L'autonomie gouvernementale, pour StenoTran 335 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 dans ce que nous sommes, avec une reconnaissance. 2 On parle premièrement d'un partenariat. 3 C'est certain que si on va vers une nation, notre premier 4 interlocuteur, c'est le gouvernement fédéral. 5 certain que si on parle de partenariat, il faut s'asseoir 6 avec la province et parler avec la province. 7 implique aussi qu'on veuille bien faire cela. 8 9 C'est Mais ça Comme je dis, l'important, c'est le peuple. Il faut retourner au peuple. On part avec la 10 nation, mais la nation va juste être là si le peuple est 11 là. 12 que dans la province de Québec la culture ne fait pas partie 13 du curriculum d'enseignement? 14 soit tous les services qui sont livrés dans le moment, 15 quand est-ce que vous entendez parler qu'on consulte les 16 Métis? 17 autochtones, il parle des réserves, il ne parle pas des 18 Métis. 19 la différence. 20 Et il faut retourner à la culture. Pourquoi est-ce C'est certain que, que ce Le gouvernement du Québec, quand il parle des Regardez bien. C'est pour ça qu'il faut faire Je pense que notre expérience de 21 corporation qui englobe tous les autochtones hors réserve 22 ne pourra pas rencontrer les besoins des Métis. 23 que ce soit spécifique à chacun, dans le respect de chacun, StenoTran Il faut 336 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 de ce que nous sommes. 2 On le dit, j'ai une croyance... on se 3 rejoindra un bon jour peut-être dans la grande 4 confédération, mais ce jour-là est encore loin. 5 travaille tous vers ça. 6 Je vous remercie. 7 MODERATOR DONAVON YOUNG: 8 On Thank you very much. 9 Unfortunately, we have run out of time. 10 We are going to take a 15-minute coffee break and come 11 back at 10:45 for Women and Community Decision-Making. 12 I would like to thank you all very much for your comments. 13 It was a good session, thank you. 14 --- Short recess at 10:30 a.m. 15 --- Upon resuming at 11:00 a.m. 16 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS, Senior Policy 17 Analyst, Policy & Planning: Good morning, everyone. I 18 will be your moderator for this portion of your circle. 19 20 I would invite all of the Métis women 21 that are in the hallway to please join us at the table. 22 23 This session this morning, as you note StenoTran 337 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 by your program, is with respect to Métis women and 2 community decision-making. 3 speak directly to my Métis sisters that were with us 4 yesterday afternoon, but I understand there is an 5 Aboriginal Justice and Women's Conference that is 6 happening today and I believe that many of those delegates 7 are attending there this morning. 8 9 I had initially planned to As a Métis woman myself, I wish they could have made some time to join us for this portion of 10 the meeting. I think it's very, very important. The 11 Commission has heard in its rounds of hearings and in 12 written submissions that there are some concerns of Métis 13 women across the country with respect to their 14 participation or lack of participation in the whole process 15 of self-government and I would have liked to have seen 16 the delegates here to contribute. 17 conference, but if they would have mentioned something 18 yesterday, I'm sure we could have accommodated the agenda 19 to have their participation. I was not aware of the 20 I would invite all of the participants 21 that are here to -- I know that in your community gatherings 22 the women at that level have probably -- not probably, 23 they have -- spoken up and have voiced their concerns to StenoTran 338 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 you at your community level, so I am very confident that 2 you gentlemen around this table can bring forth their 3 comments and concerns, as well as the comments and concerns 4 that have been raised at your communities, at your regional 5 level, at your provincial level, that have been forwarded 6 by the youth and, as well, by elders. 7 I think what I will do is follow the same 8 pattern as Donavon did and perhaps guide us through these 9 four questions and have some discussion around each of 10 the questions and invite you gentlemen to bring forward 11 your comments. 12 British Columbia who, I am sure, would like to speak. 13 With that, gentlemen, start your engines. I know we have one delegate with us from 14 Rhonda? 15 RHONDA JOHNSON, United Native Nations: 16 Thank you. Although I am a Métis woman, I absolutely 17 cannot speak on behalf of other Métis women and you are 18 quite correct in saying that the women who were here 19 yesterday would have been the appropriate women to sit 20 here and speak because they are the Métis women leaders 21 from across Canada. 22 for Métis women. 23 I am not a leader, so I can't speak I think, however, the fact that those StenoTran 339 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 women aren't here answers most of your questions. They 2 weren't here as participants, to begin with. 3 only, I think, two women's names on the participants list, 4 or perhaps even three; I'm not sure. 5 your question. 6 a rare occurrence for Métis women. 7 continually across Canada within our own circles with the 8 government. 9 yesterday to understand. There were That could answer This is not five out of 20. This is not This happens We only have to look at ourselves today and 10 Nonetheless, I will talk about what I 11 faced as a Métis woman and what some of the major issues 12 were for myself. Poverty; that's a big one. 13 extreme poverty. Violence; we face extreme violence. 14 These are things that I myself have personally experienced 15 and I have no doubt that most Métis women have as well. 16 Sexual assault; it's a significant issue. We face The ability 17 to care for our children is a significant issue. 18 ability to be heard, for someone to listen to us, is a 19 significant issue. 20 The I woke up to a dream this morning and 21 this touches a little bit on children. 22 children. 23 experiencing an identity crisis. I have my own My daughter is 17 and she's currently She's not sure where StenoTran 340 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 she fits. There is nothing in the school system for her. 2 When she was learning about history, she learned that 3 the Métis people gave up their script because they were 4 drunks. 5 horrified. 6 schoolteacher, who I thought should have known more at 7 this point in time. That was taught in the curriculum and I was I had to raise the issue with the 8 9 This is 1994. This is shameful. My daughter learns more about Indian ways than she does about anything else and this confuses 10 her badly, too. She doesn't know if her greatest 11 aspiration is to be a wise old Indian woman or a wise old 12 Métis woman because she is not sure where she fits. 13 have many nieces, little ones to big ones, and all of my 14 sisters -- I have many sisters -- are working full time 15 and attempting to care for their children at the same time. I 16 17 The reason I mention the dream is because 18 I woke up this morning to a dream and in this dream I was 19 a caretaker for children and I was waiting for these two 20 little kids to come. 21 a little boy and a little girl. They were two little Métis kids, 22 I got up in the morning and the children 23 weren't there, they hadn't come, so I waited for half an StenoTran 341 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 hour and all of a sudden the little girl showed up outside 2 my door and she was crying. 3 why are you crying, and where is your little brother?" 4 She said, "My brother is in a crisis centre. 5 there last night and I don't know how to get him and I 6 don't know where my Mom is and I don't know where my Dad 7 is." 8 9 I said, "What's the matter, He was left I think that speaks to just some of the issues that Métis women and children face. I don't think 10 this is news to the Commission, I don't think this is news 11 to anybody. 12 I hate to answer all of these questions. 13 I wish there were other Métis women, and perhaps there 14 are, but I would like to take a stab at the third question. 15 I can't answer Question 2 because I will just get sarcastic 16 and that's not appropriate. 17 What steps should be taken to ensure the 18 active participation of Métis women and youth -- and I'm 19 not sure, are there any youth here today; I don't think 20 so -- in self-government structures? 21 children and no money and we can't be heard, I think it's 22 real easy. 23 be involved, make sure that we can have the day care that Well, if we have You just make sure that we have the money to StenoTran 342 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 we need to be involved, and make sure that when we are 2 involved we are heard. 3 Who is responsible for taking those 4 steps? I would suggest our male leaders are responsible 5 for taking those steps. 6 trying. 7 The women are trying, have been How do I think the Commission could be 8 most helpful? I'm hesitant to say that the Commission 9 can do anything that would enable the male Métis leaders 10 to listen to us and to include us. I'm not sure that the 11 Commission can do something like that and I don't think 12 it's appropriate for the Commission to make that kind of 13 a recommendation, either, because as a self-governing 14 people we have our own house that we have to clean up. 15 What the Commission could do, however, 16 is send some instructions to government bodies about the 17 appropriateness of funding allocations that the government 18 gives out when it comes to listening to the views of Métis 19 people, which predominantly are Métis women who are mostly 20 never seen or heard. 21 I perhaps think that there is some 22 responsibility on the people who are making funding 23 decisions to ensure that when organizations -- and I'm StenoTran 343 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 not talking government structures, but I am talking about 2 organizations who are moving towards developing government 3 structures -- are receiving money for a purpose, one of 4 those purposes being to ensure that women's voices are 5 being heard in the development. 6 to do on the government's part. 7 8 That's a simple thing I don't think I have much else to say. Thank you. 9 ANNE ACCO: 10 translation). 11 of corralled, of course, so 12 somewhere in this group. (Native language spoken-no The questions that are before us are kind 13 there must be a cowboy The major issues for Métis women are, 14 one, the whole thing has to become inclusive. 15 be exclusive of. 16 have lived 18 years in Quebec, I have lived abroad, and 17 what I see is an entirely racist, absolutely devoted to 18 -- governments that are absolutely devoted to hanging on 19 to every bit of control, even as they are going down. 20 They will diffuse us, confuse us, miscue us, and we all 21 have to be aware of that. 22 23 It cannot I will be 54 years old this year. I I am a critic of the Commission, not because I choose it but because I am a writer. StenoTran The reason 344 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 why I choose to be a writer is because I come from a people 2 who are the keepers of the words, keepers of the words 3 of the Cree language. 4 formal Aboriginal common law process. 5 as early as 1892 in my community. 6 grandmother lost all her land in three places, struck off. 7 We were landless. 8 The Cree language allows us logical, We were denied that In one day my great That's the area I come from. My father was Pierre Carrière. When he 9 was doing Métis work, he used to travel with two dollars 10 on the railway to go to Regina, to lobby for everything 11 that a peoples needed. 12 visited every Aboriginal person over 100 years, especially 13 on the Prairies, these were measures that were taken. 14 Whether they were taken by one person, there was always 15 the privy council there and there was always a prime 16 minister willing to come forward and sign the process or 17 the procedure or whatever you want. 18 The cultural genocide that has We are speaking from oppression and we 19 are addressing the tools of oppression. 20 all. 21 its ass and look at the cultural genocide and begin to 22 be respectable. 23 We can list them What the government has to do is literally get off We are a G7 nation, we are part of NATO. We are part of NATO because we ripped off the Innu, we StenoTran 345 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 are part of the G7 nation because we had oil. 2 off the Northwest Territories. 3 We ripped May I go on? What we have to do, then -- why is there 4 a question that the Métis women have to be involved? Are 5 they not involved? 6 involved. 7 level or -- let me tell you something, my throwbacks are 8 Métis. 9 "Oops, see the Métis." At the clan level, we are always What we are not involved with is the tribal I have six children, but I look at them and I say, 10 I am a mixed blood. When we go back and say, "Number 2 should 11 have never been asked", you should assume the work was 12 already done at the grassroots level and at the community 13 level. 14 through a big grapevine, the Métis women from Saskatchewan 15 were wondering why they were not part of this. 16 like to know the technical process by which they were not 17 involved. I am here today because, apparently, I heard 18 I would That's the critical part. The other part, what steps should be 19 taken to ensure the active participation of youth, elders 20 and women in Métis self-government structures, you must 21 put money where your mouth is. 22 in this process or you are just diddling or you are playing 23 the fiddle. Either you don't believe I don't know what's going on. StenoTran 346 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 This question; there should be active 2 participation with cash. 3 are done with layers of white reports that were done before 4 and all the information is gleaned from there. 5 the Commission is accepting these as bona fide research 6 work or there is not a control mechanism within the 7 Commission to see that people are doing their field 8 research. 9 10 Some of the reports I am seeing Either Field research is paramount in this process. Elders? Of course, they have to be involved. 11 Self-government structures. 12 Self-government structures start with the grassroots. 13 In 1948, James Brady did what I call the one-on-one 14 education. 15 man and the woman of the house. 16 education we need right now. 17 distinction in the kind of information men or women get. 18 19 20 He came into our communities, he educated the This is the kind of There should be no We have to "ungenderfy" our information. Each must know what is happening in the other's camp. The Commission can be most helpful by 21 absolutely being honest about their role. 22 part of a co-opted information train with the federal 23 government pulling all kinds of invisible strings, because StenoTran Are they being 347 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 this can happen when you are getting to the point where 2 you are really burnt out. 3 being burnt out? 4 hearing. 5 Have you taken the time to stop These are terrible things you have been You must go on in this process to be 6 responsive at the grassroots level and I think you have 7 been to some point, but something has gone wrong. 8 Native researchers, at some point, we are going to find 9 that out because the truth rises and you don't want to 10 be embarrassed by ever having been on this Commission. 11 Thank you very much. 12 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 13 As (Native language spoken-no translation). 14 Go ahead. 15 GREG SCHOFIELD: Before I turn my chair 16 over to the Métis women that have just shown up here, which 17 I am really grateful for, I just want to highlight a few 18 points. 19 I know that this discussion is dedicated 20 to the Métis women in the room, but before I turn my chair 21 over to Bernice, I would just like to add simply that, 22 as a Métis man -- and I hope that this would be endorsed 23 by every Métis man in this room -- we seem to forget that StenoTran 348 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 our historical nation has been built by our foremothers 2 and our grandmothers, that they have retained the language, 3 they have retained the stories and the culture of our 4 people, and without them we would be nationless. 5 be cultureless, we would be languageless. 6 be a distinct nation of people. We would not 7 I just wanted to say that. 8 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 9 We would Thank you. I welcome the Métis women to the table. 10 Go ahead, Marge. 11 MARGE FREIDEL, President, National 12 Métis Women of Canada: I apologize to everyone here for 13 being late for this part of the consultation. 14 really that I am boycotting that we only get to speak for 15 one hour and 15 minutes in this whole two days, we are 16 also in a consultation with the Department of Justice going 17 on at the same time this meeting was. 18 unfortunate that they both had to be at the same time, 19 but we are part of that delegation as well. 20 that you saw here yesterday are all at that consultation 21 and they won't be here today. It's not It was very, very The women 22 I think that I, first of all, want to 23 dwell upon the things that have gone on within the Métis StenoTran 349 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 community, where, for a very, very long time, the Métis 2 women's voices have been silent. 3 blaming anyone else, but sometimes, because of the 4 oppression that Métis women have faced for a long, long 5 time, they have not been able to speak and because of the 6 dysfunctions that are in the communities, it seems that 7 it affects the women a lot more. 8 oppression that all of our people have been through seems 9 to impact more on women and women are not always able to 10 I'm not necessarily The effects of the speak of all these things. 11 As I said yesterday, it is my belief 12 that, first of all, women must be at the table for any 13 discussions on self-government. 14 table for any of the problems because we are part and parcel 15 of the whole community. 16 the nurturers, we bring life to the next generations, and 17 I think it's time that women got up from where they are, 18 from the violence that they face, from the place in our 19 communities that they have, and it's time that they started 20 to speak. 21 They have to be at the We are the care-givers, we are But, more importantly, I think that 22 everyone else has to show respect to these women and start 23 to listen. They might say some things that we don't agree StenoTran 350 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 with or that we don't like to hear -- it's not that we 2 don't agree with them, but we might not like to hear it 3 -- but I think that they are things that need to be said. 4 We need healing, not only for the women 5 but the whole entire community needs to be healed from 6 some of these dysfunctions that go on, and we need to be 7 at the table so that our voices can be heard and that you 8 listen because we will help solve the problems. 9 we can do these things. Together 10 If we are going to be on opposing ends, 11 then most of our time will be spent in a conflict, rather 12 than working together because what we do today is going 13 to reflect upon my children, your children, my 14 grandchildren and your grandchildren. 15 future Métis people and we don't really want things to 16 continue on in the way that they have over the last century. 17 So, we have to start somewhere and we have to start working 18 19 20 21 These are the together. I will let Bernice talk about some of the things that are going on in the communities. MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Just before 22 you go on, I would remind you that we have some guiding 23 questions that our Commissioners are quite interested in StenoTran 351 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 hearing from Métis women with respect to self-government 2 and all of the process, but I also wanted to add that, 3 in my experience working at the Commission, the women's 4 team, I think, still is looking for more input and more 5 direction and more from Métis women. 6 We are lacking some in that area, if you 7 could provide and maybe keep in the back of your mind some 8 of the other points of the Commission's mandate. 9 you have anything that you want to add to any of those So, if 10 points of the mandate that are solution-oriented and that 11 will provide information from a Métis woman's perspective, 12 I would invite you to also do that so that it will be more 13 food for thought for the Commissioners. 14 Thanks. 15 BERNICE HAMMERSMITH: Good morning. I 16 apologize as well. 17 this morning. 18 afternoon. 19 of the day they might be able to interject at different 20 parts to discuss the things with you. 21 We have been at a different meeting Some of the women are coming over here this They were under the understanding that part I just want to tell you about our 22 experience yesterday. They left here with a bit of disgust 23 yesterday -- the Métis women, that is -- because two things StenoTran 352 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 happened here yesterday. 2 to get the attention of the Chair and many times didn't 3 and had to use whoever was beside them to do that. 4 They said that they were trying So, they said they would not 5 participate again at that level, basically because at least 6 three of them never got acknowledged yesterday and, second, 7 it was just a slap in our face not to even get invited 8 for supper after we thought we had participated in your 9 consultation. Our Métis tradition is we feed our people 10 before we ask them to do anything for us, seeing as they 11 are our visitors, and we thought we were yours, seeing 12 as you are situated out of here. 13 In any case, after having looked at this 14 booklet that you gave us yesterday, which only one of us 15 got, by the way, and we were asked to seriously look at 16 these four questions. 17 document because only one of us was registered, as you 18 said, when we asked to stay and eat with you because lots 19 of things get happening when you eat with people, a 20 different level of communication. 21 Only one of us got the actual In any case, after looking at these 22 issues, this one in particular, "What are the major issues 23 for Métis women, youth and Elders in your communities", StenoTran 353 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 first of all, I think there is a big assumption here that 2 these are all connected issues. 3 elders in our communities are males -- I'm not saying they 4 are not good because they are males -- and youth is another 5 issue as well. 6 old ones, however we have issues that are related to women 7 as well, specifically to women. 8 9 10 I know that many of the Maybe we talk about our children and our We argued yesterday that we could probably talk on all issues regarding the Métis nation. However, there are some that are specific to us. So, 11 I only beg that when you ask us questions, they be related 12 to the issues that -- we may include youth, we may include 13 elders, we also include a definition of who is a Métis 14 and many other things like land and resources that we want 15 to discuss. 16 One of the things that maybe is a major 17 issue for many of our women is the fact that we have little 18 or no input into the structure of our organizations; no 19 input. 20 that we do want a place there to speak, many times are 21 asked, first of all, as in your situation -- and one of 22 them complained a lot yesterday that when we want to have 23 our voices finally heard -- and Marge is correct about As a matter of fact, many of us, when we decide StenoTran 354 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 not being able to have that accessibility before purely 2 because of finances. 3 Your Commission has a set of guidelines 4 that have been established for the last three years or 5 however long it was, which none of us fit in that criteria 6 because our organizations have never had a women component 7 in it. 8 which was men. It basically was representative of the nation, 9 Good for them that they all got elected. 10 However, we were only being represented through the Native 11 Women of Canada up to a short while ago and through the 12 Native Women of Canada we became more an auxiliary group, 13 an auxiliary group that would maybe make some reaction 14 to each of our nations, whether it be AFN or FSIN in our 15 communities, and then we would make our plight to them. 16 17 As a group of women -- and it could be 18 Métis, it could be Treaty, it could be Inuit, it could 19 be even Polynesian in some cases have come to our tables 20 and said, "We are not being treated fairly." 21 and make some initiation to talk to the different groups 22 of people that we felt were responsible for some of the 23 issues that the women brought up. StenoTran So, we go 355 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 However, they were under no obligation 2 to listen to us. 3 with the community people at the community level to 4 basically organize them to attack our own nations because 5 that is where we felt that we were not being treated 6 properly. 7 So, we felt that we should maybe work It was good that we could get Treaty 8 women to help us or Inuit women to come and help us, but 9 mostly they were shut out. Not only were we shut out in 10 those rooms as Métis women and part of our nations, but 11 they shut out other women because they were Treaty or 12 because they were some other category of government that 13 would not allow them into the room. 14 That happened when we went with them to 15 NYAC, with NYAC women, and said that we were not being 16 heard in our different nations. 17 come there because we are Métis." 18 and on and on. They said, "Well, we can't The excuses went on That's an issue for us, a very major issue. 19 We, during the constitutional talks, 20 decided that we would work and try to work within our 21 nation. 22 we will support the Native women's stand that they are 23 not having a position at the table. As Marge was saying earlier, we even said, "Fine, StenoTran However, we will agree 356 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 that ours, at least in the Métis nation, has our input", 2 and it had, to some degree. 3 It was a battle of ourselves just being 4 able to get into the room and to discuss that and be able 5 to say that, yes, we felt that our issues were going to 6 be addressed by this group of people at the national level. 7 However, many women still did not feel that that was 8 adequate and stayed with the Native Women of Canada and 9 continued on with making that issue a bigger one and taking 10 it to court. 11 How are Métis women involved in and 12 represented in decision-making at the community level? 13 As far as I can tell in our communities in Saskatchewan, 14 the leaders are the women. 15 our locals, they are the secretaries of our locals, they 16 are treasurers of our locals, they are the community 17 liaison people in our locals. 18 communities. 19 their representative for that area are males. 20 They are the Presidents of The women are running the However, their superiors are all males or I didn't come here to bash men. That's 21 not our issue. What we were trying to say and what we 22 have been trying to say for many years is that we need 23 a place there with them. Not necessarily to move them StenoTran 357 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 over and say, "You have less authority than you have now 2 because we have come to share it with you"; no, basically 3 we have come to listen. 4 us have even felt: 5 to represent us when what they do beyond our borders of 6 our communities is not what we said that we would like 7 done in our communities? At the community level many of Why are we asking this group of people 8 For example, this particular discussion 9 we are having here was discussed in La Ronge, in a northern 10 community on the east side of our province. 11 discussions were going on of what to do about 12 self-government, how do we determine that, and what do 13 we do with our self-governing structures that are already 14 in place and that are already being run by community people 15 and now the government is going to take those funds and 16 give them to our parent organizations and how do we go 17 about making sure that the community representatives that 18 were initially there stay there because there will be 19 re-appointments of different kinds once a particular 20 program is being given from a federally or provincially-run 21 administration to us at the community level under our Métis 22 nations, many of us felt that there needed to be some 23 further consultation on that. StenoTran While the 358 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 As we spoke, one of our women -- and her 2 name is Elaine Ducharme -- was brutally murdered in La 3 Ronge, brutally murdered. 4 an investigation, there hasn't even been one sentence come 5 out of the Métis nation of Saskatchewan about this woman. 6 She is a Métis woman. To this day, there has not been That's just an example of how 7 inactive our leaderships are about the things that are 8 going on in our communities. 9 We have our children that are committing 10 suicide and doing very many serious things to themselves. 11 When we go to speak at forums like this, we talk about 12 land and we talk about forestry and how we can get our 13 contracts in and that they should listen to us, seeing 14 as we are the residents of the forest they are ripping 15 off. 16 of any kind of political forum that we attend. 17 becomes an issue is the kind of troublemakers we are. That's not what gets used as an issue at the beginning 18 What We found out too long ago that there is 19 just too much, I suppose, cooperation going on between 20 these big multi-corporations, plus the band councils, plus 21 our Métis, all involved somehow in something called 22 co-management. 23 address the issues that we have talked about, which is The co-management says that they then not StenoTran 359 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 our forest, which is our water, which is our rocks, which 2 is uranium, in our communities. 3 talked about because we are involved in co-management. 4 Those things don't get So, for two years we sit -- and none of 5 us sit there. It's co-management only appointed by the 6 leadership. 7 it is us -- that is, women -- that are laying across the 8 highways and saying, "Stop this development until you 9 rethink what's going on in our communities", and to our That's who co-management becomes, although 10 trappers. They have taken pregnant women off our streets 11 and put them in the bus and put them in jail. 12 happen without us noticing it. 13 That doesn't So, this Commission -- it says here, "How 14 can it be helpful?" 15 was not very helpful. 16 I agree, but I figure we have seen you in every corner 17 of our province probably, so I don't think we are much 18 of a threat. 19 Well, the way you treated us yesterday We came here, we were uninvited, As well, this Commission, in our view, 20 has sat and we have given you what we thought was our 21 evidence of how we felt we were being mistreated, not only 22 at the hands of our leaders but also at the hands of those 23 corporations and also now Indian-run businesses where they StenoTran 360 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 are ripping our Métis women out of those jobs that they 2 have had in our northern communities and giving those 3 contracts to Treaty people and those Treaty people then, 4 in turn, hire other Treaty people. 5 Métis women on the west side of our province are unemployed. The majority of our 6 7 Those are the issues that are important 8 to us. Employment is important to us and being able to 9 see some benefits of the resource that we see walking 10 through our trees or driving through our communities with 11 loads of trucks full of our lumber, and we can't get a 12 voice at the community -- I mean at the provincial level 13 where these issues are being addressed. 14 In one instance, in the Canoe Lake 15 blockage we had huge scores of RCMP come there with 16 unbelievable arms because our women had laid themselves 17 across the highway and said, "You have to stop their 18 cutting." 19 "Co-management is the way to go." 20 is a cop out and it's high time for people to sit and 21 contemplate on how much more forest they can rip off in 22 the two years they are in co-management. 23 Our leadership did nothing, except say, I believe co-management Many times we have made some StenoTran 361 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 presentations at the community level. 2 I think I have seen all of you and we asked if we could 3 make some kind of -- I think we presented you with a plan 4 at that time of how we thought we could try to be a model 5 community, for you to watch us to see if we could do that, 6 if we as Treaty people or Métis people or non-Aboriginal 7 people come to a community and function and determine for 8 ourselves under which jurisdiction we would be able to 9 work together. 10 is community. At Île a la Crosse We continue to do that and that, to us, That is self-government for us. 11 We talked to Mr. Ratz (ph), who seems 12 to represent the Treaty people in our community, and say, 13 "Just what is it in the federal jurisdiction that you have 14 that you and I could work together as a Métis woman", the 15 President at that time was a Métis woman of that community, 16 "and how can we work together? 17 teachers and the RCMP and the doctors and whoever else 18 is non-Aboriginal in our community?" 19 How can we work with the We can make some impact far more than 20 two kilometres around our communities because under 21 municipalities that's all we seem to be able to do. 22 have a structure there that's not very adequately 23 culturally sensitive for us. StenoTran We 362 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 We can run for positions there at the 2 community level. However, their jurisdiction is only a 3 two-mile radius and we are not to make issues on land. 4 Everywhere we go the agenda has been cut to the issues 5 that we think are important and that, we also believe, 6 a lot of you should look at in relation to us, especially 7 violence against women, and also our children. 8 What steps should be taken to ensure the 9 active participation of youth, elders and women in Métis 10 self-government structures? Well, I guess we could argue 11 affirmative action. 12 that, many of our boardrooms say, "Well, if you want to 13 have a position here, put your name on a ballot." 14 have even said that to our elders, "You have no place here 15 until you put your name on a ballot, you have no power." 16 That, to me, is a deplorable way to try to build anything. 17 So, I guess to the degree where we have 18 not been able to get into those circles where apparently 19 your group of people, as well as other groups of people, 20 federal or provincial, recognize that as a place where 21 things are happening, where I think they need to look is 22 beyond that, beyond the structure of the politics, because 23 I think the politicians are trying to catch up with the However, every time we have asked StenoTran They 363 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 community at this point, many times, and you have to go 2 to the communities. 3 will be able to speak. 4 Those are the people that I think One of the things you have to consider 5 is this appointment structure. Who have you sent out one 6 of your field workers to say who can participate at this? 7 I know that in our communities many of them have to go 8 through another person before they can speak to you and 9 get on the agenda and that particular person is sometimes 10 not very sensitive to our issues because they are usually 11 appointed by the male-dominated political group in that 12 community, whether it be the Treaties or Métis. 13 So, consequently, any time that any of 14 us have to come here to say to you, "This is the message 15 we would like you to send for us on our behalf", we sometimes 16 think they have been told bad things about us. 17 even sure why we get this very negative feeling. I'm not 18 Maybe you have not heard a woman before 19 in your circles, I don't know, but it's not a very healthy 20 way to ask for our participation, although many times we 21 have said we are not going to wait for an invitation, we 22 will get someone to ask for one for us. 23 a little bolder now that maybe your term is over. StenoTran We are getting I'm 364 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 not sure how much longer you will be before you tell us 2 what the nation is saying. 3 The other concern we have is just exactly 4 what is it that you will be writing on our behalf as Métis 5 women, because in every one of our provinces, as I said 6 yesterday, we are in trouble. 7 office by another group of women. 8 another group of women would not say what we are saying 9 maybe more carefully; however, they would be saying it. 10 I can't believe them not saying it although they are 11 We have been removed from I'm not saying that appointed. 12 The issues don't go away purely because 13 you have changed women. 14 dramatic, but they will still be there. 15 anyone could sit there and not recognize that our women, 16 such as Elaine Ducharme, are murdered and no one says 17 anything. 18 It may get a little bit less I can't believe So, I think that the Commission itself 19 would be far more advantageous by reaching out to the 20 community people, even in the impact area you are going 21 to visit, if that could be possible. 22 have done that in some cases. 23 under the structure. I realize that you However, again it's all I know that you have to respect that StenoTran 365 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 and many times that's the excuse I get. 2 If I ask for information in regards to 3 the Royal Commission or any other kind of different 4 activities that are going on in our areas, I am told that 5 I have to ask another individual, that they are the one 6 in charge of it and that they would be the ones that would 7 determine what's going to go on as a community 8 consultation. 9 involved, especially the women. 10 I don't see community people being I see community people, but mostly they are males. 11 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: If I could 12 just interject. I know that I have had a couple of hands 13 go up around the table and I would like to have an 14 opportunity for some of the delegates to speak as well. 15 BERNICE HAMMERSMITH: 16 getting done the questions, anyway. 17 some of them. I was just I was trying to answer That's fine, go ahead. 18 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Frank? 19 FRANK PALMATER, President, New 20 Brunswick Aboriginal Peoples Council: 21 interrupt a woman when the conversation that we are on 22 is particular to Native women, Métis women. 23 have been recognized and I first must make my apologies StenoTran I really hate to However, I 366 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 to the Commissioners for being here late this morning. 2 I found out that my Vice-President's 3 mother passed away and when he found that out, he called 4 to make arrangements to go to the funeral and found out 5 that his wife's father passed away, within 15 minutes of 6 each other. 7 arrangements. 8 Commissioners. 9 So, I had to stay up in my room and make some So, I apologize for being late to the In attempting to answer the questions 10 back home in the community, I asked if it would be 11 appropriate for me to be here answering concerns about 12 Métis women in some of these questions. 13 of who we are in the province of New Brunswick goes similar 14 to this. 15 A history lesson We have 22 locals in the province. 16 Seventy-nine per cent of our locals have an executive that 17 is structured President, Vice-President, Secretary; 79 18 per cent are women. 19 65 per cent are women. 20 Of our Board of Directors, 12 zones, We received some finances from Privy 21 Council Office to engage in self-government discussions. 22 The Self-Government Steering Committee in the province 23 of New Brunswick was hand-picked. StenoTran I hand-picked them. 367 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 There are five women and five men; equal representation 2 on that committee. 3 In New Brunswick we have refused, and 4 we will continue refusing, to allow governments or anyone 5 else to split us by saying that our women are 6 status/non-status Métis and they participate at those 7 levels when it has a reflection on them. 8 "Frank, you are our elected leader and you will go to Ottawa 9 and, as best as you possibly can, answer these questions, 10 The women said, not as a women but as an elected leader." 11 Your first question says: What are the 12 major issues? 13 back home feel -- and I tend to agree with them -- that 14 there are three things lacking, Native leaders and 15 non-Native leaders, in the way they deal with women, and 16 that is respect, dignity and honesty. 17 me to make sure that the Commissioners were very well aware 18 that if all women, all youth, all elders, all men, all 19 Aboriginal people are treated with respect, dignity and 20 honesty, there would be no need for special consultations. 21 22 23 It's not so much an issue as what the women The women wanted But that isn't happening. I have witnessed over the last day or so women who are here, who say they are left out. StenoTran In New 368 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Brunswick I like to think that that's not happening. 2 is no doubt that women would come in from New Brunswick 3 and say, "Oh, he's full of poop, he is not speaking the 4 truth. 5 to exclude anyone. 6 for everyone to participate, if they choose to participate. We are left out." 7 There Our process doesn't allow us It isn't a perfect process, but allows One of the recommendations from New 8 Brunswick was that whatever the Commission recommends to 9 the government, make sure that it is inclusive and not 10 exclusive. Allow for structures for participation. 11 it equal, does it have to be equal; no. Is 12 I don't know why more women are not at 13 the table to speak on Métis issues with respect to women. 14 I didn't set it up, I'm not responsible for it. I was 15 asked to be here. I consulted with the community groups 16 before I came and they said, "You are our elected leader 17 and you will go and do what you were elected to do, and 18 that is to represent the people in the province of New 19 Brunswick." 20 Something that a lot of people forget 21 -- and my grandmother used to joke about it all the time 22 -- is that women were the centre of Aboriginal communities 23 prior to European contact. We were a matriarchal society, StenoTran 369 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 at least we were in the east. 2 in the west and a couple of times I have been told at other 3 meetings, "Don't you tell us how it was out here. 4 don't know, you weren't here. 5 first." 6 I'm not so sure how it went You Know your own history So, I am basically sticking to the east. In the east we were a matriarchal 7 society. When a man was accepted as a provider for a women, 8 he went to her family and assumed her matriarchal tree. 9 She didn't go to his, as we do in the European culture, 10 and assume his name; it was the reverse. My grandmother 11 always told me that women are the givers of life. 12 have a very small part to play, some men smaller than 13 others. Men That's the words of my grandmother. 14 If we forget where we came from, if we 15 forget the role that women play in our lives, we do them 16 an injustice and a disservice. 17 upset and do they have a right to be? 18 issues that deal with women are that we don't treat them 19 with respect or dignity and honesty and in New Brunswick 20 they have been asking that when we do speak for them or 21 on their behalf or with them, that we treat them with 22 honesty. 23 Don't lie. Are they mad and are they Yes. Why? There is no need. StenoTran The They are 370 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Aboriginal people. 2 some of us. 3 slough it off. They just look a little better than Don't lie. If they have a problem, don't 4 How can the Commission be most helpful? 5 Don't allow self-government processes, don't allow the 6 government, through your recommendations to the 7 government, to split us even further, "Well, geez, we will 8 only deal with that because it's a Métis woman's issue 9 or we will only deal with that because it's a non-status 10 Micmac woman's issue." Women are the nurturers of all 11 life. 12 "Mother Earth" because it was set up to provide life, to 13 sustain itself. The earth is referred to in Aboriginal culture as Women were set up for that purpose. 14 Would it be wrong for us to ignore them, 15 to treat them any less than we want to be treated as men? 16 I won't. I have a wife who refuses to allow me to do 17 that. 18 recommendations to the government, you could include those 19 three words, that women must be treated with dignity, 20 respect and, above all, honesty. 21 I don't have all the answers, but if, in your I feel strange sometimes as a man 22 speaking on women's issues, but I am elected. 23 political leader, I am elected and 79 to 80 per cent of StenoTran I am a 371 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 the assembly that elected me were women. So, I am told 2 to come here to meetings like this and speak on their 3 behalf. I wish I had some of my board here with me. 4 An example: The Vice-President of our 5 Economic Development Corporation is a woman. 6 telephone conference call last night at 6:00 o'clock, 7:00 7 o'clock in New Brunswick, 7:30 in Newfoundland. 8 know what time in Labrador. 9 10 BERNIE HEARD: We had a I don't The same in New Brunswick. 11 FRANK PALMATER: As we do, we get caught 12 up in technicalities and I was just trying to inform the 13 Board about what we were doing in our latest acquisition. 14 We are trying to buy a park from the province of New 15 Brunswick and we want to make it into a tourism mecca 16 because just up the road there is a village, post-European 17 contact. 18 white people used to be like before they got electricity, 19 guns, cars, stuff like that. 20 the road is an add-on. 21 pre-European Aboriginal village", and this land became 22 available. 23 It's called King's Landing and it's what the We thought, "Gee, just down Wouldn't it be nice to see a So, we made an offer and I'm real glad StenoTran 372 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 that the President of the Corporation is a woman and I'm 2 real glad she was available to sit on the Board last night 3 because she said, "Frank, have our lawyers checked out 4 the offer?" 5 up." 6 offer that allows us, if our lawyer is not satisfied, to 7 pull out?" 8 before we send the offer back", which is good. 9 should know what is and what is not a good deal for us. 10 I said, "Oh, yes, they helped us write it She said, "Did we include an escape clause in our I said "no". I didn't think of that. She said, "Well, put one in I thought all the t's were crossed 11 and the i's were dotted and they weren't. 12 glad that she was there. 13 Our lawyer So, I was very In New Brunswick I cannot be responsible 14 for what happens in the west. 15 for what happens in P.E.I. or Nova Scotia or Labrador. 16 But as an Aboriginal person, as a leader, I can be 17 responsible for, and I am responsible for, what happens 18 in the province of New Brunswick and we refuse to neglect 19 our women, our youth and our elders. 20 today the way we can best preserve our culture, by using 21 those three individuals, women, youth and elders. 22 23 I cannot be responsible They were and are Unfortunately, a lot of Aboriginal leaders -- and I have been accused of it in the past -- StenoTran 373 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 use, "Well, we don't have any money to involve them." 2 Well, find money. 3 development opportunities, you find money for 4 self-government discussions, why can't you find money to 5 involve people, women, youth and elders. 6 You find money for economical I feel bad that we don't have a special 7 forum here for elders, to ask questions about elders, 8 because with our elders is the wisdom and the knowledge 9 of what happened in the past. 10 What a resource that we are ignoring in this forum. 11 12 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: If I could interject, please? 13 14 Man, oh man, what a resource! FRANK PALMATER: Yes. I'm just about done, anyway. 15 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Good, because 16 we have three more speakers and they want to break for 17 lunch. 18 FRANK PALMATER: My recommendation to 19 the Commission on this is whatever recommendations you 20 make to the government, make sure that all Aboriginal 21 people are inclusive and that the systems you recommend 22 be set up for Aboriginal people will include all Aboriginal 23 people. Don't allow them to split us. StenoTran We have refused 374 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 to allow that in the province of New Brunswick, I hope 2 you refuse to allow the government to direct you that way. 3 Thank you. 4 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 5 Frank. 6 Mary? 7 COMMISSIONER MARY SILLETT: 8 Thank you, K.C. Thank you, I have to be fast, I know. 9 I would like to, first of all, apologize 10 to Bernice and the women if you felt, for any reason, that 11 any action taken here was meant to exclude you because 12 I really think that there was no ill-intention meant. 13 I apologize if there is any hurt feelings as a result of 14 this process. 15 I would also like to thank you for coming 16 back despite the frustration that you felt because I think 17 in the line of work that you do and the line of work that 18 we do and the line of work that we did before we came to 19 the Commission it's like that. 20 frustrating to try to make changes and sometimes you become 21 very, very discouraged and change takes a long time. 22 23 It's very, very I do know that in our hearings some of the issues that we dealt with were more sensitive than StenoTran 375 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 others. In fact there were issues that were so sensitive 2 that particularly Aboriginal women would not speak about 3 those issues publicly. 4 sessions and we accommodated those requests. 5 gone through that experience, I often wonder to myself 6 the violence that women feel, the oppression or the 7 powerlessness. 8 somewhere. 9 They asked us for many in camera After having Certainly, goodness, that must stop We heard earlier this morning that it's 10 not for the Royal Commission, for example, to be 11 prescriptive. 12 to tell male leaders that they should not be doing what 13 they are doing to the people in their communities and I 14 think that's right. 15 our control, but if anyone has any ideas as to what a 16 Commission like us can do to be helpful in this area without 17 being prescriptive, I would really appreciate that. It's not for us to make recommendations I think that, really, that's beyond 18 Thank you. 19 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 20 Mary. 21 Kirby? 22 KIRBY LETHBRIDGE: 23 Thank you, I would like to quickly just touch on the questions and I have a short StenoTran 376 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 comment I would like to make. 2 and to the other women as well. 3 time. 4 Again I apologize to Bernice I won't take too much I, as well, feel uncomfortable speaking 5 on behalf of women. 6 I do have a daughter and I have a mother. 7 healing is the most important thing to women, that men 8 heal of certain flaws that were in our make-up because 9 of an imposition of fundamentally flawed concepts/views 10 toward women. 11 I am not an elected person. However, I think that Healing. I would like to add that five of our 12 Board, which represents the Métis Association, are women 13 from our coastal communities. 14 from just about every of the major communities on the south 15 coast. 16 Actually, we have women Looking into self-government 17 institutions, how can we guarantee that women are going 18 to be properly represented, elders, youth. 19 constitutional requirement could be developed which would 20 guarantee an agreed level of participation. 21 build anything successfully, you have to have a level 22 foundation. 23 will have a crooked house and you won't be able to build Possibly some I think to If you build on a crooked foundation, you StenoTran 377 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 very high before it falls over. 2 When I was a child, up through my youth 3 and into a marriage, which fell apart because I really 4 didn't know very much, I came to recognize a process there, 5 which I think I was taught unbeknownst to me. 6 it was taught unconsciously. I think I don't know how to say that. 7 8 9 I think people weren't aware of what was being taught, what was being passed on. I had a very flawed 10 view of the role of women and I have come to recognize 11 that it is a learned behaviour. 12 being very important. 13 This is where I see healing I have started to heal in many ways and 14 it's a wonderful thing. I was a very self-serving, 15 self-gratifying person, and I apologize to women today. 16 Much of the misery and the hurt that's been in my life 17 was brought on by sort of a domino effect through the 18 generations. 19 that I have seen women treated, the things that I have 20 heard said and the things that I have said. 21 It's very sad sometimes to think of the way It's really hard for anyone to change 22 and to do that we need support. I hate the words 23 "institution" and "mechanism", but I think it's required StenoTran 378 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 that we have access based on the principle of equity of 2 access -- which is agreed to, the consensus report in the 3 Charlottetown Accord -- to certain programs. 4 I think the most important one is the 5 development of cultural institutions, cultural centres 6 across this country, where women can come and participate, 7 where men can come and participate, where children can 8 participate, where the teachers in the school can go and 9 learn, where people in the social welfare system can come 10 11 and learn, where I can go and learn about concept. I know that there are mechanisms in the 12 federal system that provide certain services to First 13 Nations; not to all First Nations, either. 14 to me that it's just a token way of addressing a problem 15 to say, "We spend X number of dollars on certain things." 16 So, I think that a recommendation that 17 the Commission could make to the government is that this 18 principle of equity of access be applied to our concept 19 of community development. 20 I believe is healing, the healing of individuals and 21 families, repatriation to identity. So, it seems As I said, the number one thing 22 The difference for me expressing myself 23 as an Aboriginal person is this, that I either have a time StenoTran 379 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 line and relationship to the land this long or I have one 2 at least this long. 3 not from European men. 4 back to some of the things Frank talked about, and Bernice. 5 It's being brave enough to address myself, to look at 6 That relationship came from women, So, for me to heal means getting myself. 7 I know that institutions are not really 8 going to really be the mechanisms -- I hate that -- that 9 you cannot legislate change, you cannot make institutions 10 that will guarantee change, but certainly there are people 11 and women, being the most important of those people, and 12 our children. 13 access to these institutions whereby we can start the 14 change, a change based on healing. 15 They are the people who should be guaranteed MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you 17 I have one last speaker. Réjan? 18 RÉJAN PILOTE: 16 very much. Je ne ferai pas une 19 grosse intervention. Je veux dire que je porte un très 20 grand respect à mes grands-mères, à ma mère, aux femmes 21 et aux filles qui forment le peuple métis. 22 quand on est ici et on parle de gouvernement métis, on 23 parle aussi de constitution, et je crois que la StenoTran Je pense que 380 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 constitution du peuple métis, nous l'avons ici devant nous, 2 notre constitution. 3 du drapeau, on voit le signe de l'infini, où les femmes 4 sont à l'origine de tout; on voit que c'est deux entités 5 qui sont réunies, l'homme et la femme, et on voit que 6 l'homme et la femme sont égaux. 7 de dire qui est la femme et qui est l'homme. 8 9 On parle du drapeau, et quand on parle On n'est même pas capable Alors, comme geste symbolique, au nom des Métis, je voudrais tout simplement remettre cette 10 constitution aux femmes métisses. La constitution est 11 contenue dans le drapeau, mais étant donné qu'il faut 12 l'expliquer, il y a quelques mots qui sont écrits avec. 13 14 On ne peut, comme Métis, comme 15 gouvernement métis, adopter n'importe quelle constitution 16 pour un gouvernement sans qu'elle soit acceptée par les 17 femmes. 18 l'origine, mais j'espère que ce ne sera pas qu'un geste 19 symbolique. 20 que tel; j'espère que la Commission en tirera elle-même 21 ses conclusions. 22 23 Donc c'est peut-être un geste symbolique à Je ne ferai pas de recommandation en tant Alors, par respect pour les femmes métisses, je crois qu'on ne peut pas accepter le fondement StenoTran 381 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 de nos gouvernements sans que les femmes participent à 2 tout le processus et apportent les corrections qui peuvent 3 y être faites. 4 drapeau qui est la constitution et qui est parfait, mais 5 qu'il faut l'expliquer en quelques mots qui, eux, ne sont 6 pas parfaits, nous attendrons donc que les femmes nous 7 disent qu'est-ce qu'elles en pensent avant de l'adopter. 8 9 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you very much. 10 11 Donc, étant donné qu'on peut avoir un I believe Bernice wanted to make a couple of comments. 12 BERNICE HAMMERSMITH: I just want to 13 thank you all for letting us speak this morning. I know 14 I may say some cruel things. 15 cruel things and I apologize if I offended anyone here. 16 More importantly, maybe just one last Sometimes we have to say 17 point. I know that all of you will probably leave here 18 and say, "Well, if you want a voice, go get elected." 19 A lot of us are elected. 20 we get elected as well, regardless of whether we get 21 elected. We get removed from office after 22 I am elected and I have been trying to 23 fight into those boardrooms and say this or that and say StenoTran 382 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 my piece in terms of land and family and housing and many 2 issues that are important to women and I'm not allowed 3 in those corridors although I am elected to the same places 4 they are, the 14 men I sit with. 5 great solution, unless you get elected to be President 6 possibly, and even then I'm not sure if you will be 7 impeached or whatever. So, that may be not a 8 I also want to thank the elderly woman 9 who sat here and spoke because I think there needs to be 10 more women elders that you bring to these tables. At all 11 the circles we have we bring our women there that are 12 healers as well, women healers. 13 Also in this whole healing atmosphere 14 that everybody seems to be in, we are caught up in that 15 as well. 16 and now we are into these circles and we say we all need 17 to heal. The women are healing, they have been healing, 18 I don't know, but asking someone over 19 for supper is usually a good step in healing. That kind 20 of stuff needs to happen, just practical things, practical 21 common courtesy. 22 a good job of training some of you to do that and maybe 23 our duties are not great, either. Maybe some of us women haven't been doing StenoTran 383 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 I want to thank you and I think Marge 2 wants to thank you, too, for allowing us to speak. 3 are going to be some women later this afternoon coming 4 to listen to you and maybe even try to participate. 5 you two, especially, for allowing us to sit in your seats 6 yesterday. 7 There Thank Hopefully this process that we are 8 involved in inevitably will come up with some kind of 9 solutions. I'm a little bit leery to say that those 10 solutions are without some problems in terms of the 11 ingredients that went into it, because I think those are 12 a little bit messy at this point. 13 when the ingredients are mostly appointed or paid for in 14 terms of the recommendations. So, I judge results 15 So, with that as a rider to your results 16 from the activities you went through across Canada, I thank 17 you once again on behalf of the Métis women in my province 18 and the ones that are next to us, because they are talking 19 about you over there as well, in the process of not allowing 20 us into this in terms of whatever specific group needs 21 to be recognized. 22 23 We are not the recognized group, obviously, and we have some problems with our men that StenoTran 384 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 don't recognize us because we are their mothers usually. 2 It's hard for us to know that when we put them in these 3 positions and then they say, "You are not the women we 4 wanted." 5 6 In any case, thank you, all of you, and hopefully we will run into you again. 7 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 8 Claude, you had a couple of comments? 9 MARGE FREIDEL: 10 Thank you. I, too, want to thank everyone here. 11 I think that the one recommendation that 12 I can give to the Commission on behalf of Métis women is 13 I really felt the whole time of your tenure here -- many 14 of the Métis women that I spoke to had a really, really 15 difficult time because of the structures that were set 16 up to come and address. 17 women and their organizations are so under-funded and then 18 when we did want to try and access any funding, we couldn't 19 get there. First of all, I think that Métis 20 Maybe we weren't as well organized as 21 some of the other women's organizations and, therefore, 22 maybe it's part of circumstances that did all this. 23 even in the self-government negotiations -- and I think StenoTran But 385 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 that I would like to see the Commission recommend one of 2 these things -- some of the consultations that are going 3 on and that have gone on that led up to Charlottetown and 4 that are now going on for the money that is provided for 5 these consultations, I think the whole process, not only 6 from women's point of view, I think from a grassroots and 7 a community point of view, is that I don't really feel 8 that the voice of the people in the community and the 9 grassroots is being heard or has been heard at 10 Charlottetown. 11 I go back to the Charlottetown Accord 12 and the referendum. 13 really pushed for us to say "yes". 14 look at the statistics of the results of that referendum, 15 you will find that the Native communities were the ones 16 that rejected it the greatest, and that I think is because 17 there was such a lack of communication or a lack of trust 18 back into that community. 19 telling us to say "yes", we were all fearful and we said 20 "no". 21 In the communities I know our leaders Yet, if you go and Even though the leaders were The government puts this time line on 22 these negotiations. 23 on. Right now there is one that's going Not many of us in our community or those of us who StenoTran 386 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 have been pushed out of the organizations really know much 2 of what's going on right now, yet we are supposed to be 3 going through this consultation. 4 We are never ever going to buy into this 5 until we are part of it, until we are balanced, until 6 someone comes to these tables and says, "Women elected 7 me and I can come here and I can speak on behalf of the 8 women. 9 speak on behalf of behalf of women. 10 They told me that." Men will never be able to Women must be there to speak on behalf 11 of themselves and I think that we have to tell the 12 government to quit putting these time lines on, that all 13 these things are going to happen. 14 eventually and they will only be good if we take time. They will evolve 15 We have taken a long time to come to this 16 point in history and we can't correct it in four months, 17 six months, two years. 18 from this place back to where we are balanced and healed. It will take a long time to come 19 20 I thank you again. 21 CLAUDE AUBIN: Ce qui relève de la 22 question 3, je peux seulement parler pour le Québec mais 23 j'aimerais peut-être stimuler tous les Métis du Canada StenoTran 387 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 à y penser sérieusement. 2 On est tellement habitué à des 3 structures corporatives présentement pour nous gérer qui 4 sont des structure pyramidales... peut-être que c'est le 5 temps qu'on enlève la pyramide et qu'on reprenne possession 6 de soi-même dans le contexte du cercle, qu'on essaie de 7 ne plus répéter les erreurs du passé et qu'on regarde vers 8 l'avenir et peut-être se restructurer politiquement, 9 surtout au niveau communautaire, dans un cercle; et que 10 dans ce cercle tous ceux qui doivent être représentés 11 soient là. 12 Des fois je me demande si on a vraiment 13 besoin d'un porte-parole; pourquoi on n'aurait pas besoin 14 de plusieurs porte-parole communautaires? 15 a besoin d'un leader? 16 de plusieurs leaders? 17 Pourquoi on Pourquoi on n'aurait pas besoin Ce que je veux dire par ça, c'est que 18 si on établit -- et on y pense sérieusement -- dans notre 19 développement de structure gouvernementale, basé sur ce 20 que nous sommes dans le cercle... à ce moment-là, dans 21 l'équité communautaire, dans l'égalité communautaire, 22 dans la parole à la communauté, les femmes, les hommes, 23 les jeunes et les anciens font partie du processus StenoTran 388 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 décisionnel. Et lorsque le sujet sera en fonction de 2 certaines choses, ce sera ce porte-parole là ou cette 3 porte-parole là. 4 Peut-être qu'avec le temps nous allons 5 sortir de cette pyramide, où on essaie toujours de faire 6 rentrer un cercle dans une pyramide ou une pyramide dans 7 un cercle, et peut-être qu'on se débarrassera une fois 8 pour toutes de la pyramide, qu'on retournera au cercle 9 et qu'on reprendra ce qu'on appelle le mot "consensus". 10 Un consensus parfois prend beaucoup plus de temps et de 11 discussion, parce qu'il n'y a pas de décisions qui sont 12 prises par une personne. 13 du cercle, à ce moment-là, si le cercle a décidé 14 d'identifier un porte-parole pour parler à ce moment-là, 15 ça devrait être un consensus. Mais quand la décision vient 16 Je veux juste vous donner ça en vous... 17 peut-être que c'est le genre de gouvernement de l'avenir. 18 On n'est pas obligé de continuer à faire le genre de 19 gouvernement pyramidal qu'on est habitué d'avoir et qui 20 nous a été aussi imposé. 21 Merci. 22 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 23 Thank you very much for your participation in this part of the circle. StenoTran 389 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 We will break for lunch. 3 and we will resume at 1:30. 4 --- Luncheon recess at 12:25 p.m. 5 --- Upon resuming at 1:40 p.m. 6 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: It is 12:25 If we could 7 begin this afternoon, I will do a very brief overview for 8 this afternoon's session so I can free up more time for 9 discussion from the participants. 10 As for previous sessions, the questions 11 for Group 5 are under Tab 8, the fundamental questions. 12 This afternoon's session will focus on the Métis 13 aspirations and some of the impediments that you may 14 identify. 15 what you feel are the solutions to these many impediments. 16 I would ask that we keep our discussion 17 short and to the point, keeping in mind the fundamental 18 guiding questions, and we focus on solutions so that our 19 Commissioners will have your solutions to work with in 20 developing their recommendations. 21 open the floor to the participants. What we would like for you to also do is provide 22 Bernie? 23 BERNIE HEARD: So, with that, I will I will keep it to the StenoTran 390 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 point and very brief. 2 I would have to say the Labrador Métis -- the two major 3 impediments that I see are quite simple: lack of acceptance 4 by the province or by the Premier, if you wish, and lack 5 of funding. 6 a volunteer organization and always have been. 7 province, as you know, doesn't accept the simple fact that 8 we do actually exist. 9 under those circumstances. 10 At the risk of sounding repetitious, We have absolutely no funding. We are purely The It's pretty difficult to do anything Are the impediments the same as the 11 Indians or the Inuit? 12 I can change that "or" to an "and" 13 Indians and Inuit in Labrador, as well as Métis. 14 give you three very quick examples of the differences. 15 Certainly not. Health services. In fact in Labrador because we have both I will The Innu Nation and 16 the Labrador Inuit Association have federal funding to 17 pay for referrals for outside medical services that are 18 not available in the local community. 19 becomes quite costly. 20 throughout 13 isolated communities not connected by road. 21 The only way out is by air if you are in a hurry and it's In Labrador, this Our membership is scattered 22 awfully expensive. We pay our own way. 23 Inuit have federal funding programs for that purpose. StenoTran The Innu and the 391 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 A second and very important example is 2 post-secondary education. 3 wants to go beyond high school, they do have 4 educational-funded programs through the federal 5 government to provide that service. 6 own way. 7 Any Innu or Inuit student that The Métis pay their The third one is legal services. In 8 Labrador, based in Happy Valley-Goose Bay, there is an 9 organization called Labrador Legal Services, which is 10 funded by government, and it provides legal services to 11 Innu and Inuit people who are before the law for any reason. 12 13 14 It does not cover the Métis people. Solutions? Three examples. I don't have any solutions. The solutions, I guess, become rather obvious. First 15 and foremost, we have to be accepted by the province, who 16 gets involved in managing the funding for all Native people 17 in Labrador, as I understand it, and, secondly, we 18 desperately need core funding for our own organization, 19 simply to get organized, which we have never been able 20 to do to the extent we would like to do. 21 are the two primary solutions, as I see it. 22 23 I think these Definition of the Métis, in itself, is not necessarily a solution. I think acceptance is a StenoTran 392 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 solution, but definitions -- we have lots of definitions 2 already and it doesn't seem to solve anything. 3 Self-government? Certainly some form 4 of self-government would help. We haven't put an awful 5 lot of effort into coming up with what we would consider 6 to be the proper form self-government for our people. 7 We have looked at very basic things like some kind of 8 management of natural resources and some kind of control 9 over health and education services; that sort of thing. 10 We really don't have any specifics on that but we do think 11 that's an area that should be further explored by our 12 people, and will be. 13 There is not much else I can say. 14 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 15 Thank you very much, Bernie. 16 Garth? 17 GARTH WALLBRIDGE: 18 I would put a question to Bernie, if I Thank you, K.C. 19 might. I understand you to say that definition is not 20 a part of the solution, but acceptance is and I wonder, 21 do you think that the lack of acceptance by the province 22 might be based on the fact of a lack of a definition in 23 terms of, I don't know, perhaps how big the constituent StenoTran 393 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 is? Is that a concern of the province perhaps? 2 BERNIE HEARD: I'm not sure. I don't 3 know what the province's problem is, quite frankly. 4 I know is they say there are no Métis in Labrador or the 5 province doesn't say that, the Premier says that. 6 are people within the provincial government who would 7 disagree with them, but they won't disagree with them 8 publicly. 9 All There I know that for a fact. The reason I say I don't think definition 10 is a problem, I think we have lots of definitions. 11 know, there are many definitions and most people would 12 agree that a Métis is a person of mixed Aboriginal and 13 some other blood lines. 14 with that and I don't believe even Premier Wells would 15 argue with the fact that that does exist in Labrador. 16 What he is saying is there aren't any Métis in Labrador. 17 I don't think he is arguing with the definition of "Métis", 18 I don't think anybody would argue I think it's just -- I don't know what it is. 19 GARTH WALLBRIDGE: 20 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 21 Mary? 22 COMMISSIONER MARY SILLETT: 23 You Thank you. Thank you. I would just like to try to help Bernie out here a little bit. StenoTran 394 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 We did receive some correspondence from Ray Hawko, who 2 is Assistant Secretary to Cabinet in the province of 3 Newfoundland-Labrador, and in that letter he identified 4 the province's problem with the Métis situation in 5 Labrador. 6 Basically, what they say is that the 7 government of Newfoundland and Labrador recognizes that 8 there are people of Aboriginal descent in the province 9 who identify themselves as Métis. The province does not 10 agree that they are Métis within the meaning of section 11 35(1) of the Constitution Act. 12 13 14 CO-CHAIR GEORGES ERASMUS: Could I just ask a little question before the next speaker? You mentioned the position of the 15 province in relation to the Métis in Labrador. 16 the position of the federal government? 17 recognition there? 18 BERNIE HEARD: What is Do you have We have recognition -- 19 well, I guess you could call it recognition -- from a fair 20 number of departments within the federal government. 21 have a memorandum of understanding with the Department 22 of National Defence for discussion purposes, we have 23 entered into contribution agreements for certain specific StenoTran We 395 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 things with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, with 2 the RCMP, with two or three other departments which escapes 3 my memory right at the moment. 4 number of the major departments in fact that do recognize 5 the fact that we are there and in fact they have entered 6 into dialogue with us. But, yes, we have a fair 7 CO-CHAIR GEORGES ERASMUS: 8 COMMISSIONER MARY SILLETT: 9 just a question of clarification. Thank you. Bernie, You were saying, I 10 understand, that I guess you do have some project funding 11 from Sec State, from the Native Citizens Directorate, but 12 what's the problem in getting core funding from them? 13 14 BERNIE HEARD: I honestly don't know. We did receive that before I was involved with the 15 Association. Our organization did receive a very small 16 -- I think it was in around 1988, 1987, 1986, somewhere 17 in that area -- a small grant from Sec State to do some 18 original initial organizing, one year. 19 have been attempting to get money every year and we have 20 been turned down every year. Since then, we I don't know why. 21 COMMISSIONER MARY SILLETT: 22 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 23 Thank you. Thank you very much for your additional clarification. StenoTran 396 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Greg? 2 GREG SCHOFIELD: In regard to Question 3 1, what I just wanted to add is it's pretty evident that 4 recognition is probably a really big factor in the things 5 that are preventing us as a nation to achieving our goals 6 and our aspirations. 7 I also just wanted to share that in the 8 province of British Columbia, as of November 16th, 1993, 9 that was declared Métis Day in British Columbia. So, we 10 are getting recognition as people and different things 11 are happening. 12 that I am hearing with organizations and groups, funding 13 continues to be a real big problem. Unfortunately, I guess like a lot of things 14 We annually function on a budget of like 15 $5,000 and a lot of our help comes from volunteer work, 16 which mostly makes up the organization is volunteer work, 17 as far as our services and things go. 18 share that with the rest of the delegates, that there is 19 recognition in British Columbia. I just wanted to 20 Thank you. 21 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 22 23 very much, Greg. Roy? StenoTran Thank you 397 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 ROY CARDINAL: The first question is: What is preventing Métis from achieving their 3 aspirations? 4 is not recognizing, is not seeing the word "Métis" in the 5 Constitution. 6 The answer to that is the federal government Are there impediments within the 7 Aboriginal community? 8 solution also. I guess it goes back to the 91(24) 9 What I would like to point out here is 10 until I can go hunting without harassment or until I get 11 my education and also the education of the Métis people 12 in the province that is equivalent to the educational 13 funding as the Treaties, what I would like to point out 14 there is we should get equivalent funding as the Treaties 15 because that's not happening right now and we should get 16 equivalent funding because we are suppose to be recognized 17 in 91(24). 18 Also, part of the solution, I may 19 suggest, would be if the Royal Commission can tell the 20 federal government to try to follow their contract in the 21 Constitution, which states that the Métis are included. 22 If they can back up their word that the Métis are included, 23 then we should have the equivalent funding to education StenoTran 398 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 and hunting rights as the Métis. So, what I would like 2 to recommend is for the Royal Commission to explicitly 3 state to the federal government that the Métis want to 4 exercise their rights. 5 Thank you. 6 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 7 MARTIN DUNN: Martin? Just so that I don't get 8 so tied up in taking these notes that I don't get this 9 particular bit in, I would like to address the issue of 10 impediment, first of all, on a broader basis than the 11 particular circumstance of Métis in any given region. 12 Depending on how you look at it, full 13 time 15 years, part time 30 years I have been involved 14 in this process. 15 are outlined in the discussion papers, so I won't detail 16 them -- a series of techniques that governments use to 17 manage conflict that comes at them. I have come to recognize -- and they 18 It's a very sophisticated process and 19 it's a process that, if you learn to do it, you can get 20 very highly paid. 21 up. 22 government is more than willing to hire you to sic you 23 on all kinds of groups that generate conflict for It's a minimum of $50,000 a year and If you learn to use these techniques successfully, StenoTran 399 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 governments. 2 3 Conflict management is a state of mind. It's a way of looking at things. As long as federal and 4 provincial bureaucracies have the idea that it is their 5 job to manage conflict as opposed to accommodate 6 aspirations, we have a major impediment. 7 experience, that's exactly what has happened. 8 government in this country is in a conflict management 9 mode when it comes to Métis, in particular. 10 From my Every In doing the research for the paper, 11 there was actually some flat-out statements by some 12 government advisors, if not governments themselves, that 13 says, "Putting Métis in the Constitution was a mistake. 14 We blew it. It should never have happened. We have let 15 ourselves in for a huge can of worms here and we have to 16 put a lid on that can." 17 management is about. 18 That's basically what conflict Basically, conflict management is: 19 Okay, we goofed, but let's -- somebody else used the phrase 20 here yesterday -- let's do some damage control. 21 see how small we can make the problem and then we will 22 deal with it on a much more limited basis than circumstances 23 might appear that we have to. Let's That has basically been StenoTran 400 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 the scenario in the constitutional process and not just 2 in relation to Métis, in relation to other Aboriginal 3 peoples, too. 4 The job of the Aboriginal leadership of 5 the last 10 years is to make section 5 mean as much as 6 we can possibly make it mean. 7 Aboriginal leadership. 8 it mean as little as they could possibly make it mean and 9 one of the techniques for doing that is denial. That was the job of the The job of governments was to make 10 deny. 11 Métis do not exist, don't bother me. 12 with that, that's the easiest way to conflict manage, 13 because then you never have to deal with it. 14 Métis don't exist. You just Wells has taken that tack: If you can get away Then there are a number of subsets of 15 dealing with it, one of which is definition. 16 in such a way that it becomes smaller and smaller and 17 smaller, so that Mr. Wells can say, "Of course, there are 18 Métis in the Constitution, but they all live in Red River. 19 20 Define it None of them live here." That's a way of using definition and 21 Clyde Wells does have a definition. 22 Métis National Council definition of "Métis". 23 to accept it because it serves his purpose of managing StenoTran He has accepted the He wants 401 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 what he perceives to be a potential conflict between 2 Newfoundland's desire to use Labrador's resources and the 3 Labradorian's desire to defend it on the basis of 4 Aboriginal right, on the basis of being Métis peoples or 5 of being Innu or Inuit, for that matter. 6 So, I think one of the areas, and it's 7 such a foggy area that I am at a little bit of a loss to 8 propose how you might do it specifically, but if the 9 Commission could find a way and find more evidence in the 10 material that has been brought before it that I am not 11 at all aware of of these kinds of techniques and how they 12 are used deliberately to avoid accommodation. 13 We can't assume good will on the part 14 of governments as much as we would like to. As we have 15 heard leaders say over and over and over again, up until 16 Charlottetown at least, the political will is just not 17 there to make as much of a positive opportunity that section 18 35 provides us. 19 positive opportunity. They can't seem to see that that's a 20 They see it as a danger to the status 21 quo that has to be delimited, that has to be defined, that 22 has to be restricted in any way possible, so that at least 23 it keeps the cost down. That's usually the first line StenoTran 402 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 of defence, "We have to keep the cost down. This is too 2 expensive a process to deal with in any kind of 3 accommodative way." 4 It's my personal feeling -- I just might 5 be getting old and cynical -- that we are trapped in that 6 mode at this stage of the game and I don't see anybody 7 lighting the dynamite to blow us out of it. 8 to be a restructuring of attitude on the part of 9 governments, by the politicians, all of whom sat down at There has 10 the Charlottetown Accord and signed this wonderful 11 agreement that we all managed to achieve but that was 12 rejected by people. 13 The political leadership appeared to 14 have adopted an accommodative mode and yet bureaucracies 15 under that political leadership are still acting as if 16 nothing has changed. 17 has appeared in the Constitution doesn't seem to have 18 accomplished anything very much in terms of the capacity 19 of Métis peoples, in particular, to access and exercise 20 their Aboriginal and Treaty rights and whatever benefits 21 that any given community might be entitled to as a result 22 of that. 23 As you say, the fact that "Métis" Somehow, somewhere, the bureaucracies StenoTran 403 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 of the governments of this country have to get the idea 2 that they will be paid to be accommodative, that they will 3 get a buck up the ladder, they will get their promotions, 4 they will get their raises if they come up with ways of 5 accommodating us instead of ways of defeating us, which 6 is basically what we are faced with now. 7 So, simply because that doesn't get 8 expressed very often -- and I'm not sure why, I thought 9 it should be made a point of here, in terms particularly 10 of the policy development groups that are going to be 11 working from now until the end of the report. 12 they can find ways to address this so that specific 13 recommendations can be made to change the conflict 14 management mode of government attitudes to one of 15 accommodating, positive accommodation, of Aboriginal 16 peoples and their aspirations simply because I think 17 that's, in the long run, the least expensive way to go. 18 19 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: I am hoping Thank you very much, Martin. 20 Richard? 21 RICHARD LAFFERTY: Thank you. I have 22 a list of impediments and I think it's something different 23 to what has been said around the tables that I have been StenoTran 404 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 sitting at or even sitting in the back rooms. 2 I believe the greatest impediment to 3 Métis self-government or Métis anything, for that matter, 4 is the education system. 5 initial stages of education and in fact it even starts 6 in the homes before the education system starts because 7 their parents are misinformed from the education system. 8 It starts right at the very It's cyclical. 9 Going through elementary school and high 10 school, the only thing I heard about Métis is what a bunch 11 of scoundrels they were in trying to define a place for 12 themselves in the Prairies and they were defeated in this 13 great battle and their leader was hung because he was a 14 mad man. Then I get into university. 15 After coming to terms with what I learned 16 in elementary and high school and going to the elders and 17 understanding that that's not the case, I decided that 18 the university would be a place to be because, from what 19 they were telling me, it's a great place of open learning 20 and understanding and you could present any position you 21 like there and it will be looked upon for its merits and 22 its grammatical correctness. 23 grammatical mistakes in the last few years, so there must I haven't had very many StenoTran 405 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 be something in the content that they weren't liking. It's not only the systems and the 3 structures themselves, it's the non-Aboriginal students 4 who don't have the benefit of going back to their elders 5 and finding out that it's not true that the Métis were 6 just a bunch of scoundrels and their leader was retarded, 7 or whatever, and hung for that purpose. 8 those benefits, so they will never find the truth. 9 They don't have I believe that any self-government 10 process must take into account in the beginning some input 11 into the education system. 12 part of their curriculum, whether it is a separate class 13 or whatever on Aboriginal issues or it's incorporated into 14 the core curriculums as they exist. They have to be able to define 15 Something of that nature has to be done, 16 otherwise we will still be fighting in another 200 years 17 with the same governments and the same non-Aboriginal 18 people with the same attitudes who still don't understand 19 who Aboriginal people are and where they come from and 20 what their concerns are all about. 21 I believe that you guys have heard enough 22 with respect to government structures and those type of 23 impediments and I just thought I would leave that with StenoTran 406 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 you. Thank you. 2 3 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Richard. 4 5 Thank you, Could you please identify yourself for the record? 6 ANDY FROST, Spokesperson, Métis Nation 7 of Quebec: For the question of what is preventing the 8 Métis people from achieving their aspirations, in Quebec 9 -- I can't speak for the rest of the people because I don't 10 know their situations; I'm not a politician, I just know 11 what goes on in my area -- in Quebec we have representation 12 from an organization, which gets a core funding from the 13 federal government. 14 There is no input in the core funding 15 from the provincial level, yet the provincial government 16 is tied in with housing programs at the federal level and 17 they give certain amounts of money every year for housing 18 projects, to build low-rental homes or to renovate or 19 whatever, and they always give this on the pretext of saying 20 that they are giving it to the Native people of the 21 province, the way it is structured down to us. 22 23 They put the Métis in with the Native people. We are part of the great Native brotherhood, but StenoTran 407 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 we are also a distinct people as a Métis people. 2 personal view is we don't need to hang onto the shirttails 3 of other distinct people to get what we are getting. 4 My We should be able to stand on our own 5 and say, "We are Métis people. We are not Native people 6 or we are not" -- I don't know if I'm choosing my words 7 right because I'm not a great speaker, but I guess what 8 I am trying to say is that the Métis people of Quebec have 9 among them people starting to realize that the governments 10 are the ones who are putting barriers against them by 11 rolling them all into one ball and saying, "You are covered 12 by the Natives, you are under the Natives." 13 14 But we are a totally different people. We are not Native and we are not from our other -- we 15 are both, we walk in both worlds. 16 both worlds and all we want to do is try and get the respect 17 that I think we properly deserve because we are part of 18 Canadian history and we want to be part of the Canadian 19 future. 20 We have the best of What this other gentleman was saying 21 about the school systems is very important. 22 to share with you a little experience that happened not 23 long ago. StenoTran I would like 408 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 I have a daughter, she is 15 -- just 2 turned 16. 3 and the teacher was saying, "Louis Riel did this and Louis 4 Riel did that", and my daughter turned around and said, 5 "Yes, but he was trying to build a nation for his people." 6 They were taking a history class at school She says, "Well, what are you are talking about?" So, 7 she said, "Well, my dad is involved right now with certain 8 people and they are trying to build a nation for their 9 people in Quebec." 10 The teacher turned around and said, 11 "Well, you are not Native. 12 are green. 13 things like that." 14 "I don't need you to tell me who I am", and then it started 15 a controversy because they phoned me, "Your daughter was 16 bold." 17 Your hair is red and your eyes Who are you to say? You shouldn't be saying So, she turned around and she said, I felt that she wasn't because she was 18 standing up for what she was. But if I would not have 19 told the teacher that I would talk to her and tell her 20 not to be so bold, if I didn't tell that to the teacher, 21 the repercussions for her later at school would have maybe 22 impeded her progress in the class, which might have held 23 her back. StenoTran 409 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 It's really hard to be Métis because the 2 only recognition you get is from your own people. 3 here, we have always been here. 4 we will always be here. 5 who you are or who you can be, I think they have to open 6 their minds and realize that we are a product of two great 7 peoples and that we sometimes walk on both sides of the 8 road. 9 who we are. 10 We are The sign of infinity; The ideal of governments saying But when we get right down to the basics, we are Until we get the proper recognition and 11 our proper place -- I don't know what the proper place 12 is because I'm not a politician, but why don't we sit at 13 the Assembly of First Nations as a founding nation of this 14 country or why don't we have any representatives as other 15 Native people, Native nations have on their own police 16 forces, in the educational system? 17 Just in the education system, it's very 18 hard for my daughter, for example, to go to the school 19 guidance counsellor because he doesn't understand her 20 culture and where she is coming from and what she is living 21 at home and how she is being raised in her culture. 22 this is brought out at school, it's sort of put aside and 23 it's sort of forced upon them to be ashamed of that and StenoTran When 410 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 not to be proud of that and not to hold it out. 2 part of a process that's going to have to be brought in 3 not only to educate our children, but educate, I think, 4 all of Canada and the process has to come from a political 5 process. 6 It's all So, what I would like the Royal 7 Commission to recommend to the federal government is to 8 try and implant also what the other gentleman was saying, 9 something in the school curriculum where the children would 10 be taught both sides of the story, not just one, or they 11 could be taught to be proud of their heritage and their 12 culture and not be ashamed to take an active part in 13 anything they do and stand out and say, "I'm a Métis and 14 I'm going to participate and I'm going to give everything 15 I have", instead of just saying, "I'm not good enough, 16 I'm ashamed of who I am and that's what I am taught. 17 am taught to be ashamed of who I am and I am taught to 18 hide it." 19 I Instead of doing that, it should be 20 turned around. It's kind of a cultural genocide because 21 our children are our future. 22 we want the best for them. 23 all the problems we had and we don't want them to forget We look at our children and We don't want them to have StenoTran 411 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 us and forget our culture and forget that they have an 2 important role to play in the future. 3 not allowed to be taught about their culture or when they 4 are taught at home and it's brought up in the school system 5 where it is shunned and put aside and there's no discussion 6 on it, it's a grave injustice, not only toward the children 7 but towards the children's parents and toward our 8 ancestors. 9 But if they are Maybe the Royal Commission can help in 10 that way, to start helping to heal our people also. 11 healing process starts with our young. 12 and they are born pure. 13 born like that, they grow into what we teach them and what 14 we hand down to them and if we can start handing them back 15 what was given, maybe then we can take our place with the 16 future of Canada, not only in a hidden part of the history 17 of Canada. The young are pure They grow corrupt. 18 Thank you. 19 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 20 They are not That's all I have to say. Thank you very much. 21 Greg? 22 GREG SCHOFIELD: 23 The am referring to Question 3. Just quickly here, I I hope I am not jumping ahead StenoTran 412 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 or anything, but one of the things that I would like to 2 pose and to talk about really quickly are some of the 3 impediments that we are feeling in B.C. with the Aboriginal 4 people there, with the First Nations people there. 5 With the move towards self-government 6 for First Nations people, for us it's kind of an overall 7 concern that, as Métis people, we will not be represented 8 or recognized accurately in that whole restructuring and 9 everything and that we will not receive the financial 10 support that we need for our programs, et cetera. 11 I have heard different people talk along 12 the lines of the oppressed, who now become the oppressors 13 within their own -- looking at the whole Aboriginal 14 picture, if that is to include to the Indian people, status 15 Indian people, non-stats, Inuit and the Métis people. 16 That's broken into all these different categories, with 17 women, and on and on and on. 18 concerns, more so in British Columbia with the majority 19 of the First Nations people being a matrilineal society. 20 Even if their blood lines denote children as Métis or 21 half-breeds, they are still considered Indian or First 22 Nations by the community. 23 So, that's one of our If anybody would like to comment on this, StenoTran 413 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 maybe the Commission on any of their ideas or solutions 2 or my fellow delegates, it would be appreciated. 3 you. Thank 4 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you. 5 Michael? 6 MICHAEL McGUIRE, President, Ontario 7 Métis Aboriginal Association: I think in Ontario I go 8 back quite a few years in organizing, a lot of people, 9 Métis people, in organizing a lot of stuff. When we first 10 started, I was the one responsible for putting up the signs 11 and I put up the signs as Métis only, and I would put those 12 words on the bottom of the thing. 13 When we had our meetings with 14 governments, the Indian Community Branch at the time, they 15 said that wasn't possible for us to do that and we couldn't 16 do that. 17 around this table because the Métis are starting to get 18 organized, the responsibility of the other ethnic groups 19 within the community is not all our responsibility. 20 Our attitude was the attitude of a lot of people We have changed our by-laws, even from 21 day one, because a lot of us didn't understand who the 22 Métis people were or who the non-status Indians were. 23 So, when we formed that group, I made the motion to call StenoTran 414 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 it the Ontario Métis and Non-Status Indian Association 2 and that name stood up to quite a few years until we got 3 in the Constitution and the name is not Ontario Métis 4 Aboriginal Association. 5 two groups in there that are today working together for 6 community things. So, we still have two people and 7 We still have the question of Métis and 8 I think one of the solutions that would be helpful from 9 the federal government is, if they can formally recognize 10 Métis people under section 91(24), that would be a 11 definitive, positive thing for us. 12 The other question on self-government 13 is on the land use. 14 to have some kind of a land base, not as a reserve, I don't 15 think, but, as my friend Henry said this morning, I think 16 it's 3,500 square miles right now that we want to use 17 because we have to pay for self-government somehow and 18 we have to get into taxation. 19 part of it. 20 because right now in Ontario a lot of the communities want 21 to get into self-government. 22 is aware of that. 23 We have to get into that. We have I don't want to avoid that We can't become burdens on the federal system I am sure the Commission Anyway, I think, just to cut it real nice StenoTran 415 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 and short because I can tell you stories for three hours, 2 a formal recognition under 91(24) would be a definite, 3 positive one for us and some sort of self-government in 4 land. 5 says, that's part of it. We have to have land. 6 I don't care what anybody The people from Labrador, I listened to 7 them very intently talking. 8 the same problem at one point in our history. 9 forming in 1965 and in 1967 we formed the Lake Nipigon 10 Métis Association. 11 anything at all. 12 people. 13 we had meetings there. 14 In Ontario we had pretty well We started We still couldn't get nowhere in We were talking to a lot of government In 1969 we said, "Piss on everybody else", and We said we wanted to use our lake. They told us, no, we can't do that. 15 So, a bunch of us got together and we 16 asked them again and we told them at that time that if 17 that lake is not good enough for the Métis people, it's 18 not going to be good enough for the Indian people, nor 19 will it be good enough for the white people. 20 us, "What would you guys do?" 21 that lake up. 22 will put smelts in the lake, and if that don't screw your 23 lake up, we are going to blow your hydro dams off that They asked We said, "We will screw We will put lamprey eels in the lake, we StenoTran 416 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Lake Nipigon." 2 So, we had to do something. Even by saying that, it wasn't just 3 somebody saying that. 4 that of people who put their lives on the line at that 5 time in order to do this. 6 didn't have to carry out those things. 7 the Trudeau government that came down with a fishing 8 licence for the Métis people on Lake Nipigon. 9 be a route that Labrador people have to do. 10 There was actual movement behind They were forcing it that we I think it was That might It's a terrible way to go, but if you have to get recognition. 11 Certainly Louis Riel sacrificed his life 12 for us to be here today and throughout history I don't 13 think Riel was alone when he got hung that time. 14 there was 68 Indian Chiefs also who were on the end of 15 that same rope and I don't think we should forget those 16 kinds of people. I think 17 We heard a lot today from the women that 18 talked here and we certainly appreciate all their views 19 that they talked about. 20 movement, we also helped and talked to our Métis women 21 and they formed the Lake Nipigon Métis Women's Auxiliary. 22 That later became the Ontario Native Women's Association 23 When we formed in Ontario our and that's one group that was working really hard StenoTran 417 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 throughout all these years and doing one hell of a good 2 job. 3 development of our people. ONWA, in itself, was doing their own thing for the 4 In saying all that, I think we could get 5 formal recognition under 91(24). 6 different, it's people who make us different. 7 right within our own communities makes us different people. 8 Yesterday Georges had talked when he was 9 talking about land. We don't make ourselves The people Definitely we are recognized under 10 the Treaty, the half-breed adhesion to that area, but that 11 was over 100 years ago. 12 then. Certainly we multiplied more since The needs of our people have multiplied also. 13 The question about the schools in the 14 education system is something that was -- and I guess we 15 can relate individual stories that happened to a lot of 16 us. 17 to be charged." 18 be charged with?" 19 did you assault anybody? 20 said 'hello' to the bus driver", and that's all he did. 21 Last year my son came home and he said, "I'm going I said, "What the hell are you going to He said, "For assault." What did you do?" I said, "How He said, "I So, we went up to the school. My wife 22 and I went up there and we talked and the principal said, 23 "I can't talk to you today, my bosses are here." StenoTran I said, 418 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 "Your bosses are the people that I want to talk to." 2 So, we went through that and we find out 3 that the bus driver is under a lot of pressure. 4 "Don't you think it's dangerous with somebody under a lot 5 of pressure driving our kids around?" 6 "There is one other thing I would like to really find out. 7 We hear about the high drop-out of students from our 8 schools. 9 record." 10 I said, I also told him, The other thing is they always have a criminal I always wondered in my mind, because 11 I see my kids playing with other kids and they are not 12 called anything else but kids, they are playing. 13 "I always wanted to know what the magic age would be that 14 my kid would get a criminal charge on him and he would 15 get frustrated and drop out." 16 age 13", unlucky 13, I guess, "because right now the 17 principals here are going to be laying charges against 18 my boy just for saying 'hello'. 19 ones that are responsible for getting our kids to drop 20 out of school and that." I said, So I said, "That must be So, you people are the That must be our magic number. 21 22 23 But to cut it right back down to the point, I would definitely like to have my tribal people StenoTran 419 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 recognized under 91(24). 2 will define ourselves as we did throughout history. 3 Meegwetch. 4 5 As far as the definition, we MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you, Michael. 6 Bernie? 7 BERNIE HEARD: Thank you. I would like 8 to thank Richard for bringing up the topic of education. 9 I forgot it and I totally agree with him it's one of the 10 greatest impediments we have. 11 In Labrador we are under, as you know, 12 the Newfoundland education system, and in the Newfoundland 13 education system, in the Newfoundland history portion of 14 the system in the primary schools, we learn precious little 15 about Labrador. We might get three or four pages in the 16 entire textbook. Basically, it tells you it's a cold place 17 and it's a place where the fishermen go in the summertime, 18 not much more. 19 other than to mention that there is eskimos living there. It certainly ignores the Native people, 20 21 That's the same school system that Mr. 22 Wells grew up in and that I grew up with and, I presume, 23 Mary probably grew up with part of it. StenoTran I think it's part 420 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 of the reason Mr. Wells is taking the stand he is and it's 2 also part of the reason he is getting away with it because 3 everybody else that's around him grew up with that same 4 education system that totally ignores the people of 5 Labrador, certainly makes no mention of any Native people 6 in Labrador, other than a passing reference to the Indians 7 and the eskimos. 8 A more recent event, one that really got 9 my ire up about two weeks ago, actually, three weeks ago, 10 the local school board operating out of Goose Bay which 11 manages most of the schools throughout Labrador, certainly 12 just about all the schools in our area, recently published 13 a brand new textbook on the Inuit of Labrador and it's 14 a good publication. 15 it's ever been done and it's now, I guess, put into the 16 school system. 17 I have seen it. It's the first time The author of this particular textbook 18 is not from Labrador and he did a good job. 19 him for it. 20 station about this new textbook and he mentioned in the 21 interview that he was planning two more, one on the Innu 22 of Labrador and a third one on the settlers. 23 I commend He was interviewed on the local CBC Radio This Commission might remember, some of StenoTran 421 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 the Commissioners may remember, that I took issue with 2 the word "settlers" when you met in Goose Bay. 3 "settler" implies European settler, European background 4 or Newfoundlanders or whomever. 5 mean, in my opinion -- and I think I am right -- it does 6 not mean the people that we call Métis. 7 what he meant when he said "settlers" last week or the 8 week before last and he is planning a textbook to deal 9 with the topic. The word It certainly does not However, that's 10 I simply mention this as this is the sort 11 of thing that we are faced with all the time in the school 12 system. 13 of this particular book and I copied it to every politician 14 I could think of asking them to please reconsider the title 15 of his third book and don't call it "The Settlers". I did, by the way, write a letter to the author 16 There are settlers in Labrador, don't 17 get me wrong. There is a very small minority of people 18 in Labrador who I consider to be settlers and they are 19 the people who have come in there who have no Aboriginal 20 background. 21 coastal areas. 22 about for his third textbook. 23 with what he intended, even though the intention is good, They are there. They are there on the But that's not the people he was talking So, if he carries through StenoTran 422 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 it's still not going to get the message across, I guess 2 is what I'm saying. 3 I don't know what this Commission can 4 do about it, if anything. The education system is a 5 provincial jurisdiction. 6 province to at least watch their choice of words on those 7 sorts of things that's going to become part of the school 8 curriculum for many years to come, I don't know. 9 it with you. Perhaps a strong message to the 10 Thank you. 11 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 12 I leave Thank you, Bernie. 13 Monique? 14 MONIQUE McKAY, Special Advisor, Indian 15 & Métis Affairs Secretariat, Regina, Saskatchewan: I just 16 want to ask either Garth or Richard, jumping to solutions 17 here, about the enumeration process in the Northwest 18 Territories, just to get some general background about 19 it. 20 definition that was used in the enumeration was arrived 21 at. 22 collected and what are the perceived benefits of that 23 enumeration by the Métis people in the N.W.T.? I want to know who controls the process and how the Who had input into that, what kind of data was StenoTran 423 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 GARTH WALLBRIDGE: Thank you, Monique. 2 I'm not all that familiar with the 3 enumeration, I just have a general sense of it. 4 of who controls the process, I think perhaps I should go 5 back a step beyond that and indicate how it came about. 6 There had, in the Northwest Territories, as indeed in 7 other areas of this country, been talk of an enumeration 8 for a long time. 9 In terms A little less than two years ago now at 10 our annual general assembly of the Métis nation, the 11 government leader, Nellie Cornier, who is still our 12 government leader, made an announcement that the 13 territorial government, through the Health Department, 14 would fund an enumeration, the idea being that at that 15 point in time the territorial government either just had 16 or was just about to obtain the responsibility for 17 delivering health care to status indians in the 18 Territories. 19 Because our government, the 24 MLAs -- 20 there is a majority Aboriginal population, if you will, 21 or membership within our house -- it was an easy thing 22 to imagine that, depending on the fiscal considerations, 23 the G.N.W.T., as we refer to it, the Government of the StenoTran 424 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Northwest Territories, would at least consider funding 2 health care for Métis people. 3 The bloom is off the rose somewhat at 4 this point in time now that the enumeration is done by 5 virtue of the fact that the G.N.W.T. is suing the federal 6 government over the actual funding for that delivery of 7 health care for the status Indians. 8 happened was the people involved in the negotiations 9 between the feds and the G.N.W.T. came up with a process Basically, what 10 whereby the G.N.W.T. ended up with the responsibility, 11 but the documents weren't clear enough to indicate that 12 they also got the money to do it. 13 we would ever have an enumeration started afresh today, 14 but, in any case, that's why it was done. 15 So, I don't know if The enumeration, I think, cost a total 16 of around $200,000. It's not a whole bunch of money, but 17 then there are not that many people in the Northwest 18 Territories and it was only necessary to do the enumeration 19 on the ground in the western Arctic because in the east, 20 as most of us around the table will know, it's Nunavut, 21 it's a majority Inuit population and there were newspaper 22 advertisements and whatnot taken out in the east just to 23 ensure that if there were Métis living in those StenoTran 425 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 communities, they might then be enumerated. 2 Who controls the process, to answer your 3 first question; the Métis Nation, to my knowledge, does 4 it completely. 5 Métis Nation offices. 6 I have no idea. 7 beyond self-identity at the community level. 8 like Richard could fill us in a bit more on that one. 9 RICHARD LAFFERTY: 10 definition. The whole process is done in-house at the How a definition was arrived at, I don't know that there is a definition It looks We have a general There is three components to our definition. 11 We have a general definition and any Métis from anywhere 12 in the country can move to the Northwest Territories and 13 be considered Métis under this general definition. 14 it is is you self-identify and you prove that you have 15 Aboriginal background. 16 a Métis on a general registry, but that does not mean that 17 you are part of any local or that you have any rights, 18 as far as claims go, in the Northwest Territories. 19 All On that you can be registered as Every local -- well, I should start with 20 the region first. Every region has its own specific 21 criteria which allows individuals to become part of the 22 claim process. 23 Territory and you are from the Saulteaux, which is in the For instance, if you are in Gwich'n StenoTran 426 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Northwest Territories as well, you can become part of the 2 local, but you are not eligible for benefits from the claim. 3 The local level is responsible for 4 defining who their local members are. 5 complicated, but it becomes quite clear once you see the 6 process. 7 part of their membership, but, above that, the Métis 8 Nation. 9 territory, but there is these claims things, which is a 10 tribal concept or a regional concept, if you want to put 11 it that way, which is for claims purposes. 12 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 13 GARTH WALLBRIDGE: 14 The locals are the ones who determine who is You know, you can enrol as a Métis in the western from there. 15 So, it sounds Thank you. Maybe I will go back Thanks, Richard. Actually, what Richard has done there 16 is given the definitional process that's in the by-laws 17 of the Northwest Territories Métis Nation and whatnot. 18 I'm not certain, but I suspect -- and Richard would know 19 this -- that that was the actual process as well used in 20 the enumeration because that's one thing we need to be 21 very careful about, that an enumeration is not a membership 22 list. 23 time dealing with. That's one thing that people sometimes have a hard StenoTran 427 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 For instance, I do know that through the 2 process of enumeration in the 3 Territories many people who might otherwise have 4 self-identified and indeed do self-identify as Métis chose 5 not to be enumerated because of a concern that it was being 6 done by a political organization. 7 a concern, I think, in the Northwest Territories perhaps 8 because the politics of the day there are pretty neutral, 9 if that's the right word. 10 That wasn't too great They are not so charged. In terms of the data that was collected, 11 it was fairly broad. I'm not certain, but there was about 12 four pages of questions and they were relatively small 13 print kind of questions. 14 data on each person as they chose to provide that and that's 15 just to create a master database. 16 on education levels attained, on the type of work in a 17 trade/profession, whatever, that someone was currently 18 involved in, sort of some general data like that that was 19 collected to be used for other purposes as time went on. 20 The whole thing probably took -- well, There was general genealogical There was information 21 I did it for myself and my two children. 22 the three of them probably didn't take me an hour. 23 perhaps 20 to 30 minutes for the first one and a little StenoTran I think completing So, 428 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 less for the others. 2 there to be of real benefit. 3 sort of digested and massaged for other purposes in terms 4 of creating analysis that people can use. 5 hit my desk. 6 who heads up that program for us, is now starting to work 7 with that stuff. 8 I think there is enough information That's just starting to be I haven't even read it yet. Something just Michael Goldney, The perceived benefits. A personal 9 suggestion that I would offer by way of a benefit is that 10 right off the bat a benefit is that something is happening. 11 Instead of people just sitting around talking about things 12 happening, what should be done is an enumeration, a 13 registry, defining who the Métis are, getting a land base, 14 all those kinds of things which are very important things 15 to discuss. 16 of pride that something is happening and that is that this 17 enumeration is occurring. 18 In fact what is happening is there is a sense On that alone, I would suggest that's 19 a major, major benefit. 20 some way to fund even the most basic enumeration just to 21 take that first step in terms of developing that kind of 22 a database, I think there is real value in that. 23 If only every area could find That's pretty much how I would give an StenoTran 429 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 overview. 2 are any. I would certainly take questions on it, if there 3 4 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: very much. 5 6 Thank you You had something to add? Go ahead, Richard. 7 RICHARD LAFFERTY: The paper here he is 8 referring to that Michael Goldney has prepared is an 9 analysis of the data of the questions that Garth was 10 referring to. 11 about 80 to 85 per cent of the Métis in the Territories 12 actually registered through the enumeration process, it 13 gives us a very good indication of the problems that are 14 there, the social problems, and it shows the level, like 15 the gentleman over here was referring to, where people 16 drop out. 17 Although it's estimated that we only got It doesn't say why, but it gives you 18 definite indications of where people start to drop out, 19 the grade level sort of idea, which indicates age in a 20 lot of ways. 21 it, although in doing that there is concern that adding 22 those questions is the reason why we lost the other maybe 23 15 to 20 per cent of the Métis. So, there is good, hard information from StenoTran 430 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 One thing that Garth touched on is that 2 it does instill a sense of pride. You see people coming 3 who are Bill C-31 status -- you know, they have their Bill 4 C-31 status now -- and always considered themselves Métis, 5 but had no other option because once the Dene/Métis land 6 claims process fell, they were just kind of left hanging 7 and there was no process for Métis. 8 an enumeration process and they are standing along with 9 other Métis and it does instill a sense of pride. But now they have 10 Thank you. 11 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 12 13 Thanks, Richard. I am going to remind speakers to make 14 it short and sweet. I am trying to save some time. 15 Commissioners have questions as well. 16 it this way, then we will feed back that way. So, if you feed 17 I have five speakers. 18 FRANK PALMATER: 19 feeling you were telling me to be short and sweet? 20 The Frank? Why do I get the On the paperwork that was passed out, 21 impediments and solutions, some of the solutions are 22 identified when you identify the impediments. 23 and you heard over the last two days a whole bunch of things StenoTran You realize 431 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 that are wrong, a whole bunch of things that in the 2 community are not as rosy as we would like it. 3 All through it I keep thinking about the 4 Charlottetown Accord and what the Accord promised to 5 Aboriginal people; that is, equity of access. 6 Aboriginal people would be guaranteed equity of access. 7 If you didn't get it, you could sue the guys, you could All 8 take them to court. There was a mechanism to fund you, 9 to allow you to take them to court and prove your point. 10 11 The Royal Commission can best serve the 12 Métis by making sure that whenever there are discussions, 13 negotiations, programs and services, whatever government 14 service is provided by either level of government must 15 be accessible to all Aboriginal people. 16 to the programs and services, make that recommendation 17 to the government. 18 Equity of access In your solutions you ask questions. 19 Is recognition under 91(24) part of the solution? Yes, 20 definitely it is. 21 included in that that demands equity of access. 22 isn't provided, then there is a way that we can make sure 23 that it is, through the court system, through a system Federal legislation should also be StenoTran If it 432 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 that everyone recognizes has some powers of forcing them 2 to deal with the issues. 3 court's decision in this country, not everyone agrees with 4 it, but there is some power there through the court system 5 that you can recommend to the government so that we get 6 that equity of access. 7 Not everyone recognizes the Self-government. Is some form of 8 self-government part of the solution? Yes, through the 9 equity of access provisions that we hope are in there. 10 If you are going to have self-government for status on 11 reserve, by jingers you are going to have self-government 12 for status off reserve and Métis off reserve and women 13 off reserve. 14 It has to be there, equity of access. 15 If someone is not getting that service, take the guy to 16 court, take the woman to court. 17 mechanism to do that. 18 to be able to force the issue. 19 There has to be some That's the only way we are going The people who did up the Charlottetown 20 Accord -- and in the province of New Brunswick, by the 21 way, it was accepted, 68 per cent, including the Aboriginal 22 community, because they were informed as to what the 23 Charlottetown Accord meant. It meant that the ones who StenoTran 433 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 considered themselves the forgotten people would no longer 2 be forgotten. 3 to the programs and services that government decided should 4 go to Aboriginal people. They was a way we had guaranteed access 5 So, the whole question and the solution 6 is guaranteed legislated equity of access for all 7 Aboriginal people. 8 make it. 9 10 That's as short and sweet as I can MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thanks for your cooperation. 11 Kirby? 12 KIRBY LETHBRIDGE: 13 I am sorry I was a little bit late getting 14 No reminder? back. 15 Solutions. I think the number one thing 16 is that the federal government recognize its obligation 17 to all Aboriginal people, to Métis people, wherever they 18 originate in this country, and to understand once and for 19 all that Métisism has nothing to do with Euro-ethnicity 20 and geography. 21 corner, it's something that happened all across this 22 country. 23 It's not something that was done in a So, recognition under section 91(24); StenoTran 434 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 absolutely. 2 various federal departments. 3 relationship with the federal government one-on-one, 4 nation-to-nation as our nations evolve and we have to be 5 involved a capacity of sharing jurisdiction with the 6 federal government without any interference from the 7 provinces. 8 9 It has to be reflected in policy of the There has to be a I would like to comment on something that took place last summer up in Eagle River in Labrador. 10 I went into that place with Ron George, who I would like 11 to acknowledge was here a few minutes ago -- I think he 12 stepped out of the room -- and with some cousins of mine 13 from Eagle River, a place where my grandfather was born 14 and my great grandfather was born there. 15 first people to actually settle there. They were all a 16 mixed race, Aboriginal people -- call them whatever you 17 want -- human beings. 18 They were the We went into that place, where some very 19 powerful people had set up recreation fishing camps. They 20 had been there about 30 years. 21 have to have some respect for the people who were here 22 first", and I said, "Exactly, that's what we are doing." They said, "Listen, you 23 StenoTran 435 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 We had our nets seized the first day. 2 The next time we went out, they came in and they flew 3 in, as I said yesterday, in a very powerful wealthy man's 4 private helicopter. 5 and they brought in the RCMP as well. 6 and a helicopter. 7 of DND helicopters hovering around photographing us every 8 move we made. 9 somebody on the bank on the other side of the river. 10 He flew in the fisheries officers There were two boats On top of that, there were a couple If we went to the outhouse, there was They came up and they arrested me and 11 my cousin, Robert Brown. 12 a community I grew up in, about 18 miles away in a boat. 13 They took us down to Cartwright, We passed at least five phones before we got into 14 Cartwright. 15 an opportunity to use the telephone. 16 supper until nearly midnight that night in a jail cell 17 in Goose Bay. 18 that night. 19 We went into their office, we did not have We didn't get any We got to use the phone about 10:00 o'clock We were arrested at 4:30 in the evening. They released us the next morning. They 20 chartered a plane, too, by the way, to fly us into Goose 21 Bay from Cartwright, about 150 miles. 22 the floor of the aircraft. 23 I had to put a seat belt on and strap myself to the floor. I had to sit on There was no seat for me and StenoTran 436 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 It may not seem like much to some people, but it was very, very wrong, inherently wrong. 3 They released us from jail the next 4 morning. 5 "We decided not to charge you yet." 6 get approval. 7 was it. 8 nets and everything and we were just going to go away and 9 forget about it. 10 11 River? I said, "Why are you releasing us?" They said, They had to wait to They figured we were off the river and that They had taken our boat and our motor and our We said, "How do we get back to Eagle You brought us in here, you should bring us back." They said, "That's your problem." This was the area 12 director of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and 13 the RCMP. 14 So, I think one of the areas that we could 15 see government improve its relationship with Aboriginal 16 people is to cease from abusing us and cease from 17 prosecuting us. 18 1st of March and they postponed into October and maybe 19 November. 20 the government make a change, is to cease from prosecuting 21 our people. 22 23 We were supposed to go to court on the So, that's one area that I would like to see We weren't doing anything wrong there. We caught a few salmon and we took them in front of a StenoTran 437 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 place that used to be the old Hudson's Bay Company store, 2 we cut them up and we made sure that they were passed out 3 to the proper people. 4 about it. 5 You know, we didn't feel a bit guilty One last thing I would like to say. The 6 Constitution of the Métis Nation in Quebec, I believe, 7 was tabled by Réjan Pilote today. 8 that's going to become part of the record for the Royal 9 Commission. I am assuming that When that's made available in English, is 10 it possible that we could have the English version of that 11 mailed out to our Association? 12 of the Constitution of the Métis Nation of Quebec, which 13 was given to the Royal Commission, I believe today, we 14 would like to have a copy of it in English. 15 The English translation MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: I believe he 16 had English copies of the Constitution, but not of the 17 booklet. 18 19 KIRBY LETHBRIDGE: This is the one that I am thinking of here, then, yes. 20 That's all I have to say, thank you. 21 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 22 23 very much, Kirby. Donavon? StenoTran Thank you 438 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 DONAVON YOUNG: Thanks, K.C. Just a 2 question for the Labrador delegates and perhaps even for 3 the Quebec delegates. 4 to ask since we are working on Métis self-government 5 options for the Commission. It's a clarification that I need 6 If you look at where I am from and what 7 I am familiar with most, the Prairies, and self-government 8 arrangements, if you look at where the Métis are at in 9 terms of self-government, there have been self-governing 10 institutions operating or self-administering programs at 11 least, but some semi-autonomous self-governing 12 institutions operating on the Prairies for 10, 12 years, 13 some economic development institutions for the last five 14 or six years. 15 In Saskatchewan, if you look at some of 16 the northern communities, many of which are Métis, they 17 have control of their village councils and have control 18 of that governing structure through village councils. 19 In the Métis settlements we see pretty well the full range 20 of municipal services and programs have been accorded to 21 those settlements and even some are in the process of 22 gaining some provincial responsibilities or some 23 authorities generally under provincial jurisdiction. StenoTran So, 439 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 we see a lot of these developments in the Prairies. 2 When we look at options for 3 self-government for the Prairies again, we are looking 4 at enhanced models of municipal self-government perhaps, 5 either ethnic or public. 6 forms of self-government where communities would come 7 together and cooperate in providing services and programs. We are looking at some regional 8 So, when I look at the stage of development that the 9 Prairie Métis are at and the stage of development that 10 the Labrador and the Quebec Métis are at, my perception 11 is -- and I don't think I am wrong here -- is that there 12 are some sharp distinctions. 13 I have heard you say that the fundamental 14 problem, the big issue to overcome in both Quebec and 15 Labrador, is lack of recognition, federally and 16 provincially. 17 problem on the Prairies. 18 are looking at potential recommendations around 19 self-government and what the Commission can do 20 specifically with regard to Labrador and Quebec, what are 21 we talking about in terms of self-government? 22 23 I don't think that's the fundamental So, my question is: When we It's kind of related to this morning's discussion. We didn't really get to it, but are we talking StenoTran 440 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 about a municipal style of self-government, are we talking 2 about self-governing institutions? 3 You mentioned that you are seeking core 4 funding. Most Métis organizations and institutions have 5 been core-funded on the Prairies for 15 years. 6 at where you are at and where the Métis on the Prairies 7 were at in the late 1960s, early 1970s, and I see some 8 similarities. So, I look I see about a 20-year time difference. 9 So, I am really looking for assistance 10 here because I don't see the same sort of options, the 11 same policy options, the same sort of recommendations 12 applying to the Prairie Métis as I do to the Labrador and 13 the Quebec Métis. 14 far apart. 15 practical help here in terms of self-government 16 recommendations or just generally, recommendations around 17 recognition, process-oriented recommendations. The stages of development are just too So, I am looking for some real concrete and 18 Is my request clear enough? 19 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 20 is long enough. 21 Could I go to Claude? 22 CLAUDE AUBIN: 23 It certainly Je pense que je vais faire une tentative de répondre à ça. StenoTran 441 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Premièrement, j'aimerais vous 2 souligner, mon cher monsieur, que c'est très confus dans 3 la présentation de votre perception. 4 Premières Nations du Canada s'assoient autour d'une table 5 de négociation, elles s'assoient autour d'une table comme 6 entité souveraine nationale. 7 l'on parle de cette entité nationale là, et lorsque les 8 Métis s'assoient autour d'une table pour négocier avec 9 le gouvernement fédéral, ils s'assoient, oui, dans une Lorsque les Mais ça fait deux jours que 10 entité nationale mais pas dans une entité nationale 11 interprétée par l'infrastructure. 12 Toute l'infrastructure, ce sont des 13 corporations de services. 14 cette structure d'autonomie gouvernementale nation à 15 nation. 16 On n'a pas encore abouti à avoir Vous dites qu'on est peut-être 20 ans 17 en arrière. Je vais vous redonner l'heure juste en 18 fonction de qu'est-ce qu'on veut dire par "nation 19 building", qu'est-ce que ça veut dire, "self-government". 20 Il y a un ancien chez nous qui a dit -- et même d'autres 21 anciens l'ont dit -- "Self-government is: 22 business". 23 Mind your own Voyez-vous, si on veut développer StenoTran 442 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 l'autonomie gouvernementale -- j'avais marqué pas mal de 2 choses ici, mais elles ont été touchées -- il va falloir 3 que le gouvernement... voyez-vous, nous autres, on est 4 à l'étape de se faire reconnaître comme entité nationale 5 tandis que les Premières Nations le sont déjà. 6 parlons d'équité. 7 accepte la nation métisse comme une entité nationale 8 distincte souveraine. 9 Donc Disons que le gouvernement fédéral À ce moment-là, c'est une 10 reconnaissance... je suis obligé de me servir du terme 11 anglais présentement parce que je suis habitué de 12 l'entendre en anglais et je ne veux pas qu'il se perde 13 dans la traduction; it's a recognition of Métis people 14 as a nation of peoples. 15 de négocier. 16 vous avez parlé tout à l'heure pour des corporations 17 strictement de services ou l'application de l'autonomie 18 gouvernementale dans des corporations de services, au 19 Québec, au contraire, nous voulons négocier de nation à 20 nation et nous voulons même prendre le temps de développer 21 cette autonomie gouvernementale sur une base nationale 22 et non corporative. 23 À ce moment-là, on devrait arrêter Je pense que la distinction entre ce dont Donc nous ne voulons pas négocier, la StenoTran 443 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 nation du Canada avec la corporation de la nation métisse 2 au Québec; non, on ne le fera pas. 3 plusieurs années. On aime autant attendre 4 Deuxièmement, c'est qu'on voudrait... 5 je pense que là, il faut le dire clairement, et il nous 6 reste à peu près une heure pour le dire, et je le dis comme 7 ceci: 8 on sait ce que l'on veut et ce que nous sommes. 9 de ça, nous allons prendre... comme j'ai marqué en anglais, 10 11 Laissez-nous prendre soin de nous-mêmes. Nous, À partir we'll take care of the rest. On est prêt à négocier, mais on est prêt 12 à négocier au Québec de nation à nation. 13 prêt et on ne veut pas négocier une entité corporative 14 de services, pour donner des services à notre population. 15 16 On aime mieux attendre. On n'est pas C'est trop important. Lorsqu'on parle d'équité d'accès dans 17 un contexte d'une grande confédération des nations 18 autochtones au Canada, nous voulons nous asseoir à une 19 table de négociation avec nos frères de toutes les 20 Premières Nations du Canada comme nations. 21 ça, c'est l'équité totale. Je pense que 22 Je vous laisse vous-mêmes et je laisse 23 à la Commission étaler et comparer ce qu'on veut dire par StenoTran 444 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 "équité d'accès", parce que -- on n'a pas besoin de le 2 définir -- vous avez un ministère complet avec 4 500 3 employés pour desservir la population des Premières 4 Nations et vous n'avez rien de l'autre côté pour desservir 5 la population métisse au Canada, sauf des petits 6 programmes. 7 d'accès. Alors à ce moment-là, parlons d'équité 8 Ça fait que de nation à nation... nous 9 sommes une nation, nous ne sommes pas des corporations. 10 Je vous remercie. 11 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Just before 12 you begin, Réjan, perhaps Bernie or Kirby might want to 13 respond to Donavon's question. 14 BERNIE HEARD: Thank you. With respect 15 to self-government from the Labrador Métis point of view 16 -- and Kirby will bring me up, I am sure, if I step out 17 of line here, and Mary will also -- we agree that we are 18 light years behind you folks out west. 19 the newest -- not probably, we are the newest, that I know 20 of, Aboriginal or certainly Métis group in the country. 21 We are what I would call a very fledgling organization 22 23 We are probably in this respect. As I said before, we have no core StenoTran 445 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 funding. 2 discussions, never mind self-government, on any topic, 3 meaningful discussions with our membership, because we 4 are so scattered. 5 of coastline that's one of the most isolated coasts in 6 Canada, short of the Arctic Ocean. 7 isolated. 8 9 We have not been able to have any meaningful We cover an area of about 350, 400 miles It is the most It's very costly to travel. money. Even telephones are costly. We have no So, we haven't really 10 reached the stage where we have been able to get any 11 meaningful discussions with our membership on this topic, 12 except in a very, very basic way. 13 We don't know at this stage what form 14 of self-government we would even be looking at. 15 honestly don't know that right now because we haven't been 16 able to sit down and really discuss it. 17 at such things as some kind of control over the natural 18 resources in our area, some kind of control over social 19 services, not necessarily all the social services but 20 things like health and education, perhaps housing, I don't 21 know. 22 23 We We are looking But again these are the thoughts of our executive that have talked about this. StenoTran I really don't 446 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 know what our membership would feel on those lines. The 2 form that we ultimately will, hopefully, come up with for 3 self-government for the Labrador Métis, frankly, may never 4 be the same as you are doing out west. 5 totally different, we don't know that. It may be something 6 What I would like to say, however, is 7 that we are wide open for help and assistance from anybody 8 who has gone through the process. 9 do to help us, we would gratefully accept it and appreciate 10 So, anything you can it. 11 Thank you. 12 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 13 Thank you very much. 14 I have three more speakers and I would 15 like to give some time to the Commissioners to ask questions 16 of you. 17 Réjan? 18 RÉJAN PILOTE: J'aimerais parler sur 19 les questions d'obstacles et tout le kit, puis je vais 20 revenir peut-être sur certains commentaires ou certaines 21 questions qui ont été posées. 22 23 Je suis d'accord avec les différentes personnes qui ont parlé avant moi, et je ne veux pas StenoTran 447 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 recommencer, mais je pense qu'un des points les plus 2 importants, c'est l'éducation et la promotion culturelle 3 de l'identité des Métis au Québec. 4 aussi un point très important au Québec. 5 important d'être reconnu par les gens, ce qui est le plus 6 important, c'est de nous reconnaître nous-mêmes, savoir 7 qui on est. 8 questionné par qui que ce soit, il n'y a plus personne 9 pour nous faire revenir sur notre décision. 10 La reconnaissance est Et même si c'est À ce moment-là, on a beau être critiqué ou Pour la population métisse, la 11 population de la nation métisse au Québec, on ne peut plus 12 revenir en arrière. 13 décidé d'aller de l'avant, et il n'y a aucun obstacle... 14 aucun; on a beau les nommer et en remettre encore le double 15 et le triple, il n'y a aucun obstacle qui va nous empêcher 16 d'atteindre notre objectif. 17 alloué pour atteindre ces objectifs-là; on va les 18 atteindre. 19 Notre décision est prise. On a Il n'y a pas non plus de temps Maintenant, je pense que toutes nos 20 recommandations qui ont été faites... on a fait certains 21 commentaires. 22 que j'ai fait avant ça. 23 font partie du document que nous avons déposé. Je ne veux pas revenir sur les commentaires L'ensemble de nos recommandations StenoTran Nous avons 448 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 déjà fait une présentation à Montréal qui contenait une 2 partie de ces recommandations-là. 3 mettre notre structure gouvernementale en place, et on 4 pense que c'est une des solutions qui va nous aider à 5 accélérer un petit peu le processus et à rétablir l'équité, 6 même si je pense que toute l'injustice dont nous avons 7 souffert au cours des années... je pense que ça va prendre 8 bien du temps avant qu'il y ait vraiment une certaine forme 9 d'équité ou une apparence d'équité envers le peuple métis, 10 peu importe où il est au Canada et principalement au Québec. 11 Nous sommes prêts à Comment est-ce que la Commission peut 12 nous aider? 13 aider, c'est de faire que tout ce qu'on a écrit ou tout 14 ce qu'on a dit ne soit pas lettre morte. 15 participé à plusieurs comités, j'ai participé à plusieurs 16 commissions, à plusieurs forums, dont des forums 17 constitutionnels, et assez souvent, ce qu'on dit et ce 18 qu'on écrit disparaît ou est mis sur une tablette et on 19 n'en entend plus jamais parler. 20 Je pense que la seule façon qu'elle peut nous Moi, j'ai M. Dussault nous a dit hier soir qu'il 21 restait peut-être une année à la vie de la Commission. 22 On espère que d'ici la fin de l'existence de cette 23 Commission, il y aura des actions qui seront prises, il StenoTran 449 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 y aura des positions qui seront prises de la part de la 2 Commission qui forceront même le gouvernement à prendre 3 position sur ce qu'on a dit et ce qu'on a écrit et en 4 fonction de la volonté de la population métisse du Québec 5 et de la population métisse aussi au Canada. 6 Étant donné qu'on a encore besoin du 7 temps pour laisser parler d'autres personnes, je vais 8 laisser mon tour à d'autres personnes. 9 10 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you very much. 11 Dale? 12 DALE GIBSON, University of Alberta: 13 Thank you. 14 particularly interested in the comments that several have 15 made about a formal recognition that section 91(24) include 16 Métis, which I totally agree with. 17 can make a strong argument that it already does, 18 nevertheless, it's good to confirm. 19 My business is constitutional law, so I am Though I think you I want to add something a little more 20 radical to that, though. One of the difficulties with 21 91(24) if it's being looked to as a source of benefit or 22 assistance by those groups is that constitutional lawyers 23 generally don't agree that 91(24) conveys anything more StenoTran 450 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 than a power on the part of government. 2 probably convey legally an obligation, a responsibility, 3 and I think it would be useful to think about adding to 4 that recommendation concerning 91(24) a recognition that 5 91(24) isn't to be seen just as a power, but also as a 6 responsibility to bring about the equality of access that 7 we have been talking about. 8 9 It doesn't MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you very much, Dale. 10 Rock? 11 ROCK MATTE: First of all, I feel very 12 offended by the comment that was made that we basically 13 would be 20 years behind what's happening in the Prairies. 14 It is, I strongly believe, one of the impediments under 15 which we basically can't get our aspirations when we hear 16 comments like that. 17 of the Prairies and those kinds of things have no place 18 in here. 19 Business of the Prairies is business Nor are we confused. I feel very 20 strongly about that. I didn't expect this kind of comment 21 and it brings fear in terms of having anything in terms 22 of this kind of -- we are not behind the Prairies, we shall 23 not be compared to the Prairies. The Prairies have their StenoTran 451 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 own problems, we have our own problems, they have their 2 own development, we have our own development, and I want 3 to make a point of that. It does kind of bring chills. 4 Basically, at this point in time, that 5 kind of comment has cut all my aspirations to basically 6 tell more about the impediments because if we are not at 7 the point where we can understand this kind of behaviour 8 taking place, there is no point in going further, as far 9 as I'm concerned. 10 11 12 13 14 Thank you very much; merci beaucoup; meegwetch. MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Very briefly, Donavon and Richard. DONAVON YOUNG: I guess I need to 15 clarify my remarks. I didn't mean to offend anyone. 16 was simply trying to make an observation that in terms 17 of -- and I was concentrating on stages of development, 18 the infrastructure in terms of self-governing 19 institutions, programs and services. 20 observation that it struck me that there were some sharp 21 distinctions in the various regions of the country so that 22 when you look at options and recommendations around 23 self-government, you need to take into account those StenoTran I I was making an 452 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 differences. 2 So, what might make sense or what we 3 might be looking at in terms of policy options in, say, 4 Alberta or 5 make sense in, say, Labrador because you have different 6 conditions, you have different stages of developments. 7 Perhaps I didn't express myself clear enough, but that's 8 what I was trying to get at, that for me -- and the people 9 from Labrador seem to agree -- there are these differences. Manitoba or Saskatchewan may not necessarily 10 11 So, I'm just trying to, one, get a handle 12 on the differences and, two, and more importantly from 13 a policy perspective, try to understand what can be done 14 because we have to look across the country. 15 say, I certainly didn't mean to offend anyone. 16 17 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: But, as I Thank you, Donavon. 18 Richard? 19 RICHARD LAFFERTY: I would just like to 20 -- perhaps it's only a comment, but I will try and form 21 it in a question style. 22 constitutional lawyer from the University of Alberta's 23 comments. I would like to respond to our They seem inconsistent to me because, on one StenoTran 453 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 hand, he is suggesting that we don't need any further 2 amendment to say that we are included in 91(24), so it's 3 already understood. 4 a requirement that we insist that the fiduciary component 5 is a responsibility, not a privilege. 6 only cloud the issue again. 7 problem is constitutional lawyers. 8 9 Yet he is saying that perhaps it's I think that would So, perhaps part of our If the government, which it is doing now, is accepting the fact that there is a fiduciary 10 responsibility, why would anybody want to cloud the issue 11 in suggesting that we get a change to the Constitution 12 saying that it is a responsibility? 13 some reasoning behind that. 14 DALE GIBSON: Maybe you could give When I say I think there 15 is already -- there are two factors here. 16 I think that Métis are included in 91(24), though not 17 explicitly mentioned. 18 more difficult legal conclusion to arrive at, I think you 19 can make a strong argument that there is a responsibility 20 there. 21 One is that The second is, though it's a much One of the problems with the 22 responsibility, the fiduciary responsibility, is that all 23 the courts have recognized up to now is an obligation on StenoTran 454 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 the part of the Crown -- that is, the executive arm of 2 government -- but not a responsibility on the part of 3 Parliament, the legislative arm of government. 4 that, the conclusions that I am suggesting are conclusions 5 that I would draw if I were a judge of the Supreme Court 6 of Canada, but I'm not a judge of the Supreme Court of 7 Canada and probably never will be. Not only 8 What I was suggesting was that if you 9 write into the text of the Constitution a clear statement 10 of what I now believe the law to be, you may avoid a future 11 constitutional decision that comes down contrary to what 12 I think the law is. 13 certainly not to befuddle. 14 15 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 18 I believe Kirby has a real short comment. 16 17 So, my intent was to clarify and KIRBY LETHBRIDGE: Very short, very short. I wasn't offended by what Don said, but 19 that's neither here nor there how anybody else feels. 20 I would like to just put this out as, I think, a way of 21 explaining why it is that we end up in little things -- 22 in which I don't mean to demean you at all, Rock, either 23 -- how we end up in little situations that can grow right StenoTran 455 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 out of proportion, can become things out of proportion. 2 In Labrador, we are, 3 infrastructure-wise, behind. There is a very good reason 4 for that. 5 we were just Labradorians, with a relationship that was 6 our own and we didn't feel threatened at all. 7 organizing of the Inuit and the Naskapis-Montagnais 8 people, people perceived some sort of a threat. 9 tried to get involved in discussions with governments to At one time we were all just people of Labrador, With the When we 10 get some basic funding so that we could develop our 11 infrastructure and properly inform our people and to 12 consult with our people, those dollars were not available 13 to us as they were to the other Aboriginal organizations. 14 15 So, that's one of the reasons that we 16 are behind. 17 I do feel that we have been behind the eight ball as we 18 relate to federal funding institutions, which have 19 provided for some contemporary political development in 20 Labrador. 21 I will go back to the small pie syndrome. 22 23 I don't consider it behind as a people, but I think that a big part of our problem is -- I was involved in a meeting with the executive of the Native Council of Canada and the Office StenoTran 456 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 of the Secretary of State, with Monique Landry, on two 2 separate occasions when we were discussing core funding 3 for two affiliated organizations of the Native Council 4 of Canada. 5 the Native Council of Saskatchewan and the Labrador Métis 6 Association. Neither have ever received any core funding, 7 8 9 She said, "The pie is only this big." She actually used these words. She said, "The pie is only this big, we can't make more out of it. Unless the 10 rest of you give up some, there is none for these other 11 people." 12 are not going to cut off any of our pie and give it to 13 somebody else. 14 organizations were adamant about that. 15 access comes up again. Of course, the nature of the beast is that we We are strapped as it is. Other So, equity of 16 That's my short comment. 17 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you Rock, you have a comment. I would like 18 very much. 19 20 to leave some time for the Commissioners. 21 questions. 22 They have some So, I will ask you to be very brief. ROCK MATTE: I will be short and sweet. 23 StenoTran 457 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Basically, I maintain my position and 2 I find it hard to accept the apologies because the words 3 were said into a concept, which I believe is an evolutionary 4 concept under which we have to fit into a box, a box under 5 which we are going to have to take programs designed by 6 someone which will basically build it, which will not fully 7 reflect who we are as people. 8 9 When you have the number situation, ratio situation of Aboriginal/non-Aboriginal such as we 10 have in the Prairies, it might be good for them. 11 us, in some situations, it is going to turn out that we 12 are going to lose our identity as people. 13 But for I think it's a great impediment to let 14 us be who we are as people and to be able to evolve as 15 a different people with our own house, not someone else's 16 house or built by somebody else. 17 have long gone. 18 to build a house ourselves and we need support, not 19 overbearing fraternalistic attitudes. 20 gone. 21 partnership and if we are true to our words, let's be true 22 partners. 23 The Darwinism theories If we ought to build a house, we ought We can't fit in that. That has long If we ought to build a We are entitled as people to do our own StenoTran 458 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 mistakes and that's what we intend to do, to learn from 2 our own mistakes. 3 in control of our destiny and we will learn from our 4 mistakes. 5 gone for that. We will make mistakes, but we will be We won't be children no more. The time is long 6 I want to say thank you. 7 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 8 very much. 9 10 Thank you I will invite the Commissioners, if they have some questions. 11 CO-CHAIR GEORGES ERASMUS: I have some 12 very small ones that could be answered pretty quickly. 13 I can look at the census information, I guess, as to how 14 many people there are that call themselves Métis in the 15 different provinces, but I wouldn't mind knowing in Quebec 16 how many people regard themselves as Métis, if you haven't 17 done the census, your own enumeration, which I don't expect 18 you have at this point yet. 19 how many people you think there are that are Métis in 20 Quebec? 21 22 23 Could you have a guess of RÉJAN PILOTE: Même si c'est une question simple, la réponse n'est sûrement pas simple. Nous, on croit que pour la nation métisse StenoTran 459 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 au Québec... certains disent qu'il y en a un million; 2 d'autres disent que dans les recensements, si on parle 3 seulement de ceux qui sont déclarés comme Métis, il y en 4 a environ 8 000 en 1986, ceux qui ont répondu "mixed blood", 5 il y en a un petit peu plus, et si on rajoute les sept 6 ou huit catégories d'autochtones, je ne sais pas exactement 7 quel nombre on a. 8 9 Par contre, nous, on sait très bien qu'on peut faire le dénombrement ou l'énumération des Métis, 10 ou on peut faire partie d'une association autochtone 11 quelconque, mais quand il s'agit d'être citoyen d'une 12 nation, quand tu signes un papier où, en signant ce papier 13 tu n'est plus Québécois ou tu n'es plus Canadien, tu est 14 Métis, tu es citoyen métis, et partout où tu vas avoir 15 ton numéro d'assurance sociale ou partout où tu vas 16 présenter une carte d'identité, ce sera une carte 17 d'identité métisse... nous, on croit que si dans quelques 18 années, et même dans plusieurs années, on est 2 000 ou 19 entre 2 000 et 5 000, je pense qu'on va avoir gagné le 20 gros lot. 21 En plus, nous, on dit que le nombre 22 importe peu. Vous savez, au Québec, il y a des bandes 23 qui sont 60, il y a des réserves où il y a 60 résidents, StenoTran 460 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 et il y a des nations où ils sont environ 200. 2 que le nombre importe? 3 on est 200, je suis bien content; si on est 300, 400, 500 4 ou 1 000 ou 2 000, je suis bien content. 5 Alors est-ce La nation métisse au Québec, si Pour nous, le nombre importe peu. Ce 6 qui nous importe, nous, c'est la qualité des citoyens. 7 C'est une des raisons pourquoi on ne veut pas aller trop 8 vite, c'est une des raisons pourquoi on ne veut pas baser 9 notre nation sur des corporations de services, parce que 10 dans ce temps-là, quand il y a des avantages trop 11 facilement, on a des gens qui sont plus ou moins convaincus 12 de ce qu'ils sont. 13 convaincus, et le résultat importe plus que le nombre. Nous, ce qu'on veut, c'est des citoyens 14 Je ne sais pas si j'ai bien répondu à 15 votre question, mais en ce moment, nous sommes en train 16 de faire un dénombrement provisoire, et tout encore est 17 fait sur une base bénévole. 18 commencé à envoyer leur formulaire, il y en a plusieurs 19 qui le remplissent sur place, il y en a plusieurs qui en 20 prennent pour faire remplir à leur famille proche. 21 on n'en a pas fait le décompte encore. 22 va commencer à faire le décompte, on va informer le 23 gouvernement. Il y en a plusieurs qui ont StenoTran Donc Aussitôt qu'on 461 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Ce qu'il est important de dire aussi, 2 c'est que nous aurons toujours des listes ouvertes... quand 3 nous aurons notre registre des citoyens de la nation 4 métisse, ce sera un registre ouvert, et quand nous 5 négocierons ce sera sur la base de ce registre-là et non 6 pas sur des chiffres hypothétiques d'un recensement 7 quelconque. 8 mais une question de liste de citoyens, de registre de 9 citoyens. Ce ne sera pas une question de recensement, Ce sera sur cette base-là. Quand nous 10 parlerons de la nation métisse et quand nous parlerons 11 au nom de la population métisse, ce sera au nom de ce 12 registre-là des gens qui sont inscrits à notre liste de 13 la nation. 14 CO-CHAIR GEORGES ERASMUS: Thank you. 15 Earlier you were talking about where we 16 could find the Métis and I guess some of them are in mixed 17 communities. 18 actually find predominantly Métis or are there actually 19 Métis communities in Quebec? 20 ANDY FROST: Are there communities where we could In the communities of Fort 21 Coulonge-Mansfield, it's two municipalities that are 22 closely linked together. 23 approximately 1,000 people and I believe there is about In Fort Coulonge, there is StenoTran 462 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 3 550 to 575 Métis people registered with the organization. In Mansfield I don't know the population of the municipality, but it would be about 1,500. 4 There is about 650 to 700 Métis people 5 in those communities, but they live in harmony with 6 everybody else because everybody knows who we are up there. 7 It's a community feeling. It's not a segregation amongst 8 ourselves because there is no animosities because we live 9 together. Sometimes animosities do arise, but it's when 10 it's -- how could I say -- imposed or because of a system 11 that's in place where the Métis people can't voice their 12 own opinions. 13 because we are not smart enough to do our own work. 14 stuff like that that creates animosity with outside people. Outside people come in and take our jobs It's 15 I hope that answers your question. 16 CO-CHAIR GEORGES ERASMUS: 17 In Labrador, obviously, you haven't done Certainly. 18 any kind of census yet, but if you were to try and get 19 some kind of a guess as to how many people will eventually 20 declare themselves as Métis, do you have a rough idea? 21 BERNIE HEARD: You are quite right, we 22 haven't done any count, an enumeration of any kind. 23 best guess would be somewhere in the range between 3,000 StenoTran My 463 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 and 4,000, maximum, and they are scattered from Happy 2 Valley-Goose Bay in the north right down to Anticlerc (ph) 3 on the Quebec border in the south. 4 5 CO-CHAIR GEORGES ERASMUS: Thank you. Those are my questions. 6 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 7 COMMISSIONER VIOLA ROBINSON: 8 you. Viola? Thank I have a question. 9 I guess when I hear you talking about 10 self-government and how a vehicle is going to be provided 11 to you in order to achieve self-government, from listening 12 yesterday and today, it seems that at least some of you 13 felt that the Charlottetown Accord would have provided 14 that vehicle for you. 15 we met with Métis National Council, they talked about the 16 Métis Nation Accord and we have been asked to promote and 17 to support that Métis Nation Accord. At the Charlottetown Accord, when 18 I would like to know for my own purposes 19 here, would the Métis Nation Accord assist you or would 20 that be the vehicle or would it be something similar to 21 that or could there be an accord, a national accord, an 22 accord of some type that could be accessed or used by Métis 23 people in the east, as well as those in the west? StenoTran 464 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Anybody can answer that, but I think it 2 has to be somebody from maybe Labrador. 3 this is because of the recognition that has been pointed 4 out to us here, particularly in Labrador, saying -- and 5 I know that they are not recognized as an Aboriginal 6 constituency of Labrador. 7 would have been approved, if it had have passed, would 8 that have given you, as Métis people in Labrador, a vehicle, 9 in a way, to access self-government? 10 The reason I say If that Charlottetown Accord KIRBY LETHBRIDGE: I think totally to 11 the contrary. 12 the Constitutional task Force with the Native Council of 13 Canada at the time, and it was made very clear to me through 14 discussions that I had with Justice people and many legal 15 people from across this country that we certainly had a 16 lot to fear from the implementation of a Métis Nation 17 Accord, as it was agreed upon at the end of the 18 Charlottetown process. 19 I was part of the political task force, The non-derogation clauses in there were 20 not sufficient. They were perceived by a constitutional 21 lawyer who happens to be the premier of the province of 22 Newfoundland, they were perceived to be driving the nail 23 in our coffin. That's exactly how we perceived it, that's StenoTran 465 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 how we will see it. 2 Mr. Clark made it very clear. I was 3 pushing this issue right up to the last day, until the 4 25th of October, and we finally received a letter from 5 Mr. Clark to Ron George, I think, on the day of the 6 referendum. I think it was the 26th of October. 7 That day we received a letter from Joe 8 Clark and he sort of like beat around the bush on it, you 9 know. He didn't come really clear on his position. He 10 was saying that other Métis people who are not a part of 11 the Accord would be able to negotiate some form of 12 self-government institutions separate from this. 13 certainly indicated to me that we were not going to be 14 in any way benefiting from such an accord. 15 certainly didn't seem to think so. 16 17 18 19 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: So, it Mr. Wells Thank you very much. That was a real loaded question. I have three other people who want to respond. 20 Réjan? 21 RÉJAN PILOTE: Je suis exactement du 22 même avis que Kirby au sujet de l'Accord de Charlottetown; 23 peut-être que c'était bon pour les Métis de l'ouest, mais, StenoTran 466 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 à l'est de la Rivière Rouge, il n'y avait rien de bon pour 2 nous. 3 ne nous a pas du tout rassurés. Et la tentative de M. Joe Clark de nous rassurer 4 Une chose est sûre, et c'est que la 5 reconnaissance comme Métis, à mon avis, je suis très 6 content que ce soit dans l'article 35 et qu'on dise qu'on 7 est inclus dans le 91(24), mais, quant à moi, ma 8 reconnaissance ou mon droit n'est pas rattaché à ça, il 9 est rattaché à notre droit inhérent, à nos droits 10 ancestraux. Donc, pour moi, toute la question qui tourne 11 alentour de l'article 35 et 91(24), c'est seulement pour 12 légitimer les actions du gouvernement, parce que si on 13 n'est pas là, tout l'argent qui a été dépensé pour les 14 Métis, c'est tout de l'argent illégal. 15 gouvernement veut seulement légitimer ses actions envers 16 nous, il doit tout simplement prendre les actions qu'il 17 veut, et je crois que c'est dans son intérêt de le faire. 18 Maintenant, nous, on n'attend pas après Donc si le 19 ça pour établir notre gouvernement ou établir ce qu'on 20 veut. 21 ses responsabilités fiduciaires envers nous, qu'il nous 22 donne les moyens et qu'il rétablisse une certaine équité, 23 et on va faire notre job. On veut seulement que le gouvernement remplisse StenoTran 467 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you very much. 3 Henry? 4 HENRY WETELAINEN: I, too, think that 5 the Accord failed in the sense that it was voted down by 6 the very people that it proposed to represent in Ontario. 7 The vote "no" was high in our communities and a lot of 8 our leaders did go against it, even though the leader of 9 this organization at that time was out in the communities 10 trying to sell it. 11 down there. 12 It did not happen and it was voted Therefore, I could not, today as a 13 politician from Ontario, support it. 14 up too much and one of the clauses that I really have trouble 15 with is that basically they have given up the right or 16 the protection from taxation or the right to discuss 17 revenue-sharing. 18 that was flawed because if you are talking about an 19 independent nation and you are talking about 20 self-government, you have to be able to negotiate the 21 fiscal arrangements to make it work. 22 you start from that basis that you are dealing as equals. 23 I think they give To me it was a key clause in the Accord You already give up too much. StenoTran I don't believe if 468 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 The other thing is that it has come to 2 our view that the Ontario government supported this knowing 3 full well that their plan was to create another class of 4 Métis in the province. 5 a first class Métis that would sign this accord, they would 6 have another second class Métis which they would sort of 7 call something else again, and these are things that we 8 had learned after that, that these were actually parts 9 of the negotiations within the province of Ontario's 10 They figured that they would have negotiating team. 11 Thank you. 12 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 13 Thank you very much. 14 Frank? 15 FRANK PALMATER: I'm not sure, but I get 16 the perception that a couple of people got the question 17 wrong. 18 were asking is: 19 applicable to all Métis in Canada? 20 in that Accord it had a definition who was the Métis. 21 Was I against that Accord, yes. 22 Charlottetown Accord, yes, because it guaranteed equity 23 of access and if I didn't get it, I could take the bastards I think -- I'm not 100 per cent sure -- what you Was the MNC, the Métis Nation Accord, No, it was not because Was I for the StenoTran 469 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 to court. 2 good. I liked that, I really liked that. 3 That was We spent $97,000 taking the province of 4 New Brunswick to court. We won. I'm not afraid of the 5 court system. 6 get it, our brothers and sisters on reserve, the government 7 powers that be, those who have the dollars and distribute 8 them, if we didn't get it, we could have taken them to 9 court. Now we hunt and we fish. So, if we didn't That would have helped us a lot. 10 So, I was in favour of the Charlottetown 11 Accord, but I was dead set against, and I still am, the 12 Métis Nation Accord's definition of who a Métis is. 13 Everything else that applied to them, it was hunky-dory, 14 tickety-boo. 15 there, I don't care. 16 I didn't live there, I'm not going to move It was up to them. But their definition as to who a Métis 17 was, that really struck home with me because they were 18 exclusionary. 19 River Valley and those who were fringe groups around the 20 area. 21 I still am, to that definition of who a Métis is. I won't 22 allow anybody to tell me who I am or who I am not. That's 23 my choice. They said it was only those from the Red I was vehemently opposed to it at that time, and Ain't nobody can take that from me. StenoTran 470 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 But the Charlottetown Accord, when I 2 mentioned it a while ago, it would have given us an 3 opportunity to participate because it had an equity of 4 access clause in it and there are enough non-derogation 5 clauses in it so that it wouldn't have taken away from 6 our responsibilities. 7 country who doesn't believe that taxation is going to be 8 a necessary evil of our people, man, they are walking down 9 a road that has a dead end, a big one right at the end. Any Aboriginal leader in this 10 11 If you don't tax your people or you don't 12 put some system in there to generate revenue from some 13 of the things that you have control over, how do you keep 14 getting it? 15 golden egg forever. 16 that part of the goose that lays the egg is getting sore 17 and there are no more eggs coming. 18 eventually some day. The government is not a goose that lays the Somebody once told me one time that It's going to happen 19 Self-government will become a reality. 20 What form of self-government that is, it's going to take 21 a whole bunch of people and a whole bunch of time. 22 is one process, but a guaranteed equity of access in any 23 form that we have must be there and I believe the StenoTran This 471 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Charlottetown Accord went a long way to achieve that. 2 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you 3 very much. I will take two very short responses to Viola's 4 question because there are other Commissioners who have 5 other questions. Very short, please. 6 Rock? 7 ROCK MATTE: I think part of the 8 question that maybe we are overlooking, as I understood 9 -- maybe I misunderstood -- is the possibility of a 10 pan-national Métis accord. I, frankly, do believe that 11 is -- I think it was part of the question, which we haven't 12 touched yet and I honestly, frankly, believe that it's 13 possible that we have a pan-national Métis accord and maybe 14 the Royal Commission could be instrumental in helping to 15 facilitate another Métis meeting which will regroup the 16 women that came and were offended by the lack of sensibility 17 in terms of being able to participate, maybe our brothers 18 from the Red River, and we would be willing to come again 19 maybe to discuss and see if, yes, it can be possible. 20 I think, frankly, we could make a step 21 in the direction to maybe meeting some more on that specific 22 question. 23 wrong and it won't be possible, but at least it's worth After those two days maybe I will be proven StenoTran 472 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 the try. That's the first part of the question, a 2 pan-national Métis accord has to be looked into. 3 the question can be objective for the meeting. 4 Maybe Second, the Charlottetown Accord, to my 5 understanding, was kind of a nightmare on many levels. 6 We saw on national TV that the protocol was broken after 7 Mr. Bourassa was invited. 8 individual on the sidewalk waiting to be invited for 9 supper. There was an unfortunate Those things are important. Many of our elders 10 were watching TV and they knew at that point in time that 11 this was a fundamental flaw within the protocol of the 12 Accord. 13 into the community and try to sell it. So, they didn't need anybody's rhetoric to go 14 At that time, I think the Accord was 15 re-opened. 16 for further negotiation. 17 many of the First Nations and Métis organizations with 18 regard to what the actual Accord on the technical level 19 was containing for us as a distinct people. 20 me, reneging 400 years, if not more, of a constant point 21 of recognition as distinct people. 22 against 400 years of my grandfathers singing the same song. 23 Everything that was agreed on was re-opened I registered my dissidence with It was morally unacceptable. StenoTran It was, to So, I couldn't go 473 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 The Métis Accord, as it stands now, is 2 unacceptable because any modification to that actual 3 accord would be an add-on, which is going to be far from 4 sufficient to what I see as a partnership developing 5 between our brothers from the Prairies and ourselves and 6 any partnership. 7 forgotten item, on the agenda. We don't want to be an add-on, a 8 Thank you. 9 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 10 ANDY FROST: Andy? On the Charlottetown 11 Accord, I would just like to say that when the Charlottetown 12 Accord was coming out of the process at the community level, 13 when we finally got a copy of it, it was already dead in 14 the water. So, maybe an Accord would be good in the future. 15 16 If there is an Accord that is struck up, 17 it would be very important to go back to the people, from 18 the grassroots right down into the communities, and get 19 their advice also because sometimes we elect politicians 20 and sometimes they take decisions on themselves to put 21 things in accords which don't quite sit right with the 22 communities. 23 until it's either passed or until it's dead in the water, Oftentimes we don't see the documentation StenoTran 474 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 like this Accord was. 2 What I'm suggesting is if there ever is 3 another accord or something along those lines, also to 4 everybody here, try to get back to your people right down 5 at your local communities and get your people involved 6 because they are the ones that we are supposed to be 7 representing. 8 Thank you. 9 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 10 very much. 11 12 I believe some of the other Commissioners have questions. 13 Mary? 14 COMMISSIONER MARY SILLETT: 15 Thank you Thank you very much, K.C. 16 Just a comment on the Métis Nation 17 Accord. When we were in Saskatoon, we had simultaneous 18 workshops, maybe four or five, going on at the same time 19 and in the workshop that Mr. Dussault and I were on, it 20 was very, very clear that many of the members of the Métis 21 Nation supported the Métis Nation Accord for their members 22 and they felt that that was something that they had 23 developed after a long period of consultation with their StenoTran 475 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 members, it was acceptable to many of them, and that there 2 was a feeling that there should, however, be another 3 process for the 4 within the Métis Nation. Métis people who were not represented 5 Having said that, one of the questions 6 that I still have after two or three days is, how do you 7 develop a definition of "Métis" which is inclusionary -- 8 a lot of people have used that term very much over the 9 past two days -- but which is acceptable to both groups. 10 11 I guess the reality that I am seeing is 12 that there are members of the Métis Nation and there is 13 also Métis that are outside the Métis Nation and, clearly, 14 both groups have different issues. 15 I have always wondered in my own mind, at the end of the 16 day what do we do. 17 separately for each group? 18 For the Commission, Do we develop recommendations It struck me, too, that there are 19 differences in definitions between Métis for the MNC and 20 what I heard through this forum. 21 that the most liberal definition of "Métis" could be anyone 22 with mixed blood. 23 I guess I felt yesterday I think the MNC is more restricted. Clearly, the definition was very, very StenoTran 476 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 large and I'm just wondering, does anyone have anything 2 to say about that? 3 Commission should deal with, is it an issue that the 4 leadership should deal with, have the Métis leaders gotten 5 into a room and discussed this issue, what have the 6 conclusions been, is this something which is none of our 7 business or what? 8 9 For example, is it an issue that the MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Way to go, Mary, we have seven names already. 10 I think what I would like to do is I will 11 take a coffee break right now. You know what the question 12 is. 13 break right now and then the time that we had wanted to 14 set aside at the end for the general discussion, we are 15 doing that now. I have a list of eight people. We will take a coffee 16 ROY CARDINAL: 17 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 18 Point of order. order? 19 ROY CARDINAL: 20 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 21 Yes. I'm not officially a chair, but --- 22 23 Point of ROY CARDINAL: You look like one, anyway. StenoTran 477 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Go ahead, Roy. 3 ROY CARDINAL: Thank you very much. I 4 will be going in 10 minutes, so I will make my statement 5 in two minutes. 6 I had to respect all the other people, so I have my 7 opportunity at this coffee break moment. Actually, I had wanted to speak up, but 8 I would like to make a recommendation 9 to the Royal Commission on the Aboriginal People to get 10 the governments to begin immediately to have federally 11 and provincially-appropriate application forms for the 12 Métis people as part of their fiduciary responsibility. 13 Then we would all have our identification and then the 14 government would know who is who in Canada. 15 first people or the third world people? 16 That's all, thank you. 17 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Are we the Just before 18 we take a coffee break, I have an announcement to make. 19 For those of you who have not picked up your expense claim, 20 please do so next door at the RCAP office because we are 21 closing it. 22 Greg? 23 GREG SCHOFIELD: StenoTran This is really quick. 478 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 I, too, am going to be leaving in about 10 minutes back 2 to Vancouver. I just wanted to thank the Commission for 3 inviting me out. 4 Louis Riel Métis Council. 5 every one of my fellow delegates have had to say and I 6 have learned an incredible amount. I will have a lot to take back to the I have enjoyed what each and 7 So, with that, thank you. 8 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 9 Safe travels, gentlemen. 10 For the rest of you, we will be 11 reconvening at seven minutes after. 12 --- Short recess at 3:55 p.m. 13 --- Upon resuming at 4:10 p.m. 14 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: I have a long 15 list before me of people who want to respond to Commissioner 16 Sillett's question. 17 If we can proceed, I have the first name 18 on the list to respond to Mary's question as Rock. 19 ahead. 20 ROCK MATTE: Go As to the question, I guess 21 one of the most important players that could confirm the 22 first point that I would like to make is my brother, Clem, 23 who can confirm that within the Métis group of brothers StenoTran 479 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 of the Red River, their definition is causing problems 2 within the communities as perhaps a lot of their 3 constituency. 4 big problem with the definition of the Métis Nation being 5 restricted to the Red River. A lot of their community have a very, very 6 I guess Clem can confirm that, as being 7 one of the players, as has been my understanding during 8 my journeys in the Prairies, which I go on a regular basis. 9 So, communities are not at all happy with that restrictive 10 definition. Mind you, it's kind of hurting us in the east 11 when we know that the flag comes from us, as well as the 12 sash. 13 appropriated, is kind of a blatant disrespect towards us. Not being recognized and having our symbol 14 15 I believe that in the near future, once 16 we discuss the issue, there will be clarification in terms 17 of that so that the leaders of the Métis National Council 18 will be able to bring these words of wisdom to their 19 constituency so that they will understand where they come 20 from. 21 The definition should be and can be, I 22 guess, worked out with further consultation amongst all 23 Métis people from coast-to-coast, which will involve wide StenoTran 480 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 consultation at the community level, and if we are true 2 to our word to be community-oriented, it shall be community 3 consultation taking place. 4 I believe that should maybe answer some 5 of your questions. If I forgot part of your question, 6 you can always ask it again because it has been 15 minutes. 7 I would ask Clem to confirm the fact that there is still 8 some debate amongst the definition within the Prairies 9 if the Métis should be restricted to the Red River and 10 11 their descendants. Meegwetch. CLEM CHARTIER, Métis Policy Team, Royal 12 Commission on Aboriginal Peoples: Thank you. I was 13 hoping to get another opportunity to say something just 14 to make it clear for the record that I'm not here as a 15 participant from any Métis community. 16 guess, part of the Métis policy team of the Royal 17 Commission, who is working on Métis self-government and 18 is here to listen. 19 yesterday to make some comments on this issue of 91(24), 20 which I did, and I think that's good. I am here as, I I was invited by the Moderator 21 I have to agree with Rock that the issue 22 of who are the Métis, the Métis criteria, is still being 23 debated and I think it will be debated for as long as there StenoTran 481 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 are any of us identifying as part of the Métis Nation, 2 as the Métis Nation. 3 also say that I am one of the ones that leads the debate 4 in terms of the wrong spin that's been put on the criteria 5 of the Métis Nation by the Royal Commission, as well as 6 everybody, because they keep saying the Red River Métis. That will never disappear. I can 7 8 9 10 I, for one, have always stated that that's not who we are saying we are, the Red River Métis. We are saying the Métis of western Canada. I come from 11 northwestern Saskatchewan, I'm not part of the Red River, 12 and I don't subscribe to the label of the Red River. 13 think that's something that hasn't been, I guess, picked 14 up fully by the Royal Commission because they hear 15 everybody else coming and saying, "The Red River, the Red 16 River this, the MNCs, the Red River that", so they are 17 adopting that, I guess, by having heard it so often. I 18 I don't think there is any violation to 19 my saying that in western Canada -- I have already said 20 it yesterday -- we identify ourselves as the Métis Nation 21 and I suppose I take exception to what you have stated 22 in that we have stolen your flag. 23 new to me. That's something totally StenoTran 482 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 In fact I was very insulted yesterday 2 and, out of respect, didn't want to mention this, but we 3 feel very insulted and I feel that even the Royal Commission 4 is attacking our dignity as the Métis Nation in flying 5 our flag with an addition sewn onto it. 6 a violation of our people and our nation. I think that's 7 But, in any event, yes, there is still 8 discussion, but certainly -- and I'm not a leader in the 9 Métis Nation and I say I am here in a different capacity, 10 but Mary made it, I think, clear that the statements in 11 Saskatchewan our people are saying and have made clear 12 is that we are looking towards what we see as our rights 13 as a people, as a collective. 14 You have already said yourself in the 15 Prairies they can do what they want and that's a crude 16 way of saying, you know, us out there, and that's fine. 17 We are doing what we want and on the same basis, like 18 you are saying, you don't want to be boxed in by what we 19 do. 20 to be dictated by your concepts of who you are and I think, 21 as I said yesterday, you should be free to develop as to 22 who you think you are and that's fine. 23 I guess that's fine. On the same hand, we don't want I think the Commission has to take that StenoTran 483 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 into consideration, that people will identify as to who 2 they are. 3 nation, can tell somebody else who they are or who they 4 aren't. 5 and I guess that's what's going to happen. No commission, no government, no people, no People have to be free to grow in and identify 6 We are not overly rigid, I don't think, 7 on the Prairies or in our organizations because you came 8 there and I think you are still a member of our organization 9 at least. So, we can't be that bad. 10 11 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you very much, Clem. 12 Martin, short and sweet, please. 13 MARTIN DUNN: 14 one specific point that I really want to address. 15 point out that in the background paper there is a critique 16 of the Métis Nation Accord that was done at the time the 17 Métis Accord was first presented at the table in the 18 Charlottetown process and it's there for your information. 19 Actually, there is only I will I don't intend to go through that. 20 But the one element I do want to address 21 and the element that generated the paranoia or the fear 22 and concern that many of us felt about the definitional 23 section of the Métis Nation Accord was the fact that at StenoTran 484 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 the table, at the Charlottetown table, the NCC delegation 2 -- I was instructed by the NCC to present the NCC position 3 in the context of almost complete agreement with the Métis 4 Nation Accord. We do not oppose the Accord as a whole. 5 6 We do not oppose the idea that the Métis 7 peoples of the west should conduct themselves in any kind 8 of agreement they please, except that that agreement have 9 the possibility of being seen of excluding others. In 10 order to address that issue, the NCC proposed a 11 non-derogation clause, a simple non-derogation clause that 12 would have said: 13 Aboriginal peoples, including other Métis", and that was 14 specifically refused. 15 This Accord does not affect other So, what was a concern then became 16 full-blown paranoia because on what grounds would that 17 be refused, except if there was an intent to exclude other 18 Métis people or create the appearance that there is only 19 one Métis nation, the membership of that Métis nation will 20 be defined by that Métis nation and there will be no other 21 Métis nation. 22 23 That's what we were trying to prevent. Had there been the possibility of a mutually-agreeable non-derogation clause, we would not StenoTran 485 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 have opposed the Métis Nation Accord at all and will not 2 oppose it again if it becomes clear at some point that 3 the parameters of that Accord apply specifically to one 4 group of Métis and that same Accord admits there are other 5 groups who may make and have different arrangements. 6 That's all. 7 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 8 9 10 Thank you very much for your concise response. Richard? RICHARD LAFFERTY: Thank you. I think 11 in answering this question specifically, the only way to 12 really allow an open-ended definition of "Métis" that could 13 be used across the country is to have the two of the three 14 elements that were used to get the Métis into the 15 Constitution in the first place because at this point 16 community acceptance, I don't think, is an appropriate 17 element to have in the criteria. 18 We are experiencing in the Northwest 19 Territories a lot of animosity from people who identify 20 as Métis, but have Bill C-31 status. 21 cannot get Bill C-31 status, such as myself. 22 I don't feel this way, there is a lot of animosity towards 23 people who have Bill C-31 status and consider themselves StenoTran There is Métis who Although 486 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Métis because they have a choice as to whether or not to 2 apply for Bill C-31 status. 3 they are on a band list and receive benefits and that sort 4 of thing from bands. 5 Once they have applied, then But our Métis nation does not exclude 6 them from our general register and there are many, many 7 people in the Northwest Territories with Bill C-31 status 8 who are Métis. 9 Association with the Congress of Aboriginal People because 10 we do represent not only Métis, but Bill C-31 people, and 11 that is a big contentious issue with our association with 12 the Métis National Council. That is, I think, the basis of our 13 It comes up quite often that we accept 14 Bill C-31 people and we have such an open, broad policy 15 that I believe we were defending a mixed blood individual 16 who considers himself Métis from the Bay of Quinte in the 17 Northwest Territories. 18 rights up there. 19 We were defending his hunting So, I don't believe that community 20 acceptance should be a criteria for being enumerated as 21 a Métis. 22 that you are of Aboriginal descent, then I think it should 23 be sufficient to be enumerated as a Métis person. If you identify as a Métis and you can prove StenoTran 487 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 I know there are all types of problems. 2 You will notice that the Métis nation of the Northwest 3 Territories has their own flag. 4 fought over flags. 5 problems with flags. 6 to be worked out. 7 an educational process. 8 where that flag came from, what the significance of the 9 star is. 10 There have been wars Quebec and Ottawa know well the I think that's something that has History has to be shown and again it's A lot of people don't even know Perhaps some wouldn't be offended if they understood the significance of a star on a flag. 11 I just leave you with that. 12 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 13 Thanks. Thank you, Richard. 14 Réjan? 15 RÉJAN PILOTE: Moi, je ne veux pas 16 revenir sur les questions de drapeaux et tout le kit. 17 Je suis d'accord que quand on va commencer à se parler 18 vraiment à travers tout le Canada, on va arrêter de se 19 trouver des différences mais on va plutôt se trouver 20 beaucoup de ressemblances. 21 Au sujet de la définition des Métis, je 22 conviens aussi avec M. Lafferty qu'on ne doit pas apporter 23 de critères trop restrictifs, parce qu'on ne veut pas, StenoTran 488 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 nous, au Québec, recommencer toutes les histoires... on 2 ne veut pas participer à l'ethnocide des peuples 3 autochtones du Canada et de l'Amérique du Nord. 4 le veut surtout pas. 5 On ne Donc, moi, ce que j'aime depuis quelque 6 temps, c'est qu'on a l'occasion de parler avec des 7 organisations métisses et des Métis de partout au Canada. 8 Ça fait maintenant un an qu'à diverses occasions on en 9 rencontre. J'ai été très surpris de voir jusqu'à quel 10 point on avait le même discours, jusqu'à quel point on 11 avait la même vision de l'avenir et tout ça. 12 Je pense que ce qu'il faut faire, c'est 13 de bâtir une entité nationale; quand je parle de nationale, 14 c'est que, oui, au Québec, on bâtit une entité nationale, 15 mais on doit aussi bâtir une entité qui couvre tout le 16 territoire du Canada. 17 dépendamment de la région où on demeure et on n'a pas tous 18 la même dynamique, mais je pense qu'on peut essayer de 19 travailler ensemble dans l'intérêt de tous, et je pense 20 qu'on va réussir à se parler. Et, oui, on a des différences 21 Je peux vous dire, en tout cas, que moi, 22 je suis très content d'avoir participé à ce cercle métis 23 et j'en retire beaucoup de positif, et ce que je vois pour StenoTran 489 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 l'avenir, eh bien, c'est un petit peu plus clair pour moi. 2 Je vais vous laisser là-dessus. 3 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 4 Kirby? 5 KIRBY LETHBRIDGE: Merci. Thank you. I agree with Réjan. 6 I would like to bring you back to a working group meeting 7 that took place in the Conference Centre here in Ottawa 8 just prior to the referendum on the Accord, the 9 Charlottetown Accord, where representatives of the Native 10 Council of Canada were there -- I was one of them -- and 11 there were representatives of the provinces, the federal 12 government and the Métis National Council. 13 the weakness of the non-derogation language in the Métis 14 Nation Accord. The issue was 15 I think it's very clear to us now, much 16 clearer today, that it appears to have been a governing 17 mechanism to restrict access to section 35, 18 Métis/Aboriginal rights. 19 clear by a representative of the Métis National Council 20 that they were not going to accommodate us in any way. 21 At that meeting it was made very In actual fact, a man who was 22 representing the MNC there stood up and slammed his 23 briefcase and stormed out of the meeting. StenoTran I'm happy to 490 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 say that Clem was not that man, but he was there at the 2 table and is aware of what took place there. 3 over non-derogation and, as Marty said, it quickly 4 escalated to a sense of paranoia. 5 It was all The Manitoba representative at the table 6 that night made it very clear as well that it was his 7 understanding that this was closing the door on everyone 8 else. 9 we called it the incredible shrinking plan, damage control, 10 There were only Métis in western Canada. So then and I still see it that way. 11 If the non-derogation language changed 12 or not, I think that I would still be very, very sceptical 13 about what we are going to see at the end of it. 14 going to see a status and non-status Métis in Canada, are 15 we going to see a Métis nation reserve type scenario? 16 Are we So, I have problems with the federal 17 government accommodating a particular representative 18 organization of Métis peoples in such a fashion again. 19 You can change the non-derogation all you want. 20 adamantly oppose, as we were opposed, a Métis Nation Accord 21 which is restricted to the geographic reference on a map 22 and some Euro-ethnicity as opposed to Aboriginal 23 descendancy. StenoTran We will 491 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 I made it very clear in that meeting that 2 we were very pleased to see that somebody could work out 3 such a deal because it had some very positive potential 4 for the constituents of the Métis National Council. 5 said then and I will say now that the intention there was 6 to do damage control, the intention there was to restrict 7 access to section 35 reference to Métis and the rights 8 that are subsequent to that recognition. 9 Thank you. 10 11 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you very much. 12 13 I One more quick response from Monique and I have some more questions. 14 MONIQUE McKAY: I think it's also 15 important to put the whole discussion of definition into 16 context. 17 about the definition in relation to the establishment of 18 service delivery agencies for Métis people and when you 19 are talking about different kinds of rights that different 20 Métis groups might have. I think it makes a big difference when you talk 21 For example, it doesn't make sense, I 22 think, to anybody that you would be talking about Labrador 23 Métis having rights to land in northern Saskatchewan, but StenoTran 492 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 it may make sense to people that a broader definition of 2 "Métis" would be acceptable when you are talking about 3 Métis people controlling institutions to deliver health 4 care or education or whatever. 5 a broad debate and say one definition will satisfy all 6 purposes. 7 and what you are trying to get at. It really depends what you are talking about 8 9 So, you can't just have MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you very much. 10 Peter? 11 COMMISSIONER PETER MEEKISON: I do have 12 a question which concerns the concept of recognition. 13 I think part or most of the discussion on recognition has 14 focused on 91(24) and I don't really want to address that 15 particular question. 16 I think that has been discussed. My thinking on recognition goes beyond 17 91(24). 18 two days, I think one can make an argument that the issue 19 of recognition runs like a fine red thread through much 20 of the discussion. 21 has taken some time in British Columbia, but now there 22 is a Métis Day, I believe in November, he said. 23 In listening to the comments throughout the last For example, Greg mentioned that it In listening to what the representatives StenoTran 493 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 from Newfoundland have said -- okay, Labrador -- clearly 2 there is an issue here of recognition. 3 you made it quite clear that Mr. Wells does not -- maybe 4 just him -- and you are not sure why. I think, Bernie, 5 In Quebec, as I listened to the comments, 6 particularly yesterday, to the concerns, at least I sensed 7 there is an issue of how does one get the Quebec government 8 to recognize the Métis presence within the province, how 9 do the Métis within Quebec get the First Nations within 10 Quebec to give recognition to their existence. 11 I go back to what Martin said earlier 12 this afternoon on the management of conflict and the 13 examples he gave that Métis don't exist. 14 of solving the problem or to narrow the definition. 15 That's one way Mr. Cardinal, before he left, talked 16 about federal and provincial governments together getting 17 identity cards so people can identify, that provinces are 18 involved. 19 land within Ontario and again that made me think that the 20 provinces at some point are going to be involved in 21 discussions, whether it be self-government or what have 22 you. 23 I go back to what Mr. McGuire said about the So, my question is: StenoTran What advice can any 494 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 of you give the Commission with respect to gaining 2 recognition for the Métis, particularly in, say, Labrador, 3 Quebec or elsewhere where it is 4 this is going to be critical and if you can give us any 5 advice on this, this would be very helpful to me. not there? 6 Thank you. 7 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 8 RICHARD LAFFERTY: I really think Richard? One bit of advice I 9 could give you is in the writing of your report. 10 the report as if you are referring to all Métis, 11 irregardless of where they live. 12 distinction of the Métis of the Red River or the N.W.T. 13 Métis, if you can prevent that. 14 specifically referring to them for a purpose, make it clear 15 that you are speaking of Métis in Canada, irrespective 16 of where they live or who their predecessors were. 17 Thank you. 18 FRANK PALMATER: Write Don't make the Unless you are In New Brunswick our 19 organization never has and never will make the distinction 20 between Métis, status, non-status, we just basically call 21 everybody off-reserve Aboriginal people. 22 Commission could make a broad recommendation to the 23 government that when it deals with Aboriginal people it StenoTran If the 495 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 deals with all Aboriginal people, as defined in the 2 Constitution, Indian, Inuit and Métis. 3 My definition of "Métis" is not the same 4 as everybody else's. 5 but you must be of Aboriginal ancestry somewhere in there 6 in order to qualify for Métis. 7 Brunswick, you must prove that. 8 9 Mine would be someone of mixed blood, In the province of New Someone asked what that would mean, how many Métis in the province of New Brunswick. Well, I don't 10 think we will engage in a process. My board of directors 11 and the people may say, "You are wrong, big guy, we are 12 going to engage in it", but I somehow seriously doubt it. 13 We will not engage in an enumeration process where we 14 say, "You have to identify as one or the other, Métis, 15 non-status, Indian, Inuit, whatever." 16 If we enter into a process, it will be 17 to identify as Aboriginal people, one of the accepted terms 18 in the Constitution that would be acceptable, "Aboriginal 19 people". 20 definition of "Métis" in the province of New Brunswick. We are not going to get stuck or hung up on the 21 22 23 I hope in your recommendations you basically agree with that concept and go from there. StenoTran Some 496 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 people will want to define "Métis". 2 definition will be left up to the individual. 3 individual's choice. 4 am not asking the Commission to do that. 5 6 I do not. That That's an It's not up to the Commission. I Will there be an enumeration process? There has to be; no choice. How will governments fund 7 those who identify as Aboriginal people, but don't fall 8 under the meaning of the Indian Act? 9 taxation, royalty payments. On a per capita basis; That's all in papers that 10 the Royal Commission has now from the New Brunswick 11 Aboriginal Peoples Council. 12 for the last year and a half. 13 different documents that we have set forth. 14 We have been presenting them There are three or four Those suggestions are not new, they are 15 there. But how you deal with the definition of "Métis", 16 leave that to the people would be my recommendation. 17 Include them in the term "Aboriginal people" and when you 18 refer to government responsibility, make it responsibility 19 for Aboriginal people. 20 Thank you. 21 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 22 BERNIE HEARD: 23 short. Bernie? I will also be quite Responding to your specific question, how can you StenoTran 497 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 help us with getting this recognition, in the case of 2 Labrador -- and I make the distinction between Labrador 3 and Newfoundland --- 4 5 COMMISSIONER PETER MEEKISON: I know that. 6 BERNIE HEARD: I know you do, but I want 7 to make it clear that we do not and we never claimed to 8 represent anybody on the island of Newfoundland, only on 9 the mainland portion. 10 Mr. Wells has made it quite clear that 11 he recognizes the traditional Métis only. By 12 "traditional" I mean those we learned about in school out 13 west. 14 summer to the question of the Labrador Métis, Mr. Wells 15 went on to say that, "There are Micmacs on the island. 16 All of them have mixed blood, really. 17 pure Micmac. 18 are you people calling yourselves Métis?" In a specific response on a radio program last They are no longer If they don't call themselves Métis, why 19 My response to that is they didn't have 20 to. They could call themselves Micmacs. We can't, we 21 are not Micmacs. 22 Kirby's family perhaps would be the Micmac nation of 23 Labrador, I don't know, but again it would exclude a lot Kirby has some Micmac background. StenoTran 498 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 of the others. 2 So, his response was, "Well, why don't 3 the people on the island call themselves Métis? 4 generally the same background. 5 group of people." 6 they didn't have to. 7 we wanted to have a choice, we didn't have one. They are They have a mixed blood My response to that, basically, is that We didn't have a choice. Even if 8 If we wanted to call ourselves Inuit, 9 we could not, if we wanted to all ourselves Innu, we could 10 not because there were already organizations out there 11 using those terms. 12 we could not because there is already an organization in 13 the province calling themselves that. If we wanted to call ourselves Micmacs, 14 There is a new group on the island of 15 Newfoundland right now who are seeking -- I don't know 16 if they have ever approached you or not, but they are 17 seeking recognition through whatever means they can. 18 don't know what they are calling themselves, but they do 19 definitely have Aboriginal ancestry. 20 associate with the Micmacs and they are pretty much in 21 the same boat, I guess, except they haven't quite 22 progressed as far as we have. 23 I They cannot I don't know, I think Frank or somebody StenoTran 499 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 on this side of the table made the proper suggestion, one 2 I was going to make. 3 Wells -- and I am convinced it is only Mr. Wells. 4 Mr. Wells accepts this, I think the Newfoundland government 5 will. 6 convinced that we are Aboriginal. 7 are Métis or Micmac or whatever, we are Aboriginal and 8 let it go from there. That's my feeling. 9 10 Instead of trying to convince Mr. Once I think Mr. Wells has to be Never mind whether we It will happen. MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you very much. 11 Mr. Dussault? 12 COMMISSIONER RENÉ DUSSAULT: I would 13 like to ask a question that we have asked often during 14 the public hearings and it's the following: 15 to think that we could have a definition for one purpose 16 different than for another purpose? Is it possible 17 Of course, we are talking of Métis here, 18 but, for example, we heard again and again that the Indian 19 Act does define Indian people and it should not be done 20 by government, but only Indian people should define who 21 they are, and on and on, and we have the same kind of 22 discussion here when we talk about enumeration of Métis. 23 The difficulty stems from the fact that StenoTran 500 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 when the definition is for programs and benefits, it can't 2 be left open-ended. 3 of being a people and having the recognition as a people, 4 it's quite different, obviously. When it is for the sake of governance 5 We have tried over and over to have that 6 discussion with the various groups that were coming before 7 us and not with great success, I must say. 8 me that it is a stumbling block, in a way, because, for 9 example, we have been discussing the Métis and the Métis It seems to 10 in Quebec in particular. We were told there might be a 11 million, but it's more likely to be 2,000 or 5,000. 12 just don't know. We 13 We have been told the Commission should 14 recommend equity of access to all programs, post-secondary 15 benefits, health benefits. 16 but we want to be taken seriously and really to make 17 inroads. 18 sub-questions. 19 is enumeration control only by people who self-declare, 20 then we enter into a larger debate as to whether the whole 21 province will want to self-declare to get this additional 22 benefit available on top of the general program. 23 It's one thing to do that, We know that we have to address a couple of It then needs enumeration. Then if it As we are ending these two days, the StenoTran 501 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Commission is stuck with those kinds of questions and they 2 are very real. 3 how they would address the question as to whether we can 4 have a definition for the purpose of governance and 5 self-government and on and on and for the purpose of 6 programs and benefits and how a thing like that could be 7 managed politically and technically. 8 done? So, I would like to ask the participants How could it be 9 We can't put that issue under the carpet, 10 otherwise we are kind of discussing in a surrealist way. 11 We are not going to accomplish much as a Royal Commission 12 if we don't address those questions. 13 to the participants. 14 15 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: 18 Thank you very much. 16 17 So, I am putting If we could make our answers short and sweet again. Kirby? KIRBY LETHBRIDGE: I believe that 19 jurisdiction is what will determine whether or not this 20 an extensive welfare program or the ascendancy of people 21 to their rightful place in this nation. 22 clear during the Charlottetown process that we were not 23 interested in welfarism. StenoTran We make it very 502 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 I have talked to different people within 2 a particular Aboriginal representative organization in 3 Labrador and I was encouraged to seek membership in this 4 organization and was told that if I was who I said I was, 5 I should not have too much problem getting membership, 6 which would have gotten another mouthpiece out of the way 7 of the people who were engaging in the incredible shrinking 8 plan. 9 I never did apply for membership in that 10 organization because I am not interested in welfare. 11 Frank recognized, the goose has a very sore ass right now. 12 Like It's not able to lay very many of these eggs. 13 We are not asking for welfare, we are 14 asking in a very polite way for this Commission to make 15 its final recommendation that there is an outstanding 16 obligation to Aboriginal people right across this country 17 and that the term "Métis" in section 35(2) has nothing 18 to do with a geographic reference on a map, it has nothing 19 to do with Euro-ethnicity, that original jurisdiction 20 still applies, that the obligation of the federal 21 government, the fiduciary obligation, is to us as well 22 and that the interference that we have experienced from 23 the provinces must cease and that they have to start dealing StenoTran 503 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 with us one-on-one, federal to our level of government 2 or whatever you want to call it. It's an evolving process. 3 By sharing jurisdiction over certain 4 resources, you will see increased community benefit by 5 way of an increase of jobs, of self-esteem, revenues 6 reverting back to our communities rather than to 7 multinational corporate interests in Europe and the United 8 States. 9 I bring you back to a comment I made 10 yesterday regarding an allocation that was made by the 11 North Atlantic Fisheries organization in the 1980s when 12 they allocated 300,000 tons of ground fish to a 13 multinational corporate interest. 14 from Labrador took part in that fishery. 15 fishery, it was rape. 16 to a fish plant in Labrador. 17 some of it back processed in the United States and Atlantic 18 Canada. Not one fishing vessel It wasn't Not one of those fish came ashore We probably ended up buying 19 So, I think that rather than us trying 20 to snuggle up to the federal system and to somehow accept 21 them justifying their need for our resources, they have 22 to start recognizing that there is unfinished business 23 and we are it. We don't want to be governed in Labrador StenoTran 504 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 by St. John's, by a colonial regime in St. John's. 2 don't want to be governed by them. 3 We We see our resources being plundered and 4 looted by non-Native interests from St. John's, from 5 Newfoundland, from other parts of Canada and the United 6 States and Europe, and it's increasing. 7 jurisdiction with the federal government. 8 begging for something that isn't rightfully ours. 9 watch us. Shared We are not Just Help us to empower ourselves and help us to 10 help ourselves to what's rightfully ours and we won't 11 disappoint anybody. 12 that's not ours. We are not trying to take something 13 Thank you. 14 FRANK PALMATER: I can't really speak 15 for anyone else at the table but myself and how I would 16 like to see it. 17 going to let a bogeyman out of the closet here by saying, 18 "Holy jumpin', anybody with Aboriginal ancestry is going 19 to be able to jump on this bandwagon. 20 I don't share your concern that we are In New Brunswick you get approval. 21 Status? It don't mean dick to me. 22 paper from the government that says who can get services 23 from the Department of Indian Affairs, that's all. StenoTran It's just a piece of It 505 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 doesn't tell me who an Indian is. It has no recognition 2 of culture, tradition, ancestry, nothing. 3 piece of paper that says you can get benefits from the 4 Department of Indian Affairs, that's it. It's just a 5 In our province, if a status Indian walks 6 into our office and says, "I want to be a member because 7 I live off reserve", fine; "Where is your proof that you 8 are of Aboriginal ancestry", and then it goes before a 9 committee. So, there is the bogeyman concept, that there 10 is so many people and everybody in the province of New 11 Brunswick can apply and say, "Now there is equity of access 12 to all programs and services for all Aboriginal people 13 who identify as Aboriginal people." 14 Self-identification is something that 15 a lot of Aboriginal people were afraid to do years ago. 16 I remember my grandmother slapping me because I wanted 17 to learn the Indian language, the Micmac language. 18 talk like that", she said, "You are not allowed. 19 nuns are going to beat you up." 20 learned were the bad words, I guess, and you can do that 21 with French, too. 22 learned. 23 "Don't Them The only words that I It was only the bad words that you Proof of Aboriginal ancestry will be StenoTran 506 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 paramount. 2 New Brunswick in our organization; no choice. 3 don't like it. 4 You must prove your claim in the province of Some people Some people say, "I'm not going, Frank. I will never be a member of your organization because 5 I have to prove my ancestry." 6 will never be a member. 7 it, fine." 8 "Okay, all right, then you See you. When you want to prove So, I don't share your concern that there 9 is going to be a large number of people coming forward 10 and identifying as being a Métis and, "I want my share." 11 12 I don't share that concern. You must prove it in the province of New Brunswick. 13 Our self-government model will demand 14 that the people who go through the new Brunswick Aboriginal 15 Peoples Council, or whatever comes from the New Brunswick 16 Aboriginal Peoples Council when self-government comes in, 17 we will demand that you prove your Aboriginal ancestry; 18 no choice. 19 car how far back, but you must prove it to the satisfaction 20 of a committee; not to one person, but to a group of people. 21 If your question was how do we justify 22 to governments the amount of money that it's going to take 23 to guarantee equity of access, I don't know. We don't care where you are from and we don't StenoTran You can't 507 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 justify a 25-cent increase in their budgets today that 2 would be satisfactory to the government because they are 3 crying for money. Everybody is. 4 They cut us and our budgets all the time. 5 I don't have an answer as to how we will be able to justify 6 it. In the eyes of the government, if experience teaches 7 us anything, you will never be able to justify a claim 8 that we have; never. 9 exist, that doesn't mean that we don't have validity to 10 that claim just because they can't afford to pay for it. 11 I wish in the Commission report you could 12 take all reference to Indians, Inuit, Métis, Innu, Mohawk, 13 Cree, Crow and take that all out and call us Aboriginal 14 people because this is the Royal Commission on Aboriginal 15 People, is it not? 16 reference to Aboriginal people and just take the rest of 17 it out. 18 there. 19 we don't have to. 20 That doesn't mean the claim doesn't So, if we could do that, make all In my opinion, it's garbage. It shouldn't be We are taking it all into this conversation and Hopefully, in the Maritimes true tribal 21 government will come back, the two First Nations, the 22 Micmac and the Malacite. 23 see it. I don't know if I will live to How do we justify the monetary aspect of it? StenoTran 508 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 I really don't have an answer for you. 2 you are going to be able to justify it to the government. 3 Maybe it won't be a job that the Royal Commission will 4 I don't know how be able to complete; justification. 5 Maybe it's something that you won't be 6 able to put there and, like you said previously, if we 7 don't, they are going to take the report and put it on 8 a shelf and forget it, if it's something that they can't 9 realistically see today that they can achieve. I hope 10 that isn't what happens on this Royal Commission and that's 11 why from New Brunswick we have participated. 12 We have participated wholeheartedly and 13 we will continue because we think it's an opportunity, 14 an opportunity to voice some of the concerns that we have, 15 that as Métis/Aboriginal people we haven't been treated 16 fairly, we haven't been given equity of access to any and 17 all programs that some others have had, who take that for 18 granted. 19 I am still paying off my student loan 20 that I will probably be paying off until I am 65, if I'm 21 lucky enough to live that long. 22 I did what I had to do, some things that I wasn't supposed 23 to do and I'm paying for that. But I went to school and But how do we give StenoTran 509 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 justification? 2 to answer your question as to how we justify that to the 3 government. 4 I don't know. I don't think you will ever be able to. COMMISSIONER RENÉ DUSSAULT: 5 want to prolong that. 6 more to the general public. 7 people who want to reply. 8 9 I really don't know how I don't It's not only to government, it's But I know there are other Also I would like to say that we have been told again and again, "Don't lump all Aboriginal 10 people in a single pot because there are so many differences 11 and cultures", and on and on. 12 Okay, I am finished. 13 RICHARD LAFFERTY: You should have 14 asked this question yesterday morning. 15 have gone on until now. 16 17 18 I think we could A political definition is what I was getting at with just self-identifying Aboriginal descent. I'm from a family who has lived in the Northwest 19 Territories for -- I'm the twelfth generation. 20 the first two and the last two, there are eight generations 21 in there where there is no Indian content whatsoever. 22 It has been a Métis family up through the years. 23 Other than If my people thought and if I gave the StenoTran 510 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 wrong impression that I was saying this is the definition 2 of "Métis" that should be used everywhere, I would probably 3 be lynched. 4 the specification definition and the ones that my family 5 uses and the ones that my community uses is the same thing. That's not what I meant whatsoever because 6 7 The only Métis in my community and the 8 ones that will self-govern themselves and are well on their 9 way to doing that is my family. We will define ourselves 10 unequivocally. 11 are as Métis. 12 Territories goes, that is consistent as well. 13 There is nobody who will tell us who we As far as the Métis nation of the Northwest So, for a political definition, it's 14 either you accept the fact that there are Métis in Canada 15 and there are people of Aboriginal descent and they 16 self-identify as those Métis or you don't accept the fact 17 that there is Métis at all. I think it's that's simple 18 for a political definition. For a specific definition, 19 we know who we are. 20 Perhaps you should get all the Indians, 21 the Inuit and the other Canadians to define who they are 22 and where are all the rest. 23 probably accept that definition of who the rest of us are. If you can do that, I would StenoTran 511 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Until you can do that, I don't think that it's an 2 appropriate question to ask anybody to identify who they 3 are specifically. 4 Thank you. That's all I have. 5 RÉJAN PILOTE: Je suis chanceux, parce 6 que je n'ai jamais à parler très longtemps, parce qu'il 7 y a du monde qui parlent et qui répondent assez bien aux 8 questions; et, quand on compte tout le reste, toutes les 9 interventions, je pense que ça balance, je pense que tout 10 le monde aurait environ le même temps d'intervention. 11 Je pense que, M. Dussault -- en tout cas, 12 comme j'ai compris votre intervention -- pour vous, 13 l'autonomie gouvernementale, en tout cas, vous avez dit 14 que vous compreniez très bien notre concept et peut-être 15 même que vous aviez l'air assez positif, et j'en suis 16 content. 17 Pour ce qui a trait à l'accès aux 18 programmes, je pense que les programmes sont toujours faits 19 en fonction des besoins des gens. 20 Cri, Métis ou peu importe, c'est toujours en fonction des 21 besoins des gens. 22 ce n'est même pas une préoccupation pour moi, parce que 23 si on a besoin d'un programme de formation professionnelle Qu'on soit Montagnais, Donc moi, la question des programmes, StenoTran 512 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 dans tel métier, que tu sois de n'importe quelle nation, 2 c'est un besoin et il y a un programme qui répond à un 3 besoin. 4 questions, c'est sur qui va administrer l'argent du 5 programme; mais l'argent, il est là, le programme, il est 6 là. 7 pour répondre à la réalité métisse, mais pour moi, en tout 8 cas, ce n'est pas une préoccupation. 9 Là où on peut, par exemple, se poser des Peut-être qu'on a besoin de l'adapter un petit peu Pour toute la question de 10 l'auto-définition et tout le kit, moi, je suis d'accord 11 à ce qu'on dise qu'on fait référence aux peuples 12 autochtones mais qu'on enlève le mot "Indiens" pour le 13 remplacer par le nom des nations du Canada. 14 trompe pas, il y en a 55, plus la nation métisse; et la 15 nation métisse englobe tous les Métis du Canada. 16 Si je ne me Ensuite, quand on parle d'autonomie 17 gouvernementale, les Métis vont s'organiser un 18 gouvernement chacun dans leur région, et à ce moment-là, 19 ceux qui ne sont pas prêts à prendre la même direction, 20 c'est libre à eux. 21 Métis, ils peuvent rester membres de n'importe quelle 22 association, ils peuvent aller du côté qu'ils veulent. 23 Mais ceux qui désirent participer à l'établissement de Autant ils peuvent se définir comme StenoTran 513 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 la nation métisse et veulent se gouverner comme peuple, 2 eux doivent avoir la possibilité de le faire. 3 Je vous remercie. 4 MARTIN DUNN: Actually, for the first 5 time in two days I find myself in significant difference 6 with what just went on in response to your question. 7 Perhaps I have a different understanding 8 of what your question was driving at, but it seems to me 9 that any government department can design, through its 10 policy, a program to serve any given clientele and that 11 clientele can be defined any damn way the department feels 12 like defining it because they are the ones that are 13 providing the program and service and that has been the 14 problem in terms of responding to your question. 15 If we were to say, "Yes, of course", we 16 are, in effect, granting the government the right to define 17 "Métis" and that's what we cannot do. 18 to avoid at any cost, even if it costs us whatever programs 19 and services might be available if we were to agree. 20 That's what we have But that doesn't prevent a department, 21 in an accommodation mode as opposed to a conflict 22 management mode, from sitting down and negotiating an 23 agreement with a community, which becomes defined in terms StenoTran 514 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 of the agreement for that specific service, whether that 2 community is called the Métis of Toronto or the Métis of 3 North York or the Métis of Labrador or the Métis of the 4 Northwest Territories, as long as the community that is 5 in the process of negotiating with the department does 6 the defining. 7 The difficulty comes when government 8 imposes definition for administrative convenience. 9 That's what has to be resisted. So, it's quite possible 10 to have many, many different definitions of "Métis" for 11 specific purposes, as long as the Métis for whom that 12 purpose is designed participates in designing that 13 definition. 14 I don't know whether that gives you a 15 slightly different slant on your question or not. I think 16 it's quite possible to -- just as a general example, 17 governments seem to think that every Aboriginal person 18 in this country is poor and needs the money and needs it 19 tomorrow, and that's not true. 20 Aboriginal people in this country. 21 middle class Aboriginal people in this country who will 22 never require a government service and who pay taxes so 23 that others can have such government service. There are a lot of rich StenoTran There are a lot of 515 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 So, I think you can design a specific 2 program to serve a specific community and to evolve 3 definitions in relationship with that community that serve 4 the delivery of that policy or program. 5 to designing national or broad regional programs that 6 incorporate numbers of populations, then it becomes 7 impossible. 8 But when it comes That's why the Métis Accord definition 9 generated such paranoia in the rest of Canada, because 10 although the Accord itself specifically said it was to 11 apply only to the region identified as the Métis homeland 12 and only to the constituents of a specific number, a defined 13 number of Aboriginal organizations, there was an intense 14 fear that every government who signed that Accord would, 15 by virtue of signing it, exclude all other Métis from any 16 service that might ever be provided to Métis. 17 So, you are right, there can be different 18 approaches made in the context of different purposes, but 19 the trigger to all of those processes must be held in the 20 hands of the Aboriginal community, not in the hands of 21 the government who would then impose it on that community. 22 23 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: response, Monique. StenoTran One last 516 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 MONIQUE McKAY: 2 off my government hat. 3 this. 4 I'm just going to take I usually do it a lot sooner than I think it's important for the 5 Commission -- I mean I don't think the Commission, like 6 government, is ever going to come up with a definition 7 and say, "We have found who the Métis are and this is who 8 they are", and give a precise definition. 9 it is important for the Commission to recognize that there 10 is a sense of nationalism amongst Métis peoples and those 11 Métis peoples, as we have heard today, stem from different 12 parts of the country. 13 But I think There is a sense of nationalism in the 14 west, we have all heard. 15 sense, I would think everyone has picked up now, from Quebec 16 and other parts of Canada. 17 it's important for the Commission to understand and relay 18 in its recommendations. 19 There also is a pretty strong I think it's that concept that It's always dangerous to agree with a 20 guy that's bigger than you, too, but it's not just that 21 we are Aboriginal people. 22 communities that are different from other Aboriginal 23 groups. There is a Métis community or They are different and they express that in their StenoTran 517 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 sense of nationalism. 2 MODERATOR KAREN COLLINS: Thank you 3 very much for your participation and your cooperation this 4 afternoon. 5 now remove myself from this job. You have made my job very pleasant. 6 Thank you. 7 CHAIRMAN JIM BOURQUE: 8 much, indeed, K.C. I will Thank you very You did a real good job. 9 We come to the tail end of our program 10 and I am going to ask our rapporteur, Marty Dunn, to give 11 us a little bit of a blurb on what he feels happened over 12 the last couple of days. 13 14 I am sure that you can do it in about five minutes, Marty. 15 MARTIN DUNN: Or less. I have 50 pages 16 of notes, so I have no intention of going over those notes. 17 In retrospect, of course, when you look 18 back on what you might have or what might have been done 19 to make this meeting a little more successful, I take some 20 responsibility for the fact that the discussion has been 21 perhaps less helpful in terms of directly answering some 22 of the questions that were proposed than it might have 23 been. StenoTran 518 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 When we initially began to plan this, 2 we had hoped that there would be two days for this group 3 to meet with each other before they met with you, 4 specifically for the purposes of focusing our attention, 5 and that proved to be not feasible economically. 6 am sorry I didn't press a little bit harder for that because 7 I think it would have made this meeting a little smoother 8 and perhaps even a little more productive. 9 to say that it hasn't been. 10 Now I That's not I didn't go to the supper last night, 11 you might have noticed, because I wanted to go over these 12 notes. 13 would have a clear head and then sat down and went at them. 14 I was surprised by the amount of coherency that actually 15 comes out of it when you begin picking the salient points 16 from each person's presentation. I went home and slept for four hours so that I 17 You may not be aware that I have been 18 asked to draft an actual summary of this meeting in print. 19 Would that be distributed to participants? 20 Well, then, you will have that, in any case. 21 Yes, good. I think the two most significant things 22 to come out of this meeting were, to some extent, 23 predictable in the sense that one of the purposes of this StenoTran 519 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 meeting was to present to the Commission the diversity 2 of Métis existence in Canada and I think we have exceeded 3 that beyond our wildest expectations in the sense that 4 almost every voice here had a unique flavour in terms of 5 its approach to things, in terms of how they related to 6 identity, how they related to Aboriginal and Treaty rights, 7 how they perceived the problems of the impediments to 8 access to Aboriginal and Treaty rights and the differences 9 in solutions proposed to address those impediments. 10 To be fair to the Commission, this is 11 the first full-length hearing I have been a party to, 12 although, actually, I guess the one in Saskatoon was the 13 first one, but that was broken up into different sessions 14 so it wasn't quite so intense. 15 very much for the work you have done, not just in the last 16 two days but for the incredible patients you display in 17 terms of sitting there and absorbing this barrage of 18 information that comes at you. 19 I want to thank you all I guess, in terms of focusing the thing 20 in sort of a wrap-up sense, if your report and if your 21 recommendations are able to just reflect the diversity 22 and to establish that that diversity is valid and that 23 there must be mechanisms and processes -- not to forge StenoTran 520 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 anything into a big globule package that can't be handled, 2 but that there must be recommendations that permit the 3 development of mechanisms to accommodate the diversity 4 -- I think that's the key element to this whole thing, 5 not just in terms of Métis, but in terms of Aboriginal 6 people in general. 7 I think if there is one lesson that came 8 out of the First Ministers' Conference process, it was 9 that. It was that the old habit of developing a model 10 which everyone would then mould themselves to simply does 11 not work any more. 12 it just took a long time to fall apart. 13 thoroughly fallen apart. 14 about that. 15 does not work, no matter how much people struggle to get 16 into it via 91(24) or any other doorway. It cannot work. It never did work, But now it has I don't think there is any doubt The model of the Department of Indian Affairs 17 I understand that there is a policy 18 development process going to go on now and that groups 19 of people are going to address different aspects of 20 different issues and that there is a year-long process 21 now going to be undertaken to absorb all of this data and 22 to form it into some kind of final report and 23 recommendations. StenoTran 521 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 If that report and if those 2 recommendations reflect the diversity of Métis peoples 3 themselves -- that is, that there are diverse and distinct 4 Métis peoples with sometimes related, sometimes 5 independent heritages, and that they are all validly 6 identified as being Aboriginal and as being Métis within 7 the meaning of section 35 and that their just aspirations 8 should be accommodated -- that's about all you can do. 9 I think it's up to you to propose the 10 solutions. 11 for a frame of reference, a forum, a change in attitude 12 on the part of governments which will allow each of these 13 communities in their own right to step forward and 14 negotiate the specific responses that they need from 15 government. 16 should be. 17 possibilities. 18 I think it's up to you to propose the necessity You cannot propose what those responses There are too many problems and too many All you can hope to do, I think, is 19 encourage -- well, perhaps I shouldn't say "encourage". 20 I would hope you would actually demand because although 21 I realize you have to present what is workable, I don't 22 think you should present the lowest common denominator. 23 You have to take some high ground in terms of saying, StenoTran 522 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 3 "Whatever the cost, it's going to cost more if we don't." That's the response to the question of cost. It's going to cost you more if you don't, a lot more. 4 I hope that the people around this table 5 have been able to demonstrate to you -- and I certainly 6 got from the discussions here -- that whatever the details 7 are and whatever the specific issues and proposals might 8 be, what is being dealt with here is a very real human 9 reality. It's not a question just of policy and it's not 10 a question just of constitutional law and it's not a 11 question of political relationship entirely, it's a 12 question of human identity, it's a question of how 13 Canadians experience themselves, how the original 14 Canadians experienced themselves. 15 I hope we have given you ammunition to 16 adopt that kind of a frame of reference and to use that 17 as a springboard in terms of your policy development and 18 in terms of your recommendations. 19 the resolutions of the Assembly of the Native Council of 20 Canada, which are appended to this report, become an 21 official part of this meeting and of this presentation 22 and that they will be considered in due course. 23 I'm assuming, too, that I haven't had a chance to talk to the StenoTran 523 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 people at NCC yet as to whether specific intervention will 2 be made by a letter or whatever in relation to those 3 resolutions, but they are here, in any case, and I hope 4 you will consider them in the course of your deliberations. 5 I thank, too, all of the people who came 6 here and who expressed themselves as individuals and as 7 representatives of their community. 8 at any rate, that if you now know nothing else that you 9 didn't know two days ago, it is that there are a lot of 10 good Métis people out there who are looking for solutions 11 and who are looking to you to open the door to the process 12 where those solutions can be achieved. 13 14 I hope, or I assume, CHAIRMAN JIM BOURQUE: Thank you, Mr. Dunn. 15 I just have one comment. I am glad to 16 hear, Frank, that you have an open-door policy in your 17 organization because I can trace my roots to New Brunswick. 18 In fact we might even be related, who knows. 19 FRANK PALMATER: Watch it now, be 20 careful. I have always been very careful about that, Jim, 21 because there is an old saying in New Brunswick: 22 pick your friends and you can pick your nose, but you can't 23 pick your family. StenoTran You can 524 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 2 CHAIRMAN JIM BOURQUE: to ask Mr. Dussault for his closing remarks. 3 4 Now I am going CO-CHAIR RENÉ DUSSAULT: long day for everybody. It has been a I won't take much of your time. 5 First of all, I would like to say that 6 Bertha Wilson has not been with us today because she had 7 a prior commitment. 8 speech and she wanted to convey her regret for not being 9 able to be with us for the full two days. 10 She went to Toronto to deliver a Georges Erasmus had to leave after 11 coffee break for personal reasons also and he asked me 12 to convey that he really appreciated meeting each and every 13 one of you, as all Commissioners did, during the last two 14 days. 15 We had an opportunity to meet many of 16 you and certainly probably most of you during the hearings, 17 but we were sitting in panels and, frankly, we felt that, 18 as a Commission, as a whole, it was very important for 19 us to be exposed to this kind of diversity of people and 20 experience that you have given us during the last two days. 21 We are looking forward very much to that kind of exposure 22 and having everybody around the table. 23 from the Northwest Territories, we have learned from StenoTran We have learned 525 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Quebec, we have learned from Ontario, Labrador, New 2 Brunswick and all those who participated, and the B.C. 3 people also. 4 Obviously, this meeting was to focus on 5 the Métis situation outside the Prairies, but we do have 6 representatives from the Prairie provinces, from 7 government and we were very happy to have these 8 representatives. 9 picture of the whole situation and the whole reality and So, I think we come out with a clearer 10 it is going to be very important for the Commission's 11 deliberations. 12 We would have liked, of course, to dig 13 maybe a bit further on the solutions and the difficulties. 14 We heard some wisdom from our rapporteur in a way and 15 we will be looking forward to read the report and certainly 16 suggestions that will be made. 17 to each and every one of you. 18 This will be circulated Je voudrais en terminant remercier tous 19 les participants d'avoir accepté notre invitation. 20 Durant ces deux journées, je pense que nous avons accompli 21 certainement un travail de sensibilisation collective qui 22 était absolument nécessaire et important. 23 Il y a eu peut-être certaines StenoTran 526 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 difficultés qui se sont soulevées; on n'a pas eu tous les 2 participants qu'on aurait aimé avoir du côté des 3 gouvernements certainement. 4 certain nombre d'empêchements du côté d'un certain nombre 5 de représentants du côté des femmes métisses qui ont amené 6 la situation qu'on a vécue. 7 des querelles de drapeau. 8 réalité, ça montre l'importance de pouvoir dialoguer en 9 étant sensibles à toutes les réalités et, effectivement, 10 Également, il y a eu un Également, on a failli avoir C'est effectivement une c'est une réalité qui est complexe. 11 La Commission espère, avec les 12 commentaires qui ont été faits, pouvoir éviter en tout 13 cas les erreurs importantes sur ce plan-là dans le choix 14 de ses mots, dans la façon de s'exprimer. 15 apparaissait encore une fois essentiel de pouvoir faire 16 cette rencontre. 17 aptes à non seulement produire des recommandations qui, 18 nous l'espérons, vont être acceptables à la fois pour tous 19 les Métis du Canada mais également pour les gouvernements 20 et le grand public, parce qu'on doit avoir un oeil aussi 21 sur la réception dans le grand public, mais également, 22 nous espérons pouvoir nous exprimer d'une façon qui va 23 être convaincante à la fois pour les peuples autochtones Il nous Ça va certainement nous rendre plus StenoTran 527 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 au Canada et également pour le gouvernement et le public. 2 Alors nous espérons que nous allons 3 pouvoir garder le contact d'ici la fin de nos travaux, 4 et n'hésitez pas à nous faire parvenir des idées 5 additionnelles. 6 material, share your additional thoughts with us until 7 the end of this year becaue we will be looking forward 8 to hearing from you. 9 Do not hesitate to send us additional Merci. 10 JIM BOURQUE: Merci. 11 Mr. Chartrand? 12 COMMISSIONER PAUL CHARTRAND: 13 you, Jim. 14 the Métis Commissioner on this panel of seven. Thank I have been asked to make comments since I am 15 Having said that, I want to emphasize 16 that the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples does not 17 speak on behalf of anyone and any particular Commissioner 18 does not speak on behalf of anybody else. 19 people and Aboriginal organizations can do an excellent 20 job of doing that themselves. 21 policy recommendations to the federal government based 22 on our judgment and your views are important material 23 considerations in arriving at that judgment. The Aboriginal Our role is that of making StenoTran 528 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 We have heard a lot in the last two days 2 about identity. Canada is a project built upon the ancient 3 homeland of others and in that process many identities 4 have been submerged and distorted. 5 where these identities now emerge. 6 reformulate themselves and this certainly is a process 7 that takes time. 8 9 We are seeing a process They emerge and We heard in these last two days that in this process we see a beneficial outcome where many 10 individuals acknowledge the significance of their 11 Aboriginal roots. 12 nationalism and various notions of nationalism and indeed 13 other notions of identity about Métis people and the 14 signficance of personal and group identity for purposes 15 of policy-making, including the matter of defining for 16 policy purposes the Indian, the Métis and the Inuit 17 peoples, as an exceedingly difficult task. 18 19 We certainly have heard about Métis It has the kind of complexity that makes the head hurt. It is also a very sensitive discussion. 20 It involves not only matters very close to the heart and 21 sole of identity, but matters that involve symbols as well. 22 23 A number of people have remarked that StenoTran 529 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 the longest debate in the history of Parliament was the 2 flag debate. 3 interesting difficult debates and this is no exception. 4 It seems that it is unavoidable at the end of the day 5 to tie definitions for policy-making purposes to specific 6 goals; that is, I cannot see how we can avoid a functional 7 approach to definitions. 8 9 Matters of identity always generate very I would like to make a general remark to complete my remarks. First, Canada is a large country 10 with a very unique history and we have many Aboriginal 11 peoples scattered in various places across the country 12 as individuals and as communities. 13 very small in comparison to the population of Canada and 14 in comparison to the geography of this country. 15 little power, relatively speaking, and these are all 16 material considerations for our mandate. The Métis people are They have 17 You will recall that in 1885 when Louis 18 Riel was hanged, the Prime Minister of the day, MacDonald, 19 made a speech, in which he said that Riel shall hang, though 20 every dog in Quebec barks in his favour. 21 the fact that the Métis people, with this little power 22 that we have had in Canada and have in Canada, have never 23 been the primary political actors in this country. StenoTran That symbolizes 530 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 But I think it's essential to recognize, 2 at least if we are going to talk about the group rights 3 as a Métis people, the nature of the Métis people as 4 political actors. 5 two days suggests other than a notion of self-government, 6 as a race-based government, is not an obstacle to the 7 gaining of that in Canada. 8 9 Nothing that I have heard in these last How is power to be gained by this small group? I have heard a few general suggestions. I have 10 heard an emphasis on education, I have heard an emphasis 11 on the access to the benefits of income and profits. 12 is much to be said for the notion that knowledge is power 13 and that economic power precedes and necessarily 14 accompanies political power. 15 There We have heard also about direct action, 16 today we did. We have heard also about the benefits of 17 Aboriginal solidarity and I also heard about the benefits 18 of court action that can be taken. 19 about the large struggle of the Métis people, I can't help 20 but notice that the identity of the Métis is insecure in 21 many ways in this country. But when I reflect 22 But one of the largest difficulties in 23 trying to understand that is this Métis insecurity takes StenoTran 531 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 place in the context of a Canadian identity that is itself 2 insecure and in the context of a Quebecois identity also 3 that is insecure. 4 the issue even more complex than might otherwise be. 5 could not forget the difficulties that arise because of 6 competing nationalisms. 7 I think these are all matters that make We To finish, I note that many speakers 8 turned to notions of rights in order to explain to us the 9 nature of their claims. As somebody said, rights in Canada 10 has replaced warfare, unless some people are not quite 11 sure about what they have called constitutional warfare. 12 But it's our job to make policy recommendations to the 13 federal government and if we are to adopt the dialogue 14 of rights, then I would note that the dialogue of rights 15 requires very, very careful explanations. 16 That is a very large question. It's a 17 large burden that we have to undertake and we cannot avoid 18 and it's for that reason that we thank you so very much 19 for your help because without your help we do not have 20 the factual background which is necessary for making our 21 decisions, making our judgments. 22 23 Je remercie tous ceux qui nous ont parlé en français; je vous ai bien écoutés. StenoTran Je regrette 532 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 seulement que, manquant de pratique, et du fait que je 2 pense maintenant depuis beaucoup d'années en anglais, 3 c'est mieux pour tout le monde que je m'exprime 4 ordinairement en anglais. 5 6 Merci beaucoup. I thank also our rapporteur, Mr. Dunn, and all the staff who assisted us. Meegwetch. 7 CHAIRMAN JIM BOURQUE: 8 Right after Mr. Sinclair gives his 9 Thank you, Paul. closing remarks, Mr. Dussault is going to make a 10 presentation to a unique individual. I am going to ask 11 you all to stay for that, not to leave until that's done. 12 Mr. Sinclair? 13 JIM SINCLAIR, President, Native Council 14 of Canada: Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen. 15 I noticed when I came in the room this afternoon you were 16 talking about identity and the geographical existence of 17 the Métis. 18 said, you would have ended with that, because that's really 19 the crux of the problems that seems to have been happening 20 over the last few years. If you had started with that, like someone 21 First of all, I would like to say again 22 that prior to the first constitutional meeting that was 23 committed through the constitutional amendment that StenoTran 533 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 allowed for, I think it was, five meetings over four years 2 or four meetings over five years -- I can't remember, we 3 have been at so many -- that addressed Aboriginal issues 4 and some amendments to the Constitution. 5 decision was made about who would represent at the table 6 the Métis people, of course, we had some difficulties, 7 much as you are having difficulties today. 8 9 When the At that time, we took the Prime Minister to court. But I would like to give just a little background 10 to maybe understand where at that time the Métis homeland 11 or we felt it existed. 12 When we took the Prime Minister to court, 13 prior to that, we had a national meeting to talk about 14 Métis issues and Métis identity. 15 in Edmonton, Alberta. 16 there and we didn't really draw any lines as to where these 17 people would come from. 18 meeting and Métis who felt that they belonged or wanted 19 to be identified and wanted to have a place at the table 20 at the constitutional talks should be there. 21 That meeting was held We had approximately 500 people We just said we would call a We had people from the Territories, from 22 the Yukon, from Alberta, from British Columbia, from 23 Saskatchewan, from Manitoba and northwestern Ontario. StenoTran 534 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 That seemed to be the extent of our people that came at 2 that time and when we went to court, we based the Métis 3 homeland in terms of that geographical area. 4 even had a badge or one of these little pins that had the 5 geographical area of the Métis people. 6 In fact we When we went to court at that time, we 7 were given seats at the table under those conditions. 8 But at no time did we ever say that is the end or that's 9 it for the boundaries, because even in our own organization 10 at that particular time the identity was almost mushrooming 11 out. 12 Some people felt that Batouche was the 13 homeland of the Métis and that that's where it should all 14 begin, some people felt the Red River was the Métis where 15 it should all begin, and we had the most prominent Métis 16 from Batouche, Frederick McDougall and Howard Adams, who 17 at that time, when I first met to begin organizing, used 18 the word "half-breed". 19 and we seemed to be comfortable with that for many years 20 because half-breed included me, half-breed included many 21 of us who are mostly Indian who did not belong to the Indian 22 reserves. 23 They used the word "half-breed" We were comfortable with that. When we got into the Métis side, of StenoTran 535 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 course, it began to be a much more difficult identity. 2 Some people said the Red River Métis are the Métis where 3 all existence comes from and, of course, others said, "What 4 about us who are English Métis, what about us who are Scotch 5 Métis." 6 We even had organizations that joined 7 us -- and I wish we still had those documents -- from Poland, 8 we had from France, we had from England and we had from 9 Italy, people who were members of our organization through 10 a charter, who corresponded with us from overseas. 11 Because of the Second World War, there were also people 12 over there who felt they were Métis people. 13 again they were even on an international basis. 14 to you today that Howard Adams, who at that time was a 15 very prominent spokesman for Métis people and still is 16 today -- he has a very militant radical point of view of 17 Canada -- he talked about the growing sense of Métis 18 nationalism and he never confined that to any place. 19 said, "There is a growing sense of nationalism of Métis 20 people in Canada", and I think that sense of nationalism 21 is still growing today. 22 23 So, I say He So, I want to say to you again that I don't believe that again we have to close the doors on StenoTran 536 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 anyone. That's not up to me, it's not up to this 2 Commission, it's not up to governments. 3 people themselves to struggle for their identity and to 4 come forward with their identity. It's up to the 5 It's getting to the stage now during the 6 next few years of negotiations that I am going to say things 7 here that maybe our board members might come back and say 8 I am wrong. 9 can no longer get up and say it represents everybody. But I am saying that a national organization 10 People must represent themselves. 11 themselves and they must see fit how to represent 12 themselves. 13 They must represent We can only facilitate the development 14 or facilitate their negotiations or a process with 15 governments, but we can no longer come along and try to 16 pretend that we represent people, who, when it comes down 17 to reality, are not represented at all. 18 to the urban Indians in Winnipeg, I can go back to the 19 urban Indians in Regina, I can go back to the urban Indians 20 in other places who are not represented by us or the Indian 21 organizations or anyone. 22 represent themselves. 23 help facilitate them, but they must identify and represent I can go back I am telling them they must We will open the doors, we will StenoTran 537 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 themselves. 2 I think that's the road that we want to take. I remember Prime Minister Trudeau, when 3 he was at one of the first constitutional meetings. When 4 he addressed the Métis issues, he said, "We have a social 5 problem. 6 problem", because a social problem means that somebody 7 wants to look after us in terms of our welfare, in terms 8 of our little programs here and there. I said, "No, we don't, we have a political 9 But we have a political problem that 10 needs a political solution because we are a people who 11 have been despised and dispersed and you wouldn't be having 12 that argument today if we had a clear identity, if we had 13 some way of understanding, and I won't impose my views 14 on another nation. 15 I think today even the Métis themselves 16 are using the words "Métis nation" in different provinces 17 as not just one Métis nation, but a Métis nation here and 18 a Métis nation there, and that's fair enough because there 19 are many nations of Métis people who think differently 20 and who understand things differently and see themselves 21 differently. 22 23 That's fair to me. Mr. Lafferty here has talked about the Northwest Territories. I have been there many times and StenoTran 538 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 I see the identity that these people have and the pride 2 they have in their identity is very, very important, very, 3 very important. 4 Manitoba where people there have a view of their identity 5 and it's very, very important to them. 6 different, but they are still the same people when they 7 get together at a meeting. 8 arguments, the same discussions. 9 Yet, at the same time, I have been to It may be We still have the same So, again I just want to express to you 10 the feelings that this Commission, hearing some of the 11 views, may not have any of the answers. 12 have the answers today, but we will through you people 13 organizing yourselves and fighting your rights and we must 14 facilitate those rights as political organizations and 15 we must help people in pursing those rights. 16 important for us. 17 on anyone. 18 Maybe we didn't That's But we cannot enforce or impose anything I'm glad to see that some of the 19 organizations -- I remember during the early days at the 20 Native Council of Canada when we talked about Métis. 21 People in eastern Canada at that time didn't use the word 22 "Métis" because they were talking about going back to their 23 original roots, the Micmac and Malacite. StenoTran 539 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 So, they talked about that and that was 2 their goal and I am glad today so many of them have achieved 3 those goals and are still looking at bringing in the rest 4 of their people that's left out. 5 done by an Indian Act, it's going to be done by Aboriginal 6 governments, if I can use that word. 7 It's not going to be So, we have some hard work ahead of us 8 and I think that we need to help wherever we can help, 9 and we are prepared to do that. 10 those issues. 11 implemented in this country. 12 This country has to address There are certain rights that have to be Yesterday Paul and I were having a talk 13 and I heard someone say today -- and I think it's true 14 to some degree; it's not something that you can just laugh 15 at -- the fact is that we say within the Métis homeland, 16 "Why ask us to identify? 17 because if you are in another nation, it's not for the 18 nation to identify itself, it's for the others to identify 19 within that particular nation. 20 Why not the others identify", So, this is a two-bladed sword. You 21 can't be talking about one thing without somebody else 22 coming along and talking about another. 23 there is a responsibility there to sit down with StenoTran So, I think that 540 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 governments as well once you decide on your membership 2 or citizenship and have some clear discussions on some 3 of these issues. 4 I didn't like to take up too much time, 5 Jim, but I know that you talked about some of these issues 6 today. 7 future, we are going to have to address them as political 8 organizations, we are going to have to deal with the 9 governments on this. 10 They are going to have to be addressed in the We have our job cut out for us and we are going to have to do our best at it. Thanks a lot. 11 I would like to thank the Commission for 12 being here the last couple of days to listen to some of 13 our people and I think, of all the jobs you have had over 14 the last few months, this one of the toughest because 15 everybody has now been brought in. 16 at the fringe areas -- and I hate to use that word, but 17 it's the truth to some matter -- that people are just 18 starting to get up now and say, "Hey, we are Métis and 19 there is a growing sense of nationalism and it's finally 20 going right across Canada." 21 whether we like it or not. We are just looking We have to deal with that That's what we have to do. 22 Thanks a lot. 23 CHAIRMAN JIM BOURQUE: StenoTran Thank you, Mr. 541 Wednesday, April 6, 1994 Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples 1 Sinclair. 2 At this time I would also like to thank 3 all the participants for their cooperation and discussion. 4 I think there was some frank dialogue and it's always 5 6 good to see. I want to thank you all. Now I am going to call on Elder Vincent 7 to come and take this chair to do his prayer from here 8 because there is another function as well. 9 COPRÉSIDENT RENÉ DUSSAULT: Alors avant 10 que M. Vincent ne fasse la prière, en témoignage de 11 remerciement et de reconnaissance pour le travail qu'il 12 a fait avec nous, qui est certainement très utile, je 13 voudrais vous remercier d'avoir accepté notre invitation 14 et vous donner un témoignage de notre appréciation. 15 PAUL VINCENT, ancien: Merci beaucoup. 16 On m'a prié de porter à votre 17 connaissance que ce soir nous ne faisons que clôturer cette 18 assemblée spéciale. 19 travaux à ce moment-ci; ils vont continuer encore, et 20 d'autres réunions sont prévues dans l'avenir. 21 --- (Prière de clôture par Paul Vincent, ancien) 22 --- Whereupon the Hearing concluded at 5:50 p.m. La Commission ne terminera pas ses StenoTran